牛牛AI助理已提取核心訊息
Bowyer Research has recommended that Apple shareholders vote in favor of Proposal No. 5, which calls for an investigation and subsequent report on Apple's app content curation standards and dispute management procedures. The proposal aims to address concerns over Apple's prioritization of interests in content removal requests, which some view as ideological rather than practical. Apple's Board of Directors opposes the proposal, claiming that the company already provides sufficient information on app curation and government takedown orders, and maintains active oversight of content moderation policies. However, Bowyer Research criticizes the Board's response as mischaracterizing the proposal and offering vague commitments in light of serious deplatforming policy concerns. The report cites instances of Apple's content removal, such as the deplatforming of Parler and Gab, and legal action against employees raising content moderation concerns, as evidence of the need for greater transparency. The Board's stance is seen as potentially damaging to Apple's trust with shareholders and its reputation, given the political implications of content moderation decisions.
Bowyer Research has recommended that Apple shareholders vote in favor of Proposal No. 5, which calls for an investigation and subsequent report on Apple's app content curation standards and dispute management procedures. The proposal aims to address concerns over Apple's prioritization of interests in content removal requests, which some view as ideological rather than practical. Apple's Board of Directors opposes the proposal, claiming that the company already provides sufficient information on app curation and government takedown orders, and maintains active oversight of content moderation policies. However, Bowyer Research criticizes the Board's response as mischaracterizing the proposal and offering vague commitments in light of serious deplatforming policy concerns. The report cites instances of Apple's content removal, such as the deplatforming of Parler and Gab, and legal action against employees raising content moderation concerns, as evidence of the need for greater transparency. The Board's stance is seen as potentially damaging to Apple's trust with shareholders and its reputation, given the political implications of content moderation decisions.
Bowyer Research建議蘋果股東對第5號提案投贊成票，該提案要求對蘋果的應用程序內容管理標準和爭議管理程序進行調查並隨後提出報告。該提案旨在解決人們對蘋果在內容刪除請求中優先考慮利益的擔憂，有人認爲這是意識形態而不是實際的。蘋果董事會反對該提議，聲稱該公司已經提供了有關應用策劃和政府下架令的足夠信息，並對內容審核政策保持積極監督。但是，Bowyer Research批評董事會的回應錯誤地描述了該提案，並鑑於嚴重的平台化政策擔憂，提供了模糊的承諾。該報告列舉了蘋果刪除內容的例子，例如Parler and Gab的去平台化，以及對提出內容審核問題的員工提起法律訴訟，以此作爲提高透明度的必要性的證據。鑑於內容審核決策的政治影響，董事會的立場被視爲可能會損害蘋果對股東的信任及其聲譽。
Bowyer Research建議蘋果股東對第5號提案投贊成票，該提案要求對蘋果的應用程序內容管理標準和爭議管理程序進行調查並隨後提出報告。該提案旨在解決人們對蘋果在內容刪除請求中優先考慮利益的擔憂，有人認爲這是意識形態而不是實際的。蘋果董事會反對該提議，聲稱該公司已經提供了有關應用策劃和政府下架令的足夠信息，並對內容審核政策保持積極監督。但是，Bowyer Research批評董事會的回應錯誤地描述了該提案，並鑑於嚴重的平台化政策擔憂，提供了模糊的承諾。該報告列舉了蘋果刪除內容的例子，例如Parler and Gab的去平台化，以及對提出內容審核問題的員工提起法律訴訟，以此作爲提高透明度的必要性的證據。鑑於內容審核決策的政治影響，董事會的立場被視爲可能會損害蘋果對股東的信任及其聲譽。
有用
沒用