share_log

Graphjet Technology's (NASDAQ:GTI) Chief Scientific Officer Yun Liu Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 12% Last Week

Graphjet Technology's (NASDAQ:GTI) Chief Scientific Officer Yun Liu Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 12% Last Week

Graphjet Technology(納斯達克:GTI)的首席科學官劉韻是最樂觀的內部人士,他們的持股上週增長了12%
Simply Wall St ·  12/04 19:47

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Graphjet Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 57% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • Graphjet科技的顯著內部持股表明對公司擴展的固有利益
  • 前三大股東持有該企業57%的股份。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

A look at the shareholders of Graphjet Technology (NASDAQ:GTI) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 54% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看Graphjet科技(納斯達克:GTI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。 個人內部人士持有54%的股份,是公司中最大的股東。 換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$370m market cap following a 12% gain in the stock.

因此,內部人士上週的得分最高,因爲公司市值達到了37000萬美元,股票上漲了12%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Graphjet Technology.

在下圖中,我們聚焦於Graphjet科技的不同持有群體。

big
NasdaqGM:GTI Ownership Breakdown December 4th 2024
納斯達克GM:GTI 持股分佈 2024年12月4日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Graphjet Technology?

機構持股缺乏對Graphjet科技意味着什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

通常,不活躍的小公司缺少機構投資者,但大公司缺少機構投資者則不太常見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Graphjet Technology's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

沒有機構持有某家公司股票可能有多種原因。通常,小型新上市公司不會吸引基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在該公司建立重要的持倉。或者,該公司可能存在某種導致機構投資者遠離的因素。Graphjet科技的盈利和營業收入記錄(見下文)可能對機構投資者沒有吸引力——或者他們可能根本沒有認真考慮這個業務。

big
NasdaqGM:GTI Earnings and Revenue Growth December 4th 2024
納斯達克GM:GTI 2024年12月4日的盈利及營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Graphjet Technology. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Graphjet Technology's case, its Chief Scientific Officer, Yun Liu, is the largest shareholder, holding 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 19% and 14%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Hooi Lim is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Ping Wei Lee directly holds 6.0% of the total shares outstanding.

我們注意到對Graphjet科技,對沖基金的投資並不顯著。因爲行動勝於言辭,當內部人士在一家公司擁有大量股份時,我們認爲這是一個好兆頭。在Graphjet科技的案例中,其首席科學官劉雲是最大的股東,持有25%的流通股。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有19%和14%的流通股。有趣的是,第三大股東Hooi Lim也是董事會主席,再次表明公司主要股東之間強烈的內部持股。此外,公司CEO李平偉直接持有6.0%的全部流通股。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.

股東登記簿的更詳細研究表明,三個最大股東擁有該公司57%的股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但考慮到分析師的看法,了解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此它可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Graphjet Technology

Graphjet科技的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Graphjet Technology. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$199m stake in this US$370m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息顯示,內部人持有Graphjet Technology超過一半的股份。這使他們有效控制公司。因此,他們在這個37000萬的業務中擁有19900萬的股份。看到這種投資水平是值得欣慰的。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人是否最近有買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Graphjet Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Graphjet Technology 28%的股份。雖然這個持股比例可能不足以在政策決定上影響他們的利益,但他們仍然可以共同對公司政策產生影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 19%, of the Graphjet Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

似乎私人公司擁有Graphjet Technology股票的19%。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下這些私人公司的所有者。有時內部人士或其他相關方通過其他私人公司對一家上市公司的股票有利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Graphjet Technology has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我發現研究一家公司的具體所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例——我們認爲Graphjet Technology有4個警告信號,你應該注意。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論