永明人壽金融公司(Sun Life Financial Inc.)是一家以加拿大爲註冊地的上市公司,是加拿大永明人壽保險公司(「永明人壽」)的控股公司。在本管理層的討論和分析(「MD&A」)中,SLF公司、其子公司以及在適用的情況下,其合資企業和聯營公司統稱爲「本公司」、「永明人壽」、「我們」、「我們」和「我們」。除非另有說明,否則本MD&A中的所有信息均以截至2024年12月31日的年度爲單位提供,本文檔中包含的信息以加元表示。本文檔中的金額受四捨五入影響。2023年收益和合同服務利潤率(CSM)變動分析中的某些結果已得到改進,以更準確地反映業務的管理方式。
2024年3月21日,爲了履行監管義務,我們完成了出售我們在Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited(BSE:ABSLAMC.BO和NSE:ABSLAMC.NS)的6.3%股權的交易,產生了9,800美元萬(稅後8,400美元萬)的報告淨收益。作爲交易的結果,我們在ABSLAMC的所有權權益從36.5%降至30.2%,總收益爲
•榮獲保險投資者年度最佳保險投資策略獎,以表彰我們的首席投資官Randy Brown和永明人壽投資管理團隊令人難以置信的努力、創新和人才實力。(1)成立了SLC Global Insurance Group,這是一個專注於爲世界領先的保險公司提供定製投資解決方案的複雜需求的團隊。我們深厚的保險傳統與我們多樣化的投資能力相結合,爲客戶創造了高度差異化和量身定製的體驗。(1)推出Scotia私人房地產基金,通過我們與Scotiabank的戰略合作伙伴關係進行分銷。利用BGO深厚的房地產投資能力,這一新產品將爲投資者提供一個機會,通過投資於私人房地產資產來增強和分散他們的投資組合,這些資產提供有吸引力的、以收入爲重點的回報,同時對沖通脹。
我們致力於爲股東提供價值,包括通過戰略投資建立和實現價值。爲了履行監管義務,我們在3月份出售了我們在Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited(BSE:ABSLAMC.BO和NSE:ABSLAMC.NS)的6.3%股權,通過產生9,800美元的萬(稅後8,400美元萬)收益釋放了我們的投資價值。隨後,在5月份,我們額外出售了0.2%的所有權權益。自2021年首次公開募股以來,永明人壽已創造了超過45000美元的萬收益(稅後收益超過35000美元萬),同時在最近的一次出售後仍保留了上市實體30%的所有權。這突顯了ABSLAMC的價值,反映了其強勁的業績記錄,擁有包括固定收益、股票和替代產品在內的有吸引力的產品組合,以及在印度快速增長的零售業務。
截至2024年12月31日,股票投資組合多元化,約67%的投資組合投資於交易所交易基金(2023年12月31日-62%)。交易所交易基金持有的資產主要爲ISHARES COR S & P 500 UCITS ETF和Tracker Fund of Hong Kong Ltd。截至2024年12月31日按發行人地區劃分的股票公允價值載於下表。(1)
Based on our historical cash flows and liquidity management processes, we believe that the cash flows from our operating activities will continue to provide sufficient liquidity for us to satisfy debt service obligations and to pay other expenses as they fall due.
(1)This is a non-IFRS financial measure. See section M - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 51
K. Risk Management
1. Risk Management Framework
The Company has an established Risk Management Framework ("Risk Framework") approved by the Board that sets out the components of our risk programs and explains how they operate together in conducting business activities. The risks that arise when providing products and services to Clients, which are in line with our Purpose to help our Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives, are managed within these protocols and programs. Effective risk management is critical to the overall profitability, competitive market positioning, organizational resilience and long-term financial viability of the Company. While all risks cannot necessarily be eliminated or known with certainty, the Risk Framework seeks to ensure that risks to a business undertaking are appropriately managed to achieve the Company's business objectives over time and are not expected to exceed the pre-established boundaries for risk taking. The Risk Framework, corporate strategy and business objectives are all aligned to each other, and the risk management protocols and programs are embedded within every business segment.
52 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
2. Risk Governance and Accountabilities
Our Risk Framework sets out lines of responsibility and authority for risk-taking, governance and control. These governance requirements are summarized below.
Board of Directors
The Board and its committees are responsible for ensuring the governance of all risks across the enterprise and have primary responsibility for ensuring risk management frameworks, policies, programs and practices are in place. By approving our Risk Framework, Risk Appetite Policy, Capital Risk Policy and Capital and Liquidity Management Framework and providing ongoing oversight of the risk management programs, the Board monitors that key risks are appropriately identified and managed. Business and strategic risk is overseen through review and approval of the Business and Strategic Plans, and the Board regularly discusses key themes, issues and risks arising in connection with the design or implementation of these plans.
The Risk Committee is a standing committee of the Board whose primary functions are to assist the Board with oversight of current and emerging risks enterprise-wide, and of the Risk Management function to ensure that management has in place programs, policies, processes and controls designed to identify and effectively manage the significant risks to which the Company is exposed and has sufficient capital to underpin those risks. It reviews and approves all risk management frameworks and policies and reviews compliance with those frameworks and policies. In addition, where the Board has delegated risk oversight to other committees of the Board ("Board Committees"), the Risk Committee provides the Board with an integrated view of oversight of risk management across all Board committees. The Risk Committee regularly monitors the Company's risk profile to ensure it is within the agreed risk appetite and that the Company's capital position exceeds regulatory capital requirements, and monitors and recommends to the Board for approval, the specific risk limits allocated to the businesses and the annual Capital Plan. The Risk Committee also oversees risk management activities of our subsidiaries and joint ventures under the Company's management control and risks posed to the Company through its other joint ventures.
The Governance Committee of the Board is responsible for assisting the Board in overseeing (i) the development of effective corporate governance guidelines and processes, including those addressing the effectiveness of the Board and its committees and director succession planning and recruitment; (ii) the Company's Investment Plan and investment performance, including investment practices, procedures and controls related to the management of the general fund investment portfolio; (iii) sustainability matters including the Company's Sustainability Policy, Sustainability Strategy (including the development of a Climate Transition Plan) and Sustainability Report; and (iv) compliance and compliance management programs, including compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the identification and management of compliance risk, and the development of policies and processes to sustain ethical behaviour. The Committee also serves as the conduct review committee of Sun Life and the conduct review committee for certain subsidiaries of Sun Life that are federally regulated
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 53
financial institutions in accordance with applicable provisions of the Insurance Companies Act (Canada) and Trust and Loan Companies Act (Canada).
The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for assisting the Board in (i) overseeing the integrity of financial statements, disclosures and related information provided to shareholders and other stakeholders, as well as regulatory, tax and litigation matters; (ii) overseeing the compliance with financial regulatory requirements, adequacy and effectiveness of the internal controls implemented and maintained by management; (iii) reviewing and approving the annual internal audit plan, and reviewing the Chief Auditor’s quarterly reports on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls; (iv) reviewing the External Auditor's findings reports and assessing the qualifications, independence and performance of the External Auditor; and (v) reviewing the mandate, resourcing, objectives and succession plans for the Chief Actuary, Chief Auditor and Chief Financial Officer.
The Management Resources Committee of the Board is responsible for assisting the Board with oversight of succession planning for senior executive positions and programs to effectively attract, retain, develop and reward employees. It provides guidance to management on advancing the talent agenda to achieve strategic objectives and foster the Company's culture. The Committee reviews incentive designs and governance of material incentive programs against alignment with business objectives and avoiding excessive risk taking. It reviews the implications of key enterprise risks, including people and culture risks pertaining to compensation design and human resources practices. In addition, the Committee reviews compensation matters, including the remuneration of executives who have a material impact on the risk exposure of the Company.
Senior Management Committees
The Executive Risk Committee ("ERC") provides executive management oversight of the Company's enterprise risk management activities. This includes the review and articulation of the risk appetite and overseeing that the risk profile is within the agreed risk appetite. ERC also oversees that there are policies, processes and controls in place to identify and effectively manage the significant risks. This is done in accordance with the risk appetite and the overall objective of promoting a balanced business and product model to achieve agreed upon risk-adjusted returns and allocate capital accordingly.
The Investment & Credit Risk Committee is responsible for reviewing critical matters related to the on-going management of the Company's General Fund. Accordingly, the Committee is responsible for overseeing, monitoring and reviewing current and potential credit and investment risk exposures, other credit and investment risk management issues and future credit and investment risk management strategies.
The Corporate Asset Liability Management Committee is responsible for providing oversight and input on the Asset Liability Management framework, policies, guidelines, limits, measurement and performance assessment applicable to the management of market and liquidity risks, as well as providing oversight of asset liability management and hedging strategy changes.
The Operational Risk & Compliance Committee is responsible for providing oversight of the Company's operational and compliance risk management practices, current and emerging operational risk exposures, and the processes to ensure ongoing identification of major operational and compliance risks facing the Company.
The Insurance Risk Committee is responsible for providing oversight and direction on insurance risk exposures facing the Company and to ensure that effective insurance risk management practices and controls are in place. This includes reviewing the current and emerging insurance risk profile; engaging in review of topical insurance, reinsurance, underwriting, claims and medical risk issues; and reviewing and recommending changes to the insurance risk appetite measurement methodology.
Accountabilities
Primary accountability for risk management is delegated by the Board to our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). The CEO further delegates responsibilities throughout the Company through management authorities and responsibilities. The CEO delegates accountability for the various classes of risk management to our executive officers, who are accountable for ensuring that the management of risk in the scope of their business accountability is in accordance with the Board approved Risk Framework, Risk Appetite Policy and risk management frameworks and policies.
3. Risk Universe
As a large financial services organization operating in a complex industry, the Company encounters a variety of risks. We face risks in formulating our business strategy and business objectives, in carrying on our business activities in the pursuit of our strategy and objectives, and from external factors. The Risk Framework structures key and emerging risks into a robust, global risk taxonomy comprised of six categories: business and strategic, credit, market, liquidity, insurance and operational risks. The Risk Framework sets out the core processes used to identify, measure, manage, monitor and report risks. The Risk Framework sets out both qualitative and quantitative measures and processes to control the risk the Company will bear in respect of each of these categories of risk and in aggregate.
4. Risk Appetite
Our Risk Appetite Policy defines the amount and type of risk we are willing to accept in pursuit of our business objectives, and is approved by the Board. It is forward-looking and our Strategic Plan, Capital Plan, Business Plan and business objectives are established within its boundaries.
The Company's risk appetite seeks to balance the various needs, expectations, risk and reward perspectives and investment horizons of all stakeholders. In particular, our risk appetite supports the pursuit of shareholder value while ensuring that the Company's ability to pay claims and fulfill policyholder and Client commitments is not compromised.
Our risk appetite is the primary mechanism for operationalizing our risk philosophy and the boundaries of permissible risk-taking across the enterprise. Our risk appetite supports the objective of maintaining adequate capital, managing earnings volatility, managing operational risk
54 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
and managing liquidity. To accomplish this, our risk appetite includes a wide array of qualitative and quantitative standards that reflect the Company's overall risk management principles and values.
We are generally comfortable accepting diversifiable risks where we are capable of using risk pooling to create liability portfolios with relatively low volatility. We take risk where we have internal expertise such as actuarial, underwriting, claims management, investment, risk management and distribution or where reinsurance partners are able to supplement our internal expertise. We prefer risks that arise across various dimensions, including products, geographies (intra-national and international), distribution channels and asset classes in order to maximize diversification benefits.
Our Risk Appetite Policy sets out multiple constraints which define the aggregate level of risk that the Company is willing to accept. We translate our risk appetite constraints into specific risk limits by risk class and business segment. Our risk profile is measured, managed and monitored regularly to ensure that we operate within our risk appetite. Our risk appetite limits are revised periodically to reflect the risks and opportunities inherent in our evolving business strategies and operating environment.
5. Risk Management Policies
In order to support the effective communication, implementation and governance of our Risk Framework, we have codified our processes and operational requirements into a comprehensive series of risk management frameworks, policies and operating guidelines. These frameworks, policies and guidelines promote the application of a consistent approach to managing risk exposures across our global business platform. The Board and Board Committees regularly review and approve significant changes to risk management frameworks and policies and regularly review management's reporting and attestation on compliance to these frameworks and policies.
6. Risk Management Process
All business segments employ a common approach to identify, measure, manage, monitor and report risks. The risk management process as set out in our Risk Framework is described below:
Risk Identification
Business segments have accountability for identifying and managing risks facing their business. We have a process to identify and monitor key and emerging risks that may have a material impact on our finances, operations or reputation. We evaluate potential correlations and inter-connections between various risk events and categories, and monitor key and emerging risks, emerging regulatory and rating agency requirements, or industry developments and various research reports.
Risk Measurement
Risk measurement involves determining and evaluating potential risk exposures and includes a number of techniques, including:
•Key risk indicators
•Probability-severity assessments
•Stress testing (including sensitivity and scenario analysis)
•Reverse stress testing
•Stochastic modelling
Risk measures are expressed in quantitative and qualitative terms.
A robust stress testing program forms an essential component of the Company's risk management program used to measure, monitor, understand and mitigate the Company's risk exposures and to ensure ongoing capital adequacy under plausible stress events. Stress testing is performed on key metrics such as earnings, regulatory capital ratios and liquidity to identify and monitor potential vulnerabilities to key risk drivers and ensure that the Company is operating within its risk appetite.
We develop and test a range of scenarios based on our internal assessment and regulatory guidance. Emerging risks are one of the inputs to determine stress test scenarios.
•Sensitivity testing is conducted on a regular basis and measures the earnings and regulatory capital and liquidity impacts from changes in underlying risk factors, assuming that there are no changes to any of the other risk factors. Sensitivity testing is performed for individual risks and for consolidated risk exposures at different levels of stress and at various levels of aggregation.
•Scenario testing involves changes to a number of risk factors to assess the impact of and interaction between these risk factors. These scenarios include integrated scenario testing, reverse scenario testing and key assumption sensitivity testing.
•Financial Condition Testing ("FCT"), as prescribed by the Canadian Institute of Actuaries, is used to satisfy requirements under the Canadian insurance Company Act, and OSFI regulations. Through stress testing selected adverse scenarios, the main objectives of FCT is to identify possible threats to our financial condition and the corrective management actions to mitigate those threats.
Risk Management
Risk management decisions are formed by evaluating whether the assessed risk for a business activity aligns with our risk appetite and meets the objective of risk-adjusted returns.
Risk Monitoring
Monitoring processes include oversight by the Board, which is exercised through Board Committees and Senior Management committees described in the Risk Governance and Accountabilities section in this document.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 55
Risk Reporting
At least on a quarterly basis, the Senior Management committees, Board Committees and the Board review reports that summarize our risk profile against the Board approved risk appetite, including the exposures across our principal risks, any changes in risk trends, forward-looking view of risks and emerging risks. These committees also review the effectiveness of the risk management strategies presented in the reports. On a regular basis, the Board and the Board Committees review and approve any significant changes to risk management frameworks and policies for the management of risk and review compliance with these frameworks and policies.
7. Three Lines of Defence
The Company’s risk governance allocates accountability and functional responsibilities through the adoptions of the Three Lines of Defence (“LOD”) model to ensure appropriate oversight. This segregation of responsibility helps to establish a robust control framework that promotes transparent and independent challenge of all risk-taking activities, and that encourages all functions to engage in self-critical examination to foster continuous improvement of the management of risk in our business.
The first LOD is represented by the business segment management who own the risks that are intrinsic to the business and have the primary responsibility to identify, measure, manage, monitor and report these risks. Some of the first LOD risk related responsibilities include:
•Identification of key and emerging risks;
•Manage, measure, monitor and report on risk within their business operations;
•Accountability for business results and the risks taken to achieve business results and the resulting impact of those risks; and
•Operating within risk appetite and according to risk management frameworks and policies;
•Cultivating a strong risk corporate culture.
The second LOD includes the Chief Risk Officer ("CRO") and heads of the oversight functions who are responsible for providing independent oversight of our Company-wide risk management programs. The CRO is responsible for developing our Risk Framework and Risk Appetite Policy, and for overseeing the development and implementation of risk management strategies aimed at optimizing the risk-return profile of the Company. The CRO is supported by a network of business segment risk officers. The functional heads support the CRO in the implementation and communication of our Risk Framework and Risk Appetite Policy. Some of the key second LOD risk related responsibilities include:
•Establishment of the risk management framework and policies;
•Providing oversight and effective independent challenge of first LOD; and
•Independent reporting to Senior Management committees and the Board of Directors on the level of risk against risk appetite.
The third LOD responsibilities are distinct from first and second LOD responsibilities. The Internal Audit function is the third LOD and is responsible for providing independent assurance to Senior Management and the Board and/or Board Committees on the design and operational effectiveness of the risk management practices and internal controls carried out by first LOD and second LOD. Internal Audit provides a quarterly opinion on the effectiveness of internal controls, risk management and governance processes to the Audit Committee of the Board. In addition, the Risk Committee may engage third-party independent reviews to supplement the third LOD review of the effectiveness of the Company's risk management programs.
8. Culture and Philosophy
We have built a strong corporate culture reflected in our core values of being Caring, Authentic, Bold, Inspiring and Impactful. These values set the tone and guide our high business standards, integrity and ethical behaviour, respect, and commitment to doing the right thing for our Clients.
The Board establishes the "tone from the top" and is accountable to ensure that the CEO and Senior Management create and sustain a culture of integrity throughout the organization. We work together through our focus on long-term, sustainable and resilient thinking to maximize our positive impact and ensure the resiliency of our organization, in support of our Purpose of helping our Clients to achieve lifetime financial security and to live healthier lives.
A key premise of our culture management framework is that everyone has an important role to play in preserving and enhancing our culture, which includes managing the Company’s risks. In order to support employees in fulfilling their role in managing the Company's risks, we have taken action to ensure our risk protocols and procedures are well defined and embedded in our day-to-day business activities, assess that appropriate resources and training are provided, establish and communicate a common risk philosophy and a high bar for integrity and conduct, and encourage every employee to openly identify risk exposures and communicate escalating risk concerns. The following elements support our culture:
•Setting core values to guide decision making
•Establishing tone from the top;
•Encouraging transparency in risk-taking;
•Performing effective challenge in conducting business decisions;
•Aligning incentives and risk management practices;
•Effectively communicating culture expectations;
•Establishing clear accountabilities; and
•Promoting ongoing resiliency
Risk Management is embedded in the enterprise's culture, which encourages ownership and responsibility for risk management at all levels. Our compensation programs are aligned to the organization's risk management practices through our governance structure for the design and approval of incentive compensation plans and processes used to support the alignment of compensation and risk management. We continuously reinforce and embed the accountability for risk management through communication and training on risk management at various forums and across various levels through training on the Code of Conduct annually, reinforcing accountability through performance reviews and compensation, continually monitoring processes and outcomes that drive expected behaviours, and through defining roles, responsibilities and expectations in the risk management frameworks and policies.
56 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The Company's risk philosophy includes the following core principles:
Strategic Alignment
Our corporate strategy and business objectives are required to be established within the boundaries and prescriptions set out in the Risk Framework and the Risk Appetite Policy. This requires us to consider whether a business activity, intended to achieve the business and financial objectives, will result in a risk profile that we are willing to accept and which we are prepared to manage. We have established a range of explicit risk appetite constraints that we apply to all acceptable risks. Business and strategic risk is managed through our strategic and business planning process and through controls over the implementation of these Strategic and Business Plans. Risks associated with activities outside our risk appetite or outside the acceptable defined risks are avoided.
Capital and Liquidity Management
Maintaining adequate capital is essential to the continued operations of the Company and Subsidiaries. We assess and forecast capital adequacy on an on-going basis to operate in a safe and sound manner and to maintain adequate capital in relation to the risks associated with our business activities and strategy. Capital adequacy is assessed across all our businesses using the annual strategy and business planning processes and the annual ORSA process and is monitored on a regular basis. The level of capital adequacy risk accepted by the Company and Subsidiaries is required to be prudent and consistent with the principles, frameworks and policies outlined in the Risk Management Framework and Risk Appetite Policy. Capital adequacy risk is mitigated through adherence to risk management frameworks, policies and processes.
Maintaining adequate liquidity is critical to the protection of our policyholders, Clients and creditors and to maintaining ratings and access to capital markets.
Client and Other Stakeholder Interests
Our Risk Appetite Policy considers the interests of a large number of key stakeholders, including Clients, shareholders, debt-holders, employees, regulators, distributors, rating agencies and other capital markets participants. The policy prescribes how to balance the needs, expectations, risk and reward perspectives, and investment horizons of these different stakeholders. The Business Plans and business strategies are independently tested validated to ensure that they operate within the boundaries and requirements set out in the Risk Framework and the Risk Appetite Policy, and the results of this testing validation are reported to the Board.
Effective risk management requires that objectives and incentives be aligned to ensure management's decisions are consistent with the Company's risk philosophy and risk appetite. Compensation programs for employees are approved by the Board and the Board Committees and are aligned with the Company's risk philosophy, values, business and risk management strategies, and the long-term interests of stakeholders. In establishing annual performance objectives, we consider risk management goals to ensure that business decisions are consistent with the desired risk and return profile of the Company.
Capability Alignment
We seek out profitable risk-taking opportunities in those areas where we have established risk management skills and capabilities. Conversely, we endeavour to avoid or transfer risks that are beyond our risk-taking capability. Our ability to measure and evaluate risks, the quality of our risk governance and control environment, the depth and quality of our risk responses and the robustness of our pricing strategies are particularly important capabilities that we assess.
Portfolio Perspective
In evaluating a particular risk, consideration is given to a portfolio perspective of risk and return including the explicit recognition of the impacts of diversification and concentration and how different risks interact with each other. This perspective is extended to the development of risk mitigation and pricing strategies, recognizing that often the most cost-effective way of managing risk involves utilizing available relationships already inherent in our businesses.
Risk-Adjusted Returns
Financial return metrics used to assess business activities are developed in consideration of the constraints set out in the Risk Appetite Policy, and reflect the expected costs of mitigation and the cost of risk capital required to support the risk taking activity.
Understanding and Managing Uncertainties
While many risks are relatively well understood and measurable, there are risks that do not lend themselves to traditional metrics. We refer to these as “uncertainties”. These include geopolitical and environmental risks which are difficult to quantify and can have widespread contagion effects. It is important for the organization to not just analyse risks in silos but anticipate and prepare for uncertain events given the potential spillover of impacts onto other related risks. Rigorous and thoughtful table-top exercises should be convened as appropriate to understand the potential impacts and ramifications of plausible risk uncertainties and implement resiliency strategies.
Organizational Resilience
With various external challenges and increasing threats, it is key for the organization to maintain and enhance resiliency as a best practice. The capability to adapt in ever-changing conditions and a commitment to taking a resilient approach, are crucial in managing key vulnerabilities and delivering objectives in the face of business disruptions.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 57
Culture
Culture is the sum of the shared assumptions, values and beliefs that create the unique character of an organization. Our culture encourages behaviour aligned with goals for long-term value creation. It defines the appropriate behaviour for any given situation, governs the interaction with Clients and affects how employees identify with the organization. Our culture has significant potential to impact our risk profile. An organization's culture impacts its ability to create value and to protect value. Maintaining the right balance of risk-taking and risk control activities is a key organizational capability and fundamental to our long-term sustainable success.
Long-Term, Sustainable and Resilient
Our risk philosophy addresses the Company’s material economic, environmental and social impacts, and the opportunities and risks they present in delivering long-term value to the key stakeholders for the Company. We aspire to maximize our positive impact and ensure the resilience of our organization, in support of our Purpose of helping Clients achieve lifetime financial security and live healthier lives. Frameworks, policies, processes and controls are in place to identify and effectively manage significant risks to which we are exposed while operating within the Risk Appetite Policy.
9. Risk Categories
The text and tables in the following section of this MD&A include our disclosure on credit, market and liquidity risks in accordance with IFRS 7 Financial Instruments - Disclosures ("IFRS 7") and IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts, as well as a discussion on how we measure risk and our objectives, policies and methodologies for managing these risks. Disclosures in accordance with IFRS 7 and IFRS 17 are identified by a vertical line in the left margin of the page. The fact that certain text and tables are identified with a vertical line does not imply that these disclosures are of any greater importance than any other text or tables, and the Risk Management disclosure should be read in its entirely.
The disclosures in the Risk Management section of this document should be considered carefully together with other information in this MD&A and in the 2024 AIF, our Consolidated Financial Statements and other reports and materials that we file with securities regulators.
In this section, segregated funds include segregated fund guarantees, variable annuities and investment products, and includes Run-off reinsurance in U.S. IFM.
Our Risk Framework groups all risks into six major risk categories: market, insurance, credit, business and strategic, operational and liquidity risks.
i. Market Risk
Risk Description
We are exposed to market risk, which is defined as the risk that the value or future cash flows of insurance and investment contract liabilities or financial assets will fluctuate because of changes or volatility in market prices. Market risk includes equity, interest rate and spread, real estate, foreign currency, and inflation risks.
Market Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of market risk management practices and controls as outlined below:
•Market risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Risk Committee.
•Income and regulatory capital sensitivities are monitored, managed, and reported against pre-established risk appetite limits for equity, interest rate, credit spread, real estate and foreign currency risks.
•Comprehensive asset-liability management and hedging policies, programs and practices are in place.
•Regulatory solvency requirements include risk-based capital requirements and are monitored regularly.
•Product Design and Pricing Policy requires a detailed risk assessment and pricing provisions for material risks.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse market movements.
•Insurance contract liabilities are established in accordance with IFRS.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
Specific market risks and our risk management strategies are discussed below in further detail.
Equity Risk
Equity risk is the potential for financial loss arising from declines or volatility in public or private equity market prices. We are exposed to equity risk from a number of sources.
We generate revenue in our asset management businesses and from certain protection and wealth contracts where fees are levied on account balances that are affected directly by equity market levels. Accordingly, we have further exposure to equity risk as adverse fluctuations in the market value of such assets will result in corresponding adverse impacts on revenue, income, the contractual service margin, and capital. In addition, declining and volatile equity markets may have a negative impact on sales and redemptions (surrenders) in these businesses, and this may result in further adverse impacts on net income, the contractual service margin, and capital.
58 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
A portion of our exposure to equity risk arises in connection with benefit guarantees on segregated fund products, some participating insurance contracts, some adjustable insurance contracts, and some universal life contracts. These benefit guarantees may be triggered upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization. The cost of providing these guarantees is uncertain and depends upon a number of factors, including general capital market conditions, our hedging strategies, policyholder behaviour and mortality experience, each of which may result in negative impacts on net income, the contractual service margin, and capital.
We also have direct exposure to equity markets from the investments supporting other general account liabilities, surplus, and employee benefit plans. These exposures fall within our risk-taking philosophy and appetite, and are therefore generally not hedged.
Interest Rate and Spread Risk
Interest rate and spread risk includes the potential for financial loss arising from changes in the value of insurance and investment contract liabilities and financial assets due to changes or volatility in interest rates or spreads. In practice, when asset cash flows and the policy obligations they support are not matched, this may result in the need to either sell assets to meet policy payments and expenses or reinvest excess asset cash flows in unfavourable interest rate or credit spread environments. This risk is managed in our asset-liability management program. Details of the asset-liability management program are discussed under the heading "Market Risk Management Strategies" in section K - Risk Management in this document.
Our primary exposure to interest rate and spread risk arises from insurance and investment contracts that contain guarantees in the form of minimum crediting rates, maximum premium rates, settlement options, guaranteed annuitization options and minimum benefits. If investment returns fall below guaranteed levels, we may be required to increase liabilities or capital in respect of these contracts. The guarantees attached to these products may be applicable to both past premiums collected and future premiums not yet received. Segregated fund contracts provide benefit guarantees that are linked to underlying fund performance and may be triggered upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization. Exposure to guarantees is managed within our risk appetite limits through our asset-liability management program, which may include the use of hedging strategies utilizing interest rate derivatives such as interest rate floors, swaps, futures and swaptions. The impact of these guarantees on net income, contractual service margin, and capital are included in the disclosed market risk sensitivities.
Significant changes or volatility in interest rates or spreads could have a negative impact on sales of certain protection and wealth products, and adversely impact the expected pattern of redemptions (surrenders) on existing policies.
•Increases in interest rates or widening credit spreads may increase the risk that policyholders will surrender their contracts, potentially forcing us to liquidate assets at a loss. While we have established hedging programs in place and our protection and wealth products often contain surrender mitigation features, these may not be sufficient to fully offset the adverse impact of changes in interest rates or spreads.
•Declines in interest rates or narrowing spreads can result in compression of the net spread between interest earned on investments and interest credited to policyholders, increased asset calls, mortgage and structured security prepayments, and net reinvestment of positive cash flows at lower yields, and therefore can adversely impact our profitability and financial position.
•Negative interest rates may additionally result in losses on our cash and short-term deposits and low or negative returns on our fixed income assets impacting our profitability.
•A sustained low interest rate environment may additionally adversely impact our net income, CSM, capital, and our ability to implement our business strategy and plans. This may be realized through lower sales, less profitable new business, changes in the pattern of redemptions on existing policies, among other impacts.
We also have direct exposure to interest rates and spreads from investments supporting other general account liabilities, surplus and employee benefit plans. Higher interest rates or wider spreads will reduce the value of our existing assets. Conversely, lower interest rates or a narrowing of spreads will result in reduced investment income on new fixed income asset purchases. These exposures fall within our risk-taking philosophy and appetite and are therefore generally not hedged.
Real Estate Risk
Real estate risk is the potential for financial loss arising from fluctuations in the value of, or future cash flows from, our investments in real estate. We are exposed to real estate risk and may experience financial losses resulting from the direct ownership of real estate investments or indirectly through fixed income investments secured by real estate property, leasehold interests, ground rents, and purchase and leaseback transactions.
Real estate price risk may arise from external market conditions, inadequate property analysis, inadequate insurance coverage, inappropriate real estate appraisals, or from environmental risk exposures.
We hold real estate investments that support general account liabilities and surplus, and fluctuations in value will affect our net income, CSM, and capital. A material and sustained increase in interest rates may lead to deterioration in real estate values.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 59
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency risk is the result of mismatches in the currency of our assets and liabilities (inclusive of capital), and cash flows. This risk may arise from a variety of sources such as foreign currency transactions and services, foreign currency hedging, investments denominated in foreign currencies, investments in foreign subsidiaries and net income from foreign operations. Changes or volatility in foreign exchange rates, including a change to currencies that are fixed in value to another currency, could adversely affect our net income, contractual service margin and capital.
As an international provider of financial services, we operate in a number of countries, with revenues and expenses denominated in several local currencies. In each country in which we operate, we generally maintain the currency profile of assets to match the currency of liabilities and required capital. This approach provides an operational hedge against disruptions in local operations caused by currency fluctuations. Foreign currency derivative contracts such as currency swaps and forwards are used as a risk management tool to manage the currency exposure in accordance with our Asset Liability Management Policy. As at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company did not have a material foreign currency risk exposure.
Changes in exchange rates can affect our net income and surplus when financial results in functional currencies are translated into Canadian dollars. Net income earned outside of Canada is generally not currency hedged and a weakening in the local currency of our foreign operations relative to the Canadian dollar can have a negative impact on our net income reported in Canadian currency. A strengthening in the local currency of our foreign operations relative to the Canadian dollar would have the opposite effect. Regulatory capital ratios could also be impacted by changes in exchange rates.
Inflation Risk
Inflation risk is the potential for financial loss arising from changes in inflation rates. This risk results from insurance contract liabilities that are linked to market measures of inflation such as the Consumer Price Index. The primary sources for this risk exposure are from certain group and retail annuity contracts and group long term disability contracts. In these contracts, the annuity and disability benefit payments may be linked to an indexing formula containing an inflation price index. Benefit payments linked to inflation indices may also include various caps, floors and averaging mechanisms that vary across product designs.
Exposure to inflation risk is managed within our asset-liability management program, primarily by investing in inflation linked assets to match liability exposures.
The impact of inflation on general account expenses is discussed under the heading "Expense Risk" in section K - Risk Management in this document.
Market Risk Sensitivities
We utilize a variety of methods and measures to quantify our market risk exposures. These include duration management, key rate duration techniques, convexity measures, cash flow gap analysis, scenario testing, and sensitivity testing of earnings and regulatory capital ratios versus risk appetite limits.
The measurement of liabilities and assets are affected by the level of equity market performance, interest rates, credit and swap spreads and other market risk variables. The following sections set out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our net income(1), contractual service margin, OCI and SLF Inc.'s LICAT ratio to certain instantaneous changes in market variables as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
The estimated sensitivities in the tables below reflect the impact of market movements on insurance contracts and investment contracts, assets backing insurance contracts, assets backing investment contracts, assets backing the surplus segment, and seed investments in our asset management subsidiaries.
Net income sensitivities to equity and real estate market movements are driven primarily by changes in the value of investments backing general account liabilities and surplus. Net income sensitivities to interest rates and spreads are driven by the net impact on liabilities and the assets backing them. Lower interest rates or a narrowing of spreads will result in increased liabilities for insurance contracts, offset by increased values of the assets backing general liabilities. Higher interest rates or a widening of spreads will result in decreased liabilities for insurance contracts, offset by decreased values of the assets backing general account liabilities. Further detail on the impact of changes or volatility in market prices on assets and liabilities is provided under the headings "Equity Risk", "Interest Rate and Spread Risk", and "Real Estate Risk" above.
OCI sensitivities are impacted by changes in the market value of assets classified as FVOCI. The market value of FVOCI fixed income assets, which are held primarily backing surplus, investment contracts and CSM liabilities, increases with lower interest rates or a narrowing of spreads, and decreases with higher interest rates or widening of spreads.
As these market risk sensitivities reflect an instantaneous impact on net income, CSM, OCI and SLF Inc.'s LICAT ratio, they do not include impacts over time such as the effect on fee income in our asset management businesses.
Refer to Additional Cautionary Language and Key Assumptions Related to Sensitivities in this section for important additional information regarding these estimates.
(1)Net income in section K - Risk Management in this document refers to common shareholders' net income.
60 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Private and Public Equity Market Sensitivities
The following table sets out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our net income, CSM, OCI and SLF Inc.'s LICAT ratio to certain instantaneous changes in public or private equity market prices as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. The sensitivities shown outline the impact of the same percentage increase or decrease applied to each of private equity and public equity. About 60% of our expected net income sensitivity to changes in equity markets is driven by investments in private equity.
($ millions, unless otherwise noted)
As at December 31, 2024
Change in Private and Public Equity Markets(1)(2)(3)
25% decrease
10% decrease
10% increase
25% increase
Potential impact on net income
(after-tax)
(550)
(225)
225
575
Potential impact on CSM (pre-tax)
(775)
(300)
275
650
Potential impact on OCI(4)
—
—
—
—
Potential impact on LICAT ratio(5)
2.0% point decrease
0.5% point decrease
0.5% point increase
1.0% point increase
($ millions, unless otherwise noted)
As at December 31, 2023
Change in Private and Public Equity Markets(1)(2)(3)
25% decrease
10% decrease
10% increase
25% increase
Potential impact on net income
(after-tax)
(400)
(175)
175
425
Potential impact on CSM (pre-tax)
(625)
(250)
250
600
Potential impact on OCI(4)
—
—
—
—
Potential impact on LICAT ratio(5)
3.0% point decrease
1.0% point decrease
1.0% point increase
2.5% point increase
(1)Represents the respective change across all equity exposures as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. Due to the impact of active management, basis risk, and other factors, realized sensitivities may differ significantly from expectations. Sensitivities include the impact of re-balancing equity hedges for hedging programs at 2% intervals (for 10% changes in equity markets) and at 5% intervals (for 25% changes in equity markets).
(2)The market risk sensitivities include the estimated impact of our hedging programs in effect as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, and include new business added and product changes implemented prior to such dates.
(3)Net income, CSM and OCI sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million. The sensitivities exclude the market impacts on the income from our joint ventures in China and India.
(4) The market risk OCI sensitivities exclude the impact of changes in the defined benefit obligations and plan assets.
(5)The LICAT sensitivities illustrate the impact on SLF Inc. as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. LICAT ratios are rounded in increments of 0.5%.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 61
Interest Rate Sensitivities
The following table sets out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our net income, CSM, OCI and SLF Inc.'s LICAT ratio to certain instantaneous changes in interest rates as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
($ millions, unless otherwise noted)
As at December 31, 2024
As at December 31, 2023
Change in Interest Rates(1)(2)(3)
50 basis point decrease
50 basis point increase
50 basis point decrease
50 basis point increase
Potential impact on net income
(after-tax)
(50)
25
(25)
50
Potential impact on CSM (pre-tax)
150
(150)
75
(75)
Potential impact on OCI(4)
200
(200)
200
(200)
Potential impact on LICAT ratio(5)
2.5% point increase
2.0% point decrease
1.5% point increase
1.5% point decrease
(1)Interest rate sensitivities assume a parallel shift in assumed interest rates across the entire yield curve as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 with no change to the ultimate risk-free rate. Variations in realized yields based on factors such as different terms to maturity and geographies may result in realized sensitivities being significantly different from those illustrated above. Sensitivities include the impact of re-balancing interest rate hedges for hedging programs at 10 basis point intervals (for 50 basis point changes in interest rates).
(2)The market risk sensitivities include the estimated impact of our hedging programs in effect as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, and include new business added and product changes implemented prior to such dates.
(3)Net income, CSM and OCI sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million. The sensitivities exclude the market impacts on the income from our joint ventures in China and India.
(4)The market risk OCI sensitivities exclude the impact of changes in the defined benefit obligations and plan assets.
(5)The LICAT sensitivities illustrate the impact on SLF Inc. as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. The sensitivities reflect the worst scenario as at December 31, 2024 and assume that a scenario switch does not occur in the quarter. LICAT ratios are rounded in increments of 0.5%.
The above sensitivities were determined using a 50 basis point change in interest rates and 10% and 25% changes in our equity markets because we believe that these market shocks were reasonably possible as at December 31, 2024. Significant changes in market variables may result in other than proportionate impacts on our sensitivities.
Potential Impact of Change in Ultimate Risk-Free Rate
Interest rate sensitivities do not include any impact from changes to the ultimate risk-free rate. Our estimated sensitivity to a 10 basis point decrease in the ultimate risk-free rate assumed in our insurance contract liabilities is a decrease in reported net income of approximately $50 million after-tax, and a decrease in CSM of approximately $25 million.
Credit Spread and Swap Sensitivities
The following tables set out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our net income, CSM, OCI and SLF Inc.'s LICAT ratio to certain instantaneous changes in credit spreads and our net income, CSM, and OCI to certain changes in swap spreads as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
($ millions, unless otherwise noted)
As at December 31, 2024
As at December 31, 2023
Change in Credit Spreads(1)(2)
50 basis point decrease
50 basis point increase
50 basis point decrease
50 basis point increase
Potential impact on net income
(after-tax)
75
(50)
50
(50)
Potential impact on CSM (pre-tax)
125
(125)
75
(25)
Potential impact on OCI(3)
200
(200)
200
(175)
Potential impact on LICAT ratio(4)
2.0% point increase
2.0% point decrease
1.0% point increase
1.0% point decrease
(1)The credit spread sensitivities assume a parallel shift in the indicated spreads across the entire term structure with no change to the ultimate liquidity premium. The sensitivities reflect a floor of zero on credit spreads where the spreads are not currently negative. Variations in realized spread changes based on different terms to maturity, geographies, asset classes and derivative types, underlying interest rate movements, and ratings may result in realized sensitivities being significantly different from those provided above.
(2)Net income, CSM, and OCI sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million. The sensitivities exclude the market impacts on the income from our joint ventures in China and India.
(3)The market risk OCI sensitivities exclude the impact of changes in the defined benefit obligations and plan assets.
(4)The LICAT sensitivities illustrate the impact on SLF Inc. as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. The sensitivities reflect the worst scenario as of December 31, 2024 and assume that a scenario switch does not occur in the quarter. LICAT ratios are rounded in increments of 0.5%.
62 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
($ millions, unless otherwise noted)
As at December 31, 2024
As at December 31, 2023
Change in Swap Spreads(1)(2)
20 basis point decrease
20 basis point increase
20 basis point decrease
20 basis point increase
Potential impact on net income
(after-tax)
(25)
25
(25)
25
(1)The swap spread sensitivities assume a parallel shift in the indicated spreads across the entire term structure. Variations in realized spread changes based on different terms to maturity, geographies, asset classes and derivative types, underlying interest rate movements, and ratings may result in realized sensitivities being significantly different from those provided above.
(2)Net income, CSM, and OCI sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million. The sensitivities exclude the market impacts on the income from our joint ventures in China and India.
Real Estate Sensitivities
The following table sets out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, our net income, OCI and CSM to certain instantaneous changes in the value of our real estate investments as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
($ millions, unless otherwise noted)
As at December 31, 2024
As at December 31, 2023
Change in Real Estate Values (1)
10% decrease
10% increase
10% decrease
10% increase
Potential impact on net income (after-tax)
(450)
450
(475)
475
Potential impact on CSM (pre-tax)
(100)
100
(100)
100
(1)Net income, CSM, and OCI sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million. The sensitivities exclude the market impacts on the income from our joint ventures in China and India.
LICAT Interest Rate Scenario Switch
The LICAT interest rate risk is assessed under four different interest rate scenarios, and the scenario leading to the highest capital requirement is chosen as the worst scenario for each geographic region as defined by the LICAT guideline. Changes and interaction between the level and term movements in interest rates and credit spreads can shift the interest rate scenario applied in the LICAT calculation causing a discontinuity where capital requirements change materially. In 2020, OSFI updated the LICAT guideline for interest rate risk requirements for participating businesses to be smoothed over six quarters. As a result, the actual impact to the LICAT ratio from participating businesses in any quarter will reflect the scenarios from current quarter as well as the prior five quarters and switching between the scenarios would have the effect of offsetting the previous impacts over time. It should be noted that switching of the scenario can also change the direction of our sensitivities.
For SLF Inc., assuming no further scenario switches, no additional LICAT ratio impact is expected over the next five quarters.
For Sun Life Assurance, assuming no further scenario switches, the remaining impact of one-half percentage point is expected to increase the LICAT ratio over the next five quarters.
Market Risk Management Strategies
Market risk is managed at all stages during the product life cycle including product design and development, ongoing review and positioning of our suite of products, and ongoing asset-liability management and hedge re-balancing. Our market risk management strategies are developed based on policies and operating guidelines at the enterprise level, business segment level and product level. Liabilities having a similar risk profile are grouped together and a customized investment and hedging strategy is developed and implemented to optimize return within our risk appetite limits.
We have implemented asset-liability management and hedging programs involving regular monitoring and adjustment of market risk exposures using assets, derivative instruments and repurchase agreements to maintain market risk exposures within our risk appetite. The general availability and cost of these hedging instruments may be adversely impacted by a number of factors including changes in interest rates, increased volatility in capital markets, and changes in the general market and regulatory environment within which these hedging programs operate. In particular, regulations for derivatives could impose additional costs and could affect our hedging strategy.
Our hedging programs may themselves expose us to other risks, including basis risk, volatility risk, and increased levels of derivative counterparty credit risk, liquidity risk, model risk and other operational risks. These factors may adversely impact the net effectiveness, costs, and financial viability of maintaining these hedging programs and therefore adversely impact our profitability and financial position. While our hedging programs are intended to mitigate these effects (e.g., hedge counterparty credit risk is managed by maintaining broad diversification, dealing primarily with highly-rated counterparties, and transacting through over-the-counter ("OTC") contracts cleared through central clearing houses, exchange-traded contracts or bilateral OTC contracts negotiated directly between counterparties that include credit support annexes), residual risk, potential reported earnings and capital volatility remain.
In general, market risk exposure is mitigated by the assets supporting our products. This includes holdings of fixed income assets such as bonds, mortgages and loans. Derivative instruments may supplement these assets to reduce the risk from interest rate mismatches and mitigate the market risk associated with liability features and optionality.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 63
General Account Protection and Wealth Products
Most of our expected net income sensitivity to changes in interest rates and equity markets is derived from our general account protection and wealth products. We have implemented market risk management strategies to mitigate a portion of the market risk related to our general account protection and wealth products.
Individual protection products include universal life and other long-term life and health insurance products. Major sources of market risk exposure for individual protection products include the reinvestment risk related to future premiums on regular premium policies, asset reinvestment risk on both regular premium and single premium policies and the guaranteed cost of insurance. Interest rate risk for individual protection products is typically managed on a duration basis, within tolerance ranges set out in the applicable investment policy or guidelines. Targets and limits are established so that the level of residual exposure is commensurate with our risk appetite. Exposures are monitored frequently, and assets are re-balanced as necessary to maintain compliance within prescribed tolerances using a combination of assets and derivative instruments. A portion of the longer-term cash flows are backed with equities and real estate.
For participating insurance products and other protection products with adjustable features, the investment strategy objective is to provide a total rate of return given a constant risk profile over the long term.
Fixed annuity products generally provide the policyholder with a guaranteed investment return or crediting rate. Interest rate risk for these products is typically managed on a duration basis, within tolerance ranges set out in the applicable investment guidelines. Targets and limits are established so that the level of residual exposure is commensurate with our risk appetite. Exposures are monitored frequently, and assets are re-balanced as necessary to maintain compliance within prescribed tolerances using a combination of fixed income assets and derivative instruments.
Certain protection and wealth products contain minimum interest rate guarantees. Market risk management strategies are implemented to limit potential financial loss due to reductions in asset earned rates relative to contract guarantees. These typically involve the use of hedging strategies utilizing interest rate derivatives such as interest rate floors, swaps and swaptions.
Indexed universal life products contain features that credit policyholders the return of underlying equity indices, subject to defined caps, floors and participation rates. Dynamic hedging strategies utilizing equity derivatives are implemented to replicate the policyholder returns and to limit the potential risk of equity guarantees to within our risk appetite tolerances.
Certain protection and wealth products contain features which allow the policyholders to surrender their policy at book value. Market risk management strategies are implemented to limit the potential financial loss due to changes in interest rate levels and policyholder behaviour. These typically involve the use of dynamic hedging strategies and the purchase of interest rate swaptions.
Certain products have guaranteed minimum annuitization rates. Market risk management strategies are implemented to limit the potential financial loss and typically involve the use of fixed income assets, interest rate swaps, and swaptions.
Segregated Funds Products
Certain segregated fund products provide benefit guarantees, which are linked to underlying fund performance and may be triggered upon death, maturity, withdrawal or annuitization. The cost of providing these guarantees is uncertain and depends upon a number of factors including general capital market conditions, our hedging activities, policyholder behaviour and mortality experience, each of which may result in negative impacts on net income, the contractual service margin and capital.
Our hedging programs use derivative instruments and fixed income assets to mitigate the interest rate, equity market, and foreign currency exposure of our segregated fund contracts. Materially all of our segregated fund contracts, as measured by fund values, are included in a hedging program. While materially all contracts are included in the hedging program, not all of our market risk exposure related to these contracts is hedged. For those segregated fund contracts included in the hedging program, we generally hedge the value of expected future net claims costs and associated risk adjustments for non-financial risk.
Our hedging strategy is applied both at the line of business or product level and at the total company level using a combination of hedging techniques such as re-balancing of short-dated interest rate and equity derivative contracts and longer-dated put options. We actively monitor our overall market exposure and may implement tactical hedge overlay strategies in order to align sensitivities with risk management objectives.
The impact of segregated fund guarantees and associated hedging programs on net income, contractual service margin and capital are included in the disclosed market risk sensitivities.
64 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Market Risk Management Applications for Derivative Usage
The primary uses of derivatives are set out in the table below as at December 31, 2024.
Products/Application
Uses of Derivative
Derivatives Used
General asset-liability management - interest rate risk exposure for most protection and wealth products
To manage the sensitivity of the duration gap between assets and liabilities to interest rate changes
Interest rate swaps, swaptions, floors and bond forwards and futures
Guarantees on protection and wealth contracts - minimum interest rate guarantees, guaranteed surrender values and guaranteed annuitization options
To limit potential financial losses from significant reductions in asset earned rates relative to contract guarantees
Interest rate swaps, swaptions, floors and bond forwards and futures
Segregated fund guarantees & indexed universal life
To manage the exposure of product guarantees sensitive to movement in equity market and interest rate levels and currency fluctuations
Put options, call options, futures and swaps on equity indices, interest rate swaps, bond forwards and futures, and foreign exchange forwards
Currency exposure in relation to asset-liability management
To reduce the sensitivity to currency fluctuations by matching the value and cash flows of specific assets denominated in one currency with the value and cash flows of the corresponding liabilities denominated in another currency
Currency swaps and forwards
Credit exposure
To replicate credit exposures and enhance investment returns
Credit default swaps
Additional Cautionary Language and Key Assumptions Related to Sensitivities
Our market risk sensitivities are measures of our estimated change in net income, OCI, CSM and LICAT ratio for changes in market risk variables described above, based on market risk variables and business in force as at the reporting date. These sensitivities are calculated independently for each risk factor, generally assuming that all other risk variables stay constant. The sensitivities do not take into account indirect effects such as potential impacts on goodwill impairment or valuation allowances on deferred tax assets.
We have provided measures of our net income sensitivity to instantaneous changes in equity markets, interest rates, credit spreads, swap spreads, real estate price levels, and capital sensitivities to changes in equity price levels, interest rates and credit spreads. The LICAT ratio and CSM sensitivities are non-IFRS financial measures, and for additional information, see section M - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document. The cautionary language which appears in this section is applicable to all net income, CSM, OCI and LICAT ratio sensitivities.
Actual results can differ materially from these estimates for a variety of reasons, including differences in the pattern or distribution of the market shocks, the interaction between these risk factors, model error, or changes in other assumptions such as business mix, effective tax rates, policyholder behaviour, currency exchange rates and other market variables relative to those underlying the calculation of these sensitivities. The extent to which actual results may differ from the indicative ranges will generally increase with larger movements in risk variables. Our sensitivities as at December 31, 2023 have been included for comparative purposes only.
Sensitivities to interest rates and credit spreads assume a parallel shift in assumed interest rates across the entire yield curve or a parallel shift in the indicated spreads across the entire term structure, with no change to the ultimate risk-free rate or ultimate liquidity premium. Realized sensitivities may be significantly different from those illustrated based on factors such as different terms to maturity, geographies, asset classes and derivative types, and ratings.
The sensitivities reflect the composition of our assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. Changes in these positions due to new sales or maturities, asset purchases/sales, or other management actions could result in material changes to these reported sensitivities. In particular, these sensitivities reflect the expected impact of hedging activities based on the hedging programs in place as at the respective calculation dates. The actual impact of hedging activity can differ materially from that assumed in the estimated sensitivities due to ongoing hedge re-balancing activities, changes in the scale or scope of hedging activities, changes in the cost or general availability of hedging instruments, basis risk (i.e., the risk that hedges do not exactly replicate the underlying portfolio experience), model risk, and other operational risks in the ongoing management of the hedge programs or the potential failure of hedge counterparties to perform in accordance with expectations.
The sensitivities are based on methods and assumptions in effect as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, as applicable. Changes in the regulatory environment, assumptions or methods used to measure assets and liabilities after those dates could result in material changes to the estimated sensitivities. Changes in market risk variables in excess of the changes illustrated may result in other than proportionate impacts.
The sensitivities reflect the CSM as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. For insurance contracts measured using the VFA, where the change in the effect of the time value of money and financial risk not arising from the underlying items adjusts the CSM, changes in the CSM balance will affect the sensitivity of income to changes in market risk variables.
Our LICAT sensitivities may be non-linear and can change due to the interrelationship between market rates and spreads, actuarial assumptions and our LICAT calculations.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 65
For the reasons outlined above, our sensitivities should only be viewed as indicative estimates of the underlying sensitivities of each factor under these specialized assumptions, and should not be viewed as predictors of our future income, OCI, CSM or capital. Given the nature of these calculations, we cannot provide assurance that actual impacts will be consistent with the estimates provided.
Information related to market risk sensitivities should be read in conjunction with the information contained in section
N - Accounting and Control Matters - 1 - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in this document. Additional information on market risk can be found in Note 6 of the 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
ii. Insurance Risk
Risk Description
Insurance risk is the uncertainty of product performance due to actual experience emerging differently than expected in the areas of mortality, morbidity and longevity. In addition, policyholder behaviour, product design and pricing, expense and reinsurance risks impact multiple risk categories, including insurance risk.
Insurance Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of insurance risk management practices and controls, as outlined below:
•Insurance risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Risk Committee.
•Income and regulatory capital sensitivities are monitored, managed and reported against pre-established risk appetite limits for policyholder behaviour, mortality, morbidity and longevity risks.
•Comprehensive Insurance Risk Policy, guidelines and practices are in place.
•The global underwriting manual aligns underwriting practices with our corporate risk management standards and ensures a consistent approach in insurance underwriting.
•Board-approved maximum retention limits are in place. Amounts issued in excess of these limits are reinsured.
•Detailed procedures, including criteria for approval of risks and for claims adjudication are established and monitored for each business segment.
•Underwriting and risk selection standards and procedures are established and overseen by the corporate underwriting and claims risk management function.
•Diversification and risk pooling is managed by aggregation of exposures across product lines, geography and distribution channels.
•Reinsurance is used to limit losses, minimize exposure to significant risks and to provide additional capacity for growth.
•The Insurance Risk Policy and Investment & Credit Risk Policy establish acceptance criteria and protocols to monitor the level of reinsurance ceded to any single reinsurer or group of reinsurers.
•Reinsurance counterparty risk is monitored, including annual reporting of reinsurance exposure to the Risk Committee.
•Various limits, restrictions and fee structures are introduced into plan designs in order to establish a more homogeneous policy risk profile and limit potential for anti-selection.
•Regulatory solvency requirements include risk-based capital requirements and are monitored regularly.
•The Product Design and Pricing Policy requires detailed risk assessment and pricing provision for material risks.
•Company specific and industry level experience studies and drivers of earnings analysis are monitored and factored into valuation, renewal and new business pricing processes.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse movements in insurance risk factors.
•Insurance contract liabilities are established in accordance with IFRS.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels.
The concentration for insurance risks is monitored geographically and its adverse effect is mitigated through a diversified product portfolio, product design, underwriting standards and practices, utilizing reinsurance as well as the Company's global operation. Specific to the reinsurance risk, the concentration is measured by aggregating the exposure to each reinsurance counterparty across all Business Groups to ensure it does not exceed a predefined risk level.
Specific insurance risks and our risk management strategies are discussed below in further detail.
Policyholder Behaviour Risk
Many of our products include some form of embedded policyholder option. We can incur losses due to adverse policyholder behaviour relative to the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products regarding lapse of policies or exercise of other embedded policy options.
Uncertainty in policyholder behaviour can arise from several sources including:
•Unexpected events in the policyholder's life circumstances;
•The general level of economic activity (whether higher or lower than expected);
•Changes in the financial and capital markets;
•Changes in pricing and availability of current products;
•The introduction of new products, changes in underwriting technology and standards;
•Changes in our financial strength or reputation.
Uncertainty in future cash flows affected by policyholder behaviour can be further exacerbated by unexpected behaviour during times of economic turbulence or at key option exercise points in the life of an insurance contract.
66 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Various types of provisions are built into many of our products to reduce the impact of uncertain policyholder behaviour. These provisions include:
•Surrender charges that adjust the payout to the policyholder by taking into account prevailing market conditions.
•Limits on the amount that policyholders can surrender or borrow.
•Restrictions on the timing of policyholders' ability to exercise certain options.
•Restrictions on both the types of funds policyholders can select and the frequency with which they can change funds.
Policyholder behaviour risk is also mitigated through reinsurance on some insurance contracts.
Internal experience studies are used to monitor, review and update policyholder behaviour assumptions as needed, which could result in updates to policy liabilities.
Mortality and Morbidity Risk
Mortality and morbidity risk is the risk that future experience could be unfavourable relative to the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products.
Mortality and morbidity risk could adversely affect many of our products which introduces the potential for adverse financial results. These risks can arise in the normal course of business through random fluctuation in realized experience, through catastrophes, as a result of a pandemic, or in association with other risk factors such as product development and pricing risk. Adverse mortality and morbidity experience could also occur through systemic anti-selection, which could arise due to poor plan design, or underwriting process failure or the development of investor-owned and secondary markets for life insurance policies. Adverse morbidity experience could also occur through external events such as increases in disability claims during economic slowdowns, increases in high medical treatment costs and growth in utilization of specialty drugs.
Mortality and morbidity concentration risk is the risk of a catastrophic event that could occur in geographic locations where there is significant insurance coverage, such as natural environmental disasters (for example, earthquakes), human-made disasters (for example, acts of terrorism, military actions, and inadvertent introduction of toxic elements into the environment) as well as epidemics.
Concentration risk exposure is monitored on group policies in a single location. We do not have a high degree of concentration risk to single individuals or groups due to our well-diversified geographic and business mix. The largest portion of mortality risk within the Company is in North America. Individual and group insurance policies are underwritten prior to initial issue and renewals, based on risk selection, plan design, and rating techniques.
Current legislation in Canada restricts insurers from requiring policyholders to take or release the results of genetic tests. If policyholders have access to the results of genetic tests and we do not, this creates asymmetry of information between policyholders and insurers, which could adversely impact mortality and morbidity experience and policyholder behaviour. This asymmetry of information may increase as genetic testing advances and becomes more accessible, giving rise to better diagnoses of conditions where treatments are expensive or non-existent. The asymmetry of information may lead to increased anti-selection in new business underwriting. There may also be an impact on policy lapse rates where adverse genetic testing results may motivate policyholders to retain their policies resulting in higher claims payouts than assumed in the pricing and valuation of products, as well as increased insurance rates which may result in loss of new and existing policyholders.
Detailed uniform underwriting procedures have been established to determine the insurability of applicants and to manage exposure to large claims. These underwriting requirements are regularly scrutinized against industry guidelines and oversight is provided through a corporate underwriting and claim management function. We are committed to paying claims fairly and promptly in accordance with the terms of our policies. Our claims management process is designed to ensure thorough evaluation of claims.
The Insurance Risk Policy, which is approved by the Risk Committee, sets out limits on the maximum amount of insurance risk per life that may be retained. Retention limits per life vary by geographic region and amounts in excess of the Board-approved maximum retention limits are reinsured to ensure there is no exposure to unreasonable concentration of risk.
•On a single life or joint-first-to-die basis our retention limit is $40 million in Canada and US$40 million outside of Canada.
•For survivorship life insurance, our maximum global retention limit is $50 million in Canada and US$50 million outside of Canada.
•In certain markets and jurisdictions, retention levels below the maximum are applied.
Reinsurance is utilized for numerous products in most business segments, and placement is done on an automatic basis for defined insurance portfolios and on a facultative basis for individual risks with certain characteristics.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 67
Longevity Risk
Longevity risk is the potential for losses arising from adverse changes in mortality improvement rates relative to the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products. This risk can manifest itself slowly over time as socioeconomic conditions improve and medical advances continue. It could also manifest itself more quickly, for example, due to medical breakthroughs that significantly extend life expectancy.
Longevity risk affects contracts where benefits or costs are based upon the likelihood of survival and higher than expected improvements in insured life expectancy could therefore increase the ultimate cost of these benefits (for example, annuities, pensions, pure endowments, some segregated funds, and specific types of health contracts), thereby requiring strengthening of policyholder liabilities and resulting in reductions in net income and capital.
To improve management of longevity risk, we monitor research in the fields that could result in a change in expected mortality improvement. Stress-testing techniques are used to measure and monitor the impact of extreme mortality improvement on the aggregate portfolio of protection and wealth products.
Product Design and Pricing Risk
Product design and pricing risk is the risk a product does not perform as expected, causing adverse financial consequences. This risk may arise from deviations in realized experience versus assumptions used in the pricing of products. Risk factors include uncertainty concerning:
•Future investment yields
•Policyholder behaviour
•Mortality and morbidity experience
•Sales levels
•Mix of business
•Expenses
•Taxes
Although some of our products permit us to increase premiums or adjust other charges and credits during the life of the policy or contract, the terms of these policies or contracts may not allow for sufficient adjustments to maintain expected profitability. This could have an adverse effect on our profitability and capital position.
Products that offer complex features, options or guarantees require increasingly complex pricing models, methods or assumptions, leading to additional levels of uncertainty.
•The risk of mis-pricing increases with the number and inherent uncertainty of assumptions needed to model a product.
•Past experience data supplemented with future trend assumptions may be poor predictors of future experience.
•Lack of experience data on new products or new Client segments increases the risk that future actual experience unfolds differently from expected assumptions.
•External environmental factors may introduce new risk factors, which were unanticipated during product design, and have an adverse result on the financial performance of the product.
•Policyholder behaviour in the future may vary from that assumed at the time the product is designed, thereby adversely affecting the product's financial performance.
Our Product Design and Pricing Policy, approved by the Risk Committee, establishes the framework governing our product design and pricing practices and is designed to align our product offerings with our strategic objectives and risk-taking philosophy. Consistent with this policy, product development, design and pricing processes have been implemented throughout the Company. New products follow a stage-gate process with defined management approvals based on the significance of the initiative. Each initiative is subject to a risk assessment process to identify key risks and risk mitigation requirements and is reviewed by multiple stakeholders. Additional governance and control procedures are listed below:
•Pricing models, methods, and assumptions are subject to periodic internal peer reviews.
•Experience studies, drivers of earnings analysis, and product dashboards are used to monitor actual experience against those assumed in pricing and valuation.
•On experience rated, participating, and adjustable products, emerging experience is reflected through changes in policyholder dividend scales as well as other policy adjustment mechanisms such as premium and benefit levels.
•Limits and restrictions may be introduced into the design of products to mitigate adverse policyholder behaviour or apply upper thresholds on certain benefits.
Expense Risk
Expense risk is the risk that future expenses are higher than the assumptions used in the pricing and valuation of products. This risk can arise from:
•General economic conditions;
•Unexpected increases in inflation;
•Slower than anticipated growth;
•Changes in availability of current products; or
•Reduction in productivity leading to increases in unit expenses.
Expense risk occurs in products where we cannot or will not pass increased costs onto the policyholder and will manifest itself in the form of a liability increase or a reduction in expected future profits.
From time to time, certain products or business segments may be closed for new sales (for example, individual protection business in the U.S.). Our ability to effectively manage the run-off of business in these products or business segments introduces additional risks, such as policyholder behaviour and expense risk, that may have an adverse effect on our operations, profitability and financial position.
We closely monitor expenses through an annual budgeting process and ongoing monitoring of any expense gaps between unit expenses assumed in pricing and actual expenses.
68 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Reinsurance Risk
We purchase reinsurance for certain risks underwritten by our various insurance businesses. Reinsurance risk is the risk of financial loss due to adverse developments in reinsurance markets (for example, discontinuance or diminution of reinsurance capacity, or an increase in the cost of reinsurance), insolvency of a reinsurer or inadequate reinsurance coverage. While reinsurance arrangements provide for the recovery of claims arising from the liabilities ceded, we retain primary responsibility to the policyholders.
Rates for our in-force reinsurance treaties can be either guaranteed or adjustable for the life of the ceded policy. Changes in reinsurance market conditions, including actions taken by reinsurers to increase rates on existing and new coverage and our ability to obtain appropriate reinsurance, may adversely impact the availability or cost of maintaining existing or securing new reinsurance capacity, with adverse impacts on our business strategies, profitability and financial position. There is a possibility of rate increases or renegotiation of some of the legacy reinsurance contracts by our reinsurers, as the global reinsurance industry continues to review and optimize their business models. In addition, changes to the regulatory treatment of reinsurance arrangements could have an adverse impact on our capital position.
We have an Insurance Risk Policy approved by the Risk Committee and an Investment & Credit Risk Policy approved by the Governance Committee, which set acceptance criteria and processes to monitor and manage the level of reinsurance ceded to any single reinsurer. These policies are regularly reviewed and approved by the relevant Board Committee to ensure the alignment with our risk appetite levels and reinsurance risk guidelines.
The policies set the acceptance criteria which verify if a reinsurer qualifies as a suitable reinsurance counterparty, having the capability, expertise, governance practices and financial capacity to assume the risks being considered. In addition, a periodic due diligence is performed on the existing reinsurance counterparties, including an internal credit assessment for reinsurance counterparties with whom we have material exposure.
The exposure to each reinsurance counterparty is monitored closely to ensure that no single reinsurance counterparty represents an undue level of credit risk and does not exceed the predefined limits. In order to diversify our reinsurance risk, there is generally more than one reinsurance counterparty supporting a reinsurance pool. A summary of the reinsurance counterparty credit risk exposures is reported annually to the Risk Committee.
To further increase the reinsurance risk control, our reinsurance agreements include provisions to allow actions to be taken, such as recapture of ceded risk (at a potential cost to the Company), in the event that the reinsurance counterparty loses its legal ability to carry on business through insolvency or regulatory action.
In case of unfavourable developments in the reinsurance markets, we also have an option to discontinue or implement changes to the new sales of our products to better manage the associated risks.
Additional information on insurance risk can be found in Note 7 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
iii. Credit Risk
Risk Description
Credit risk is the possibility of loss from amounts owed by our borrowers or financial counterparties. We are subject to credit risk in connection with issuers of securities held in our investment portfolio, debtors, structured securities, reinsurers, counterparties (including derivative, repurchase agreement and securities lending counterparties), other financial institutions and other entities. Losses may occur when a counterparty fails to make timely payments pursuant to the terms of the underlying contractual arrangement or when the counterparty's credit rating or risk profile otherwise deteriorates. Credit risk can also arise in connection with deterioration in the value of, or ability to realize, any underlying security that may be used as collateral for the debt obligation. Credit risk can occur as a result of broad economic conditions, challenges within specific sectors of the economy, from issues affecting individual companies or loss given default expectations. Events that result in defaults, impairments or downgrades of the securities in our investment portfolio would cause the Company to record realized or unrealized losses and may cause an increase in our provisions for asset default, adversely impacting earnings.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 69
Credit Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of credit risk management practices and controls, as outlined below:
•Credit risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Risk Committee.
•Risk appetite limits have been established for credit risk.
•Income and regulatory capital sensitivities are monitored, managed and reported against pre-established risk limits.
•Comprehensive Investment and Credit Risk Management Policy, guidelines and practices are in place.
•Specific investment diversification requirements are in place, such as defined investment limits for asset class, geography, and industry.
•Risk-based credit portfolio, counterparty, and sector exposure limits have been established.
•Mandatory use of credit quality ratings for portfolio investments has been established and is reviewed regularly. These internal rating decisions for new fixed income investments and ongoing review of existing rating decisions are independently adjudicated by Corporate Risk Management.
• Develop and maintain hedging programs that may employ the use of derivatives. Market conditions determine the availability and cost of the derivative protection.
•Comprehensive due diligence processes and ongoing credit analyses are conducted.
•Regulatory solvency requirements include risk-based capital requirements and are monitored regularly.
•Comprehensive compliance monitoring practices and procedures including reporting against pre-established investment limits are in place.
•Purchase reinsurance for certain risks underwritten by our various insurance businesses. Reinsurance does not relieve us from our direct liability to policyholders and accordingly, we bear credit risk with respect to our reinsurers. Reinsurance exposures are monitored to ensure that no single reinsurer represents an undue level of credit risk.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse credit developments.
•Insurance contract liabilities are established in accordance with IFRS.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
Our core principles of credit risk management include asset diversification, fundamental research and analysis of cash flows, proactive and continuous risk monitoring, active management and relative value assessment, all with the objective of optimizing risk-adjusted returns, with due consideration for the impacts of capital and taxation.
We rate fixed income investments primarily through the use of internally developed scorecards and rating methodologies, which combine an estimated probability of default and loss given default to determine an expected loss and credit risk rating. This rating is expressed using a 22-point scale that is generally consistent with those used by external rating agencies, and is based on detailed examination of the borrower's, or issuer's, credit quality and the characteristics of the specific instrument. The probability of default assessment is based on borrower-level or issuer-level analysis, which encompasses an assessment of industry risk, business strategy, competitiveness, strength of management and other financial information. The loss given default assessment is based on instrument-level analysis, which considers the impact of guarantees, covenants, liquidity and other structural features. These scorecards provide input to stochastic value-at-risk models and are used to stress test the portfolio, which provide insight into the distribution and characteristics of credit risk within our portfolios. In accordance with our policies and under normal circumstances, our ratings cannot be higher than the highest rating provided by certain Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations ("NRSROs"). Certain assets, including those in our sovereign debt, are assigned a rating based on ratings provided by NRSROs using a priority sequence order of Standard & Poor's, Moody's, Fitch and DBRS Limited.
Additional information on credit risk can be found in Note 6 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
iv. Business and Strategic Risk
Risk Description
Business and strategic risk is the risk of loss from the inability to adequately identify, plan or implement an appropriate strategy to achieve strategic and business objectives or adapt to changes in Client behaviour, the external business, economic, geopolitical, regulatory or environmental and social landscape or when assumptions made in strategy are not realized as expected.
Business and Strategic Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of business and strategic risk management practices and controls, as outlined below:
•Business and strategic risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring, review and reporting to Senior Management, the Board and the Board Committees.
•Business and strategic risk is managed through our strategic and business planning process and controls over the implementation of these plans. These plans are reviewed and key themes, issues and emerging risks are discussed by our Executive Team and by the Board and/or Board Committees.
•Our Business and Strategic Plans are subject to approval by the Board, which also receives regular reviews of implementation progress against key Business Plan objectives.
•Comprehensive policies including the Risk Framework, Risk Appetite Policy, Product Design and Pricing Policy, Mergers and Acquisition Policy, Change Management Risk - Strategic Execution Policy, Capital and Liquidity Management Framework and Capital Risk Policy are in place.
•Our corporate strategy and business objectives are established within the boundaries set out in the Risk Framework and the Risk Appetite Policy. Our business strategies and plans are designed to align with our risk appetite, our capital position and our financial performance objectives.
•Our risk appetite is periodically assessed, taking into consideration the economic and regulatory environments in which we operate.
•Merger, acquisition, strategic investments and divestiture transactions are governed by a Board-approved Merger and Acquisition Risk Management Policy and significant transactions require the approval of the Board.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse scenarios.
70 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
•Key and emerging risks are identified, monitored and reported, including emerging regulatory changes that may have a material impact on our finances, operations or reputation.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets. In the event of capital breaches, a clearly defined escalation process is in place.
We regularly review and adapt our business strategies and plans to take account of changes in the external business, economic, geopolitical and regulatory environments in which we operate. Our business strategies and plans are designed to align with our risk appetite, our capital position and our financial performance objectives. We periodically reassess our risk appetite taking into consideration the economic, regulatory and competitive environment in which we operate.
Specific business and strategic risks are discussed below in further detail.
Geopolitical Risk
Geopolitical risk is the wide array of risks associated with conflict or tensions between states as well as events or trends with global or international dimensions that increase risks for the operations of companies. We operate in various geographies and our business and financial operations are susceptible to regional and global economic, geopolitical and regulatory changes. Geopolitical risk may lead to increased volatility in the global capital and energy markets, difficulty in conducting business in certain geographies, an increased threat of targeted cyber-attacks, and has the potential to introduce reputational risk. The most recent actions between the US and Canada and the possibility of a drawn out trade war with tariffs in place for an extended period of time may cause severe disruption to the Canadian and US economies, impacting markets, GDP growth, foreign exchange rates, inflation and employment with associated implications for Clients and investments.
Economic Risk
We may be affected by economic and capital markets conditions and economic shocks around the globe as a result of increasingly connected global markets. Factors such as changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, market volatility, housing prices, consumer spending, saving and debt, business investment and inflation around the globe can affect the business and economic environments in which we operate.
Economic risk can also intersect with other risk considerations such as environmental and social risks. The impact of these factors include the possibility of continued low growth, sustained low interest rates, increases in inflation, increased volatility in interest rates and equity markets, and a continuation of relatively low yet volatile credit spreads. The impact on the economic environment from any of these events may not be consistent with our assumptions and expectations, which may adversely impact our financial results and the ability to implement our business strategy. Market-related impacts from the economic environment, legal, regulatory or policy changes or other governmental actions could continue to place pressure on our earnings, regulatory capital requirements, profitability, liquidity and our ability to implement our business strategies and plans. Low interest rates and increased volatility create a number of challenges for us including increased hedge costs, lower investment yields, adverse policyholder behaviour and lower levels of new business profitability. Other impacts of macro-economic uncertainty and volatility may lead to other financial and non-financial impacts including goodwill impairment, decline in our share price and impact on our credit and financial strength ratings.
Execution Risk
Our business strategies, plans and financial performance are dependent on the successful execution of organizational and strategic initiatives designed to support the growth of our business. Our ability to effectively manage and prioritize the execution of these initiatives, identify and adapt rapidly to new opportunities, and refine our strategies in response to changing economic, regulatory and competitive environment directly affects our ability to execute our strategies. Identifying and implementing the right set of initiatives is critical to achieving our Business Plan targets.
Successful execution of our business strategies and plans impacts a number of factors, including:
•Our ability to generate sufficient earnings to maintain an adequate level of capital;
•Our ability to generate sustained investment performance;
•Our ability to meet regulatory requirements;
•Our ability to manage our risk exposures effectively;
•Our ability to attract and retain Clients and distributors;
•Our ability to have the right set of diverse products and business mix, and
•Our ability to reduce operating expenses while maintaining our ability to hire, retain and motivate key personnel.
There is no certainty that we will be successful in implementing our business strategies or that these strategies will achieve our objectives. If our business strategies are not successful or are not executed effectively, it could lead to cost structure challenges and we may not be able to achieve our growth objectives or react to market opportunities, which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.
Distribution Risk
We distribute our products through a variety of distribution channels, including direct sales agents, managing general agents, independent general agents, financial intermediaries, broker-dealers, banks, pension and benefits consultants and other third-party marketing organizations. Competition for these intermediaries and agents is based on products, compensation, support services and financial position.
We face the risk that our key distribution partners may undergo consolidation, change in ownership structure or change their distribution model which could materially impact sales and our growth targets. New distribution channels could emerge that may impact the effectiveness of our current distribution strategy. Distribution channels are growing rapidly in some businesses in certain countries, which may heighten the risks of market conduct and channel conflicts or overlaps. Distribution risk may also be influenced where our distribution or product strategy and related services or technology are not in line with our strategic objectives or in consideration of the changes in Client behaviour or our regulatory environment.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 71
The capability to reach and retain Clients through use of digital technology and data analytics is becoming increasingly important in the insurance industry. While use of digital-based distribution channels may help us achieve or expand scale, these channels expose us to regulatory compliance and information security related risks.
Failure to achieve planned distribution scale could materially impact our financial and strategic objectives. This includes the inability to attract and retain intermediaries and agents at a cost that is financially feasible to the Company, or to develop online sales and Client support capabilities and technologies. In addition, the lack of a well-diversified distribution model in the jurisdictions in which we do business may cause over-reliance on agency channel or key partners.
Risks Relating to Mergers, Acquisitions, Divestitures and Strategic Investments
We regularly explore opportunities to selectively acquire other businesses or to divest ourselves of all or part of certain businesses, in support of our growth and strategic objectives.
Any transaction carries risks associated with economic, operational, strategic, financial, tax, legal, regulatory, compliance, environmental, social, and other factors, which could adversely impact our ability to achieve our financial and strategic objectives. These may include the risks that:
•We may be unable to make an appropriate acquisition in a desired market or business line;
•We may be unable to realize the financial and strategic benefits of the transactions, including any anticipated cost savings following an acquisition, due to competitive factors, regulatory requirements or other reasons;
•The capital utilized to finance any transaction may limit our ability to deploy further capital to pursue other opportunities and initiatives;
•We may fail to, or are unable to, uncover all material liabilities and/or subsequent asset impairments, despite having conducted extensive due diligence, and;
•The customary indemnifications provided by the seller to the purchaser may not be collectible or sufficient to fully offset losses arising from the acquired business, and the credit risk of the seller that the purchaser may be exposed to if an indemnification provision is triggered.
Our ability to realize the contemplated economic, financial, and strategic benefit of any transaction is contingent on several factors, including:
•The effective separation and/or integration of the transferred businesses, restructure and/or reorganization of related businesses, and retention of key personnel to effectively execute these transactions, and;
•The successful integration of the acquired businesses with our existing operation, and harmonization of any differences in organizational culture, which may require the dedication of significant management resources and distract management’s attention from our day-to-day business.
To mitigate these risks, we have established procedures to govern the evaluation, execution and integration of mergers and acquisitions transactions. Regular updates on execution and integration risks relating to these transactions are provided to the Board, its Committees and senior management teams, as appropriate, along with any mitigants developed to address such risks.
Competitive Environment
Competition from insurance companies, banks, asset managers, mutual fund companies, financial planners and other service providers (including new entrants and non-traditional financial services companies) is intense, and could adversely affect our business in certain countries.
The trend towards global consolidation of the financial services industry has resulted in competitors with significant market share and established distribution relationships and brands. These larger companies have the ability to heavily invest in fundamental activities for sustained profitable growth and superior Client service such as brand equity, product development, technology, risk management, and distribution capability.
The businesses in which we engage are highly competitive and our ability to sell our products is dependent on many factors, including scale, price and yields offered, distribution channels, digital capabilities, financial strength ratings, range of product lines and product and service quality, brand strength, investment performance, historical dividend levels and the ability to provide value added services to distributors and Clients. In certain markets, some of our competitors may be superior to us on one or more of these factors. Our competitors have significant potential to disrupt our business through targeted strategies to reduce our market share which may include targeting our key people or bancassurance partners and other distributors or aggressively pricing their products. Our ability to achieve our Business Plans and strategies depends significantly upon our capacity to anticipate and respond quickly to these competitive pressures.
Technology is driving rapid change in the financial services sector and is enabling new entrants to compete or offer services to our competitors to enhance their ability to compete in certain segments of the insurance, wealth and asset management markets. The emergence of new technologies such as robotic process automation, artificial intelligence, blockchain and advanced analytics may have an impact on the financial services sector and how companies interact with their stakeholders. Our current competitors or new entrants may use these or other new technologies to provide services in various areas such as customized pricing, proactive outreach to Clients and targeted marketing in order to strengthen their Client relationships and influence Client behaviour. The risk of disruption from changing technology and innovation may impact our distribution models as new and low cost digital-based business models emerge in connection with the distribution of financial services and products, such as insurtechs and robo-advisors. These risks are evolving rapidly with an increasing number of digital users and are difficult to anticipate and respond to proactively, and may adversely impact our profitability and financial position.
Competitors may offer a greater selection of or lower cost products, which may require us to adapt at a more rapid pace, create margin pressure in some of our businesses and impact our profitability and market share. In the asset management sector, there has been a trend among investors towards lower-fee passive investment products such as index- and other types of exchange-traded funds, which may impact our ability to attract and retain Clients in our actively managed products. Product development and product life cycles have shortened in many product segments, leading to more intense competition with respect to product features. This increases product development and administrative costs and reduces the time frame over which capital expenditures can be recovered. Regulatory and compliance costs also generally rise with increases in the range and complexity of our product portfolio.
72 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Many of our insurance products, particularly those offered by the group segment, are renewed annually. Given this relatively high frequency of renewal activity, this business may be particularly exposed to adverse persistency through competitive market pressures.
Different accounting bases of reporting and regulatory capital requirements across multiple jurisdictions may cause us to be at a disadvantage compared to some of our competitors due to differences in reported earnings and due to these reporting and regulatory capital requirements.
Investment Performance
Investment performance risk is the possibility that we fail to achieve the desired return objectives on our investment portfolio, or that our asset management businesses fail to design or execute investment strategies in order to achieve competitive returns on the products and managed accounts offered by these businesses. Failure to achieve investment objectives may adversely affect our revenue and profitability through slower growth prospects and adverse impacts on policyholder or Client behaviour.
For our insurance businesses, the performance of our investment portfolio depends in part upon the level of and changes in interest rates, spreads, credit experience, equity prices, real estate values, the performance of the economy in general, the performance of the specific obligors included in these portfolios and other factors that are beyond our control. These changes can affect our net investment income substantially in any period.
In our asset management businesses, portfolio management risk is the risk that an investment strategy is not executed in a prudent manner, such that the mandate significantly fails to fulfill its investment objective and materially falls short of its target returns and relevant benchmark rates of return.
•Not properly executing the investment strategy could cause potential legal or regulatory concern and reputational harm, and we could lose existing and potential Clients.
•We may also see adversely affected sales, increased outflows or reduced level of assets under management, which could lead to a decline in the fee margin and financial losses.
Changes in Legal and Regulatory Environment
Most of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation and supervision. Changes to legislation, regulations or government policies, or the manner in which they are interpreted or enforced, may require that we make significant changes to our strategy and may result in increased implementation costs and diversion of resources to manage the change. These changes could impact financial reporting, accounting processes, capital requirements, the regulatory framework for our products and services, the regulation of selling practices, sales intermediaries and product offerings, solvency requirements, executive compensation, and corporate governance practices and could impose restrictions on our foreign operations (such as limits on foreign ownership of local companies). All of these changes could have an adverse effect on our business and operations. Our failure to comply with existing and evolving regulatory requirements could also result in regulatory sanctions and could affect our relationships with regulatory authorities and our ability to execute our business strategies and plans.
Currently there are a number of regulatory developments in Canada and globally which could impact our business and the way we are regulated or supervised in various jurisdictions, which include the following:
•In Canada, there has been increased focus on enhancing the affordability of and accessibility to prescription drugs and dental procedures, including pressure on the federal government from political parties, some provincial governments, the media and advocacy groups to implement forms of nationalized pharmacare and dentalcare programs. These programs could impact our business in several ways, including premium income, our ability to offer coverage, the price and level of coverage of other benefits we offer or are able to offer through our Canadian group benefits business, which in turn could impact plan renewals and retention of group Clients, plan member interaction and the value of other coverage offered by that business.
•Insurance and securities regulators continue to focus on client fairness, advisor conduct and related practices and are assessing product fees, compensation practices, sales practices and conflicts of interest. Regulators are also imposing higher standards that relate to interacting with clients in order to increase disclosure obligations related to fees; impose prohibitions or restrictions on the payment of certain types of commissions and service fees to agents, advisors and third-party distributors; resulting in changes to product features and sales and market practices by agents, advisors, product manufacturers and distributors. Examples of these changes include the Client Focused Reforms released by the Canadian Securities Administrators which fully came into effect on December 31, 2021, and the final rule amendments published by the Canadian Securities Administrators and the Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators in April 2023, and coming into effect on January 1, 2026 to enhance total cost reporting for investment funds and segregated funds.
•In the U.S., the Trump administration is expected to reshape federal policy through executive and regulatory authority. These policy changes may affect taxation, healthcare, technology, trade, and ESG, among other things, and could directly or indirectly impact our business.
•In June 2020, China passed the Hong Kong National Security Law under which law enforcement authorities have extensive powers. In July 2020, then-U.S. President Trump signed into law the Hong Kong Autonomy Act (the "Act"), and issued an Executive Order providing authority to impose primary sanctions against entities and individuals determined to have materially contributed to the undermining of Hong Kong’s autonomy. The Act also provides authority to impose secondary sanctions against non-U.S. financial institutions determined to have conducted a significant transaction for any individual or entity subject to primary sanctions under the Act. In June 2021, China enacted the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Countering Foreign Sanctions, which authorizes the State Council to impose countermeasures in response to sanctions imposed by foreign governments on Chinese companies and individuals. In March 2024, Hong Kong enacted the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance pursuant to Article 23 of the Basic Law of Hong Kong, which comprises a number of new offences (including those relating to state secrets), changes to existing offences and additional powers on enforcement and implementation by law enforcement authorities including extraterritorially. The U.S. and China have applied a number of targeted sanctions and trade restrictions against the other's respective interests in recent years and there may be heightened risks and uncertainties to our business in Hong Kong as a result of these developments.
•Regulators are increasing their focus on data, technology and cybersecurity. New laws, regulations, guidelines, directives and expectations continue to emerge that will require the Company to enhance its technology and information security programs, upgrade its third-party risk management and data governance programs, increase regulatory reporting obligations and have an impact on the costs and resources associated with the Company’s data technology and information security activities.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 73
•Regulators in the various jurisdictions in which we operate have increased their focus on ESG matters, including the impact of climate change, and some regulators have taken steps towards introducing or have already introduced rules to address risks and disclosures around these matters. In Canada, OSFI Guideline B-15 on Climate Risk Management ("Guideline B-15") became effective as of fiscal year-end 2024 and sets out OSFI’s expectations related to the management and disclosure of climate-related risks by FRFIs. In December 2024, the Canadian Sustainability Standards Board (CSSB) finalized and issued its Canadian Sustainability Disclosures Standards (“CSDS”) 1 and 2. CSDS 1 and CSDS 2 are standards for general sustainability-related disclosures and climate-related disclosures, respectively. While the proposed standards will not be mandatory, their release is expected to lead to the implementation by regulators of mandatory sustainability reporting requirements under applicable Canadian law. OSFI has committed to ensuring interoperability from a prudential perspective between Guideline B-15 and the CSSB standards. The Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) intends to consider the final CSSB standards in its revised proposal for a climate-related disclosure regime and may include modifications appropriate for Canadian capital markets. In addition, in 2022, the CSA published guidance for investment funds relating to ESG disclosure, which was revised in March 2024. In the U.S., state governments and regulators have increased their focus on the ESG practices of financial institutions, asset managers, and large U.S. entities conducting business in their states, particularly with respect to climate risk and greenhouse gas emissions. This includes both the climate-related disclosure legislation in states such as California as well as, conflicting state level considerations on other ESG practices that reflect the political polarization surrounding ESG in the U.S. Additionally, the SEC issued its final climate related disclosure rule which requires many registrants to include certain climate-related disclosures in their regulatory filings. The rule is on hold pending judicial review. In addition, the broad-reaching EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive came into effect in 2023, which mandates comprehensive reporting under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards from many non-EU headquartered companies with EU operations that meet certain criteria. Potential divergence in expectations among regulators, as well as the pace of regulatory change in the area of climate change, could lead to operational risks. We continue to monitor our risk management practices and disclosures as new regulations and standards are implemented and as the situation continues to evolve. We are also monitoring the development of anti-greenwashing laws and regulations, including recent amendments to the Competition Act (Canada) which have introduced new substantiation standards for environmental claims, as well as climate-related litigation and enforcement actions relating to “greenwashing” or the practice of making misleading or unsubstantiated environmental claims.
See the heading Regulatory Matters in the AIF for a description of our regulatory environment in Canada, the U.S., Asia and Bermuda and other examples of changes in regulation that may affect our business and operations.
Environmental and Social Risk
Our financial performance, operations, and reputation may be adversely affected if we do not adequately prepare for the direct or indirect impacts of environmental and social risks. Environmental and social risks include but are not limited to environmental damage on properties owned or managed by us, physical risks, as well as public health risks. These risks may impact our direct operations, investing activities or other areas of our value chain.
Environmental and social risks can arise as a direct result of the increased frequency and severity of environmental disasters, emerging regulatory and public policy developments, and their impacts on our operations, invested assets, suppliers, Clients and reputation. They can also arise indirectly through heightened stakeholder expectations around environmental and social performance, resource constraints, costs associated with adaptation, and Clients and suppliers negatively impacted by the aforementioned. Environmental and social risks are considered in our risk assessment processes.
As an owner/lessor of and investor in real estate, we may be impacted where environmental events damage or disrupt our underlying properties. Our businesses and the properties underlying our investments are subject to environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Consequently, we may experience environmental impacts or liabilities that could adversely affect the value of those businesses and properties, their ability to generate income, and costs related to any compliance requirements or remediation. Through other invested assets, such as loans, bonds or equity investments, we could be subject to these impacts and negative consequences from environmental issues arising at the level of the issuer and/or specific asset. Our reputation and operations may be adversely affected if we or our tenants, borrowers, or other associated parties violate environmental regulations or best practices.
Environmental risks could also harm the financial position of our reinsurers and insurers of property which we own, lease, have invested in, or manage. In turn, this may increase the risk of default on recoveries from these reinsurers and insurers, may increase the cost of reinsuring our business or the cost of insurance, and may result in reinsurance or insurance coverage being unavailable.
Significant environmental changes and disasters may also reduce the overall level of economic activity in affected areas which could hurt our businesses, the value of our investments, our ability to offer products and services, or service our existing Clients. As noted above under Insurance Risk - Mortality and Morbidity Risk, environmental risks have implications in areas such as catastrophic risk and the concentration risk presented by natural and human-made environmental disasters. As these events increase, they may impact our mortality and morbidity experience and our pricing and modelling assumptions.
If our Clients, shareholder groups, or other key stakeholders deem that our environmental and social practices are inadequate, our business could be negatively affected. Failure to comply with an existing or potential Client's policies (or not meeting their minimum requirements) could disqualify us from the opportunity to bid on, earn, or retain business. We may also experience reduced access to capital markets if certain indices find that our practices fall short of their criteria and we are removed as an index constituent.
v. Operational Risk
Risk Description
Operational risk is the risk of loss (financial and non-financial) resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Operational risk is present in all of our business activities and encompasses a broad range of risks as described below. Operational risk is embedded in the practices utilized to manage other risks and, therefore, if not managed effectively, operational risk can impact our ability to manage other key risks.
74 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Operational Risk Management Governance and Control
We employ a wide range of operational risk management practices and controls, as outlined below:
•Operational risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Board Committees.
•Risk appetite limits have been established in Operational Risk.
•Comprehensive Operational Risk Management Framework, Policies, guidelines and practices are in place.
•Our governance practices, corporate values, Code of Conduct and Company-wide approach to managing risk set the foundation for mitigating operational risks.
•Our Code of Conduct sets the tone for a strong ethical culture, and we regularly review and update the Code of Conduct to ensure that it continues to meet the expectations of regulators and other stakeholders. All our directors and employees must reconfirm annually their understanding of and commitment to comply with the Code of Conduct.
•We have established appropriate internal controls and systems for talent acquisition, rewards and development programs that attract, build and retain top talent and create strong succession plans as well as compensation programs, and we provide ongoing training to our people.
•We conduct regular monitoring of employee engagement to ensure we create and maintain a work environment where all employees are welcome and able to contribute effectively.
•Stress-testing techniques, such as FCT, are used to measure the effects of large and sustained adverse scenarios.
•We mitigate a portion of our operational risk exposure through our corporate insurance program by purchasing insurance coverage that seeks to provide insurance against unexpected material losses resulting from events such as criminal activity, property loss or damage and liability exposures, or that satisfies legal requirements and contractual obligations.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
Specific operational risks and our risk management strategies are discussed below in further detail.
Information Security and Privacy Risks
Information and technology are used in almost all aspects of our business and operations. As part of our Client strategy, we continue to enhance the digital side of our business to support and enable new business models and processes, that are more personal, proactive and predictive.
Our business and the successful implementation of our digital strategy are dependent on various factors including maintaining a secure environment for information belonging to our Clients, employees and other parties that interact with us. This requires the effective and secure use, management and oversight of information and physical assets. We engage with various stakeholders and leverage emerging technologies, including digital, mobile applications, cloud computing, artificial intelligence and robotic process automation. These technologies are used to collect, process and maintain information relating to business transactions and financial reporting, as well as the personal information of our Clients and employees. We also obtain services from a wide range of third-party service providers and have outsourced some business and information technology functions in various jurisdictions.
There continues to be an increasing number of information security compromises and privacy breaches across industry sectors, governments and individuals. The increasing scope and complexity of malicious activity poses a significant risk to our systems and these risks may be exacerbated by the breadth of our operations, our geographic footprint and the complexity of our technology systems. A serious security or privacy breach of either an internal or third-party service provider’s computer system that contains sensitive business, Client and/or employee information may result in business interruption, theft or misuse of confidential information, regulatory penalties and scrutiny, litigation, reputational damage and may have an adverse impact on current and future business opportunities with our Clients, employees and business relationships. We continue to actively monitor for increases in malicious activity due to escalating geopolitical tensions across the globe.
In particular, privacy breaches could occur and may result in unauthorized access, use or disclosure of personal information. Many jurisdictions in which we do business are developing and implementing cyber security reporting requirements and more stringent consumer privacy legislation, often with greater enforcement powers for regulators and higher fines and penalties for organizations.
We continue investing in people, processes, and technology to strengthen our abilities to respond to the evolving threat landscape. Our well-established security controls and processes are intent on protecting our information and computer systems and the information entrusted to us by our Clients and employees. Examples of our established controls and processes include:
•Our Information Security framework is overseen by the Chief Information Security Officer, supported by senior leadership and by our Operational Risk Management Framework.
•Our Information Security framework and governance controls (policies, procedures, training) are aligned with recognized industry standards and are compliant with applicable laws and regulations. The security framework also includes technology and process safeguards and regularly promotes secure behavioural practices.
•As part of our layered security approach, we deliver general security awareness training sessions to all employees every year that is reinforced with regular awareness resources and activities.
•Our Chief Privacy Officer oversees the global privacy program and sets direction for privacy compliance across the enterprise. Our global privacy program monitors adherence to our global privacy commitments, local laws and local privacy policies.
•Over 30 Privacy Officers across the enterprise monitor emerging privacy legislation, help our businesses make privacy-related decisions and provide guidance on handling personal information.
•We deliver general privacy training annually to all employees supported by targeted training as needed, and provide regular monitoring and reporting.
•Our protection strategy leverages information security risk assessments and privacy impact assessments to evaluate potential risks.
•We carry cyber risk insurance to help mitigate the impact of security and privacy incidents.
The threat environment is rapidly and constantly changing, and there remains a possibility that our processes and controls could be unsuccessful in detecting or preventing a security breach. We remain vulnerable, and work with third parties who may also be vulnerable, to computer viruses and other types of malicious software, cyber-attacks and hacking attempts from unauthorized persons, the physical theft of
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 75
computer systems, internal programming or human errors, fraud, or other disruptive problems or events. There is also a risk that certain internal controls fail, which could also exacerbate the consequences from such events.
Human Resources Risk
Our ability to achieve business objectives can be adversely affected if we are unable to attract, retain or effectively deploy resources with the in-depth knowledge and necessary skills required, or are unable to design compensation and talent programs that effectively drive employee behaviour and shape corporate culture. Failure to manage Human Resources risk can also lead to direct financial and reputational loss including losses arising from activity that is inconsistent with Human Rights or employment laws or health and safety regulations.
To mitigate this risk, we have comprehensive Human Resource policies, practices and programs in place to ensure compliance with employment legislation, minimize the risk of employee misconduct, and proactively develop employee skills, capabilities and behaviours to meet future business needs.
Regulatory Compliance, Legal and Conduct Risk
We are subject to extensive regulatory oversight by financial services regulators in the jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Failure to comply with applicable laws or to conduct our business consistent with changing regulatory or public expectations could adversely impact our reputation and may lead to regulatory investigations, examinations, proceedings, settlements, penalties, fines, restrictions on our business, litigation or an inability to carry out our business strategy.
As a business with external Clients and stakeholders, we face many operational risks, including, legal, fraud, privacy, financial crimes, market conduct, and business conduct. Examples of how these operational risks may affect our business are outlined below:
a.Legal Risk: during the normal course of operating our business, we are subject to the risk of adverse litigation including class action lawsuits. Such litigation could result in reputational damage and financial loss.
b.Fraud Risk: both internal and external fraud are possibilities within our business, such as opening policies under other people’s names. Such actions could result in reputational damage and lawsuits.
c.Privacy Risk: any leakage of personal information could have ramifications for our business and may lead to lawsuits and reputational damage.
d.Financial Crimes Risk: non-compliance with regulatory requirements and the failure to manage the risk around Money-Laundering, Terrorist Financing, Sanctions, Bribery and Corruption can lead to financial loss, reputational damage, business sanctions.
e.Market Conduct Risk: the risk of unfair treatment of Clients, for example, as a result of inadequate or failed processes or inappropriate behaviours, offerings, or interactions by the Enterprise, its Employees, Agents, Distributors, or other third parties. This includes risk arising from non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements and how we design, develop, market, distribute, sell or service our products to our Clients and may result in reputational damage and financial loss.
f.Business Conduct Risk: the risk arising from the administration of the firm that is not compliant with applicable laws and regulations, which may result in reputational damage, business sanctions and financial loss.
As an international organization, we are subject to anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate in, each of which include significant civil and criminal penalties if breached. Our policies, including our Code of Conduct, require strict adherence to these laws. We, or our joint ventures, Distributors or other third-parties acting on our behalf, may from time to time interact with government officials, which presents a heightened risk of censure under anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws if our or our business partners' due diligence or other procedures when interacting with government officials are deemed inadequate.
Financial services regulators and other government agencies in jurisdictions we operate regularly make inquiries, conduct investigations and administer examinations with respect to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. As well, regulators and governmental authorities, industry groups and rating agencies have developed initiatives regarding market conduct. Financial services regulators and other governmental authorities in many of the countries in which we operate have raised issues and commenced regulatory inquiries, investigations and proceedings with respect to current and past business practices in the financial services industry and have given greater emphasis to the investigation of those practices. Current and future regulatory investigations, examinations, proceedings, and civil actions arising out of such matters could adversely affect our reputation, and may result in settlements, penalties, fines, restrictions on our business, litigation or an inability to carry out our business strategy or may cause us to make changes to our business and compliance practices, policies and procedures, which in turn could impact our profitability and future financial results and increase our litigation risk.
Under the Insurance Companies Act and the Supervisory Information (Insurance) Regulations (Canada) and pursuant to similar restrictions in other jurisdictions, we are prohibited from directly or indirectly disclosing any supervisory information relating to SLF Inc., Sun Life Assurance and their affiliates.
Our Chief Compliance Officer oversees our comprehensive Enterprise-wide compliance framework, which is aligned with guidance from OSFI and other regulators. This framework promotes proactive, risk-based management of compliance and regulatory risk, and includes Enterprise and business segment policies and operating guidelines, programs to promote awareness of laws and regulations that impact us, ongoing monitoring of emerging legal issues and regulatory changes and training programs.
•The employee training programs include anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing, sanctions, anti-bribery and corruption, fraud, privacy and information security risk management.
•Effective governance, oversight and implementation is a coordinated effort between first and second lines of defence functions. Second line oversight and effective challenge relies on a network of compliance officers.
•The Chief Compliance Officer reports regularly to the Board and Board Committees on the health of the compliance program, key compliance risks, emerging regulatory trends, escalation of significant issues and key risk indicators.
Information Technology Risk
The use of technology and computer systems is essential in supporting and maintaining business operations. We use technology to support virtually all aspects of our business and operations. The rapidly changing business environment increases the risk of our technology strategy not being agile enough to adapt to new business demands in a timely manner leading to financial losses, increased costs and the inability to meet Client needs.
76 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Initiatives supporting our business strategy rely on developing innovative information technology solutions on a timely basis. Although every reasonable precaution is taken to ensure information technology systems remain available, stable, and current, it is not possible to fully eliminate all risk. Some changes and upgrades are extremely complex and there is a chance that an undetected technical flaw may exist, which, when implemented, stops or disrupts critical information technology systems or business applications.
Third-Party Risk
We engage in a variety of third-party relationships, including with distributors, independent contractors, outsourcing service providers and suppliers. Our profitability or reputation could be impacted if these third parties are unable to meet their ongoing service commitments or fail to perform to expected standards.
An interruption in our relationship with certain third parties or other parties engaged by such third parties, the impairment of their reputation or creditworthiness, their failure to provide contracted services in the manner agreed or in accordance with applicable laws and regulations,
or the ability to timely and cost effectively transition to alternate third parties in the event of a disruption could materially and adversely affect our business objectives or expose us to regulatory fines and/or reputational harm.
To manage these risks, we have established Company-wide policies and guidelines which are consistent with OSFI's and other local regulatory requirements, and which set out our requirements to identify, assess, manage, monitor and report on third-party risks. Our program includes third-party risk assessments and a risk-based approach to conducting due diligence. The key elements and risks associated with the third party are documented in the form of a written agreement, and the company monitors performance of its third parties in a manner that is commensurate to the size, risk, scope and complexity of the third-party relationship.
Business Disruption Risk
To conduct operations, our businesses are dependent on the availability of a range of resources including trained employees, physical locations, access to technology and third parties.
A sustained failure of one or more of our key business processes or systems could materially and adversely impact our business, operations and employees. These failures can result from disruption of our processes and systems due to a range of risks including utility outages, fires, floods, severe storms, cyber-attacks, terrorism and other human-made attacks, natural disasters and other events. We have experienced increased incidents and impacts of disruption due to weather events such as tropical storms and flooding in the geographies in which we operate, as well as earthquakes, and pandemic risks.
Business disruptions can also occur due to changes in environmental risk. The related impacts have been highlighted above under the heading Environmental and Social Risk. Also, because some of our business processes are performed by third parties and some of our systems interface with, or are dependent on, third-party systems, we could experience service interruptions if these third-party operations or systems are degraded and/or fail.
To mitigate these risks, we have implemented a business continuity management program to regularly test and facilitate the recovery of critical business operations. This program encompasses business continuity, crisis management and disaster recovery planning, and includes periodic testing of these plans.
Our policy, guidelines and operating procedures establish consistent processes to manage the impact to key business functions and operations and to support effective and efficient resumption should a major disruption occur. In addition to regular updates and testing of business continuity plans for critical business operations, we conduct mandatory business continuity awareness training for all employees annually and have off-site backup facilities and failover capability designed to minimize downtime and accelerate recovery time in the event of a major disruption.
Model Risk
We use complex models to support many business functions including product development and pricing, capital management, valuation, financial reporting, planning, hedging, asset-liability management, risk management and advanced analytics (such as artificial intelligence, predictive modelling and decision making algorithms). Model risk is the risk of loss, either in the form of financial loss, inappropriate or poor business decisions, damage to reputation, or other adverse impact, arising from inaccurate model outputs or incorrect use or interpretation of model outputs.
Model risk can arise from many sources including
•inappropriate methodologies,
•assumptions or parameters,
•incorrect use of source data,
•inaccurate or untimely source data,
•incorrect application or operator errors,
•increasing product complexity, and
•regulatory expectations.
If the models' methodologies and assumptions are not appropriately set or well controlled, or data or implementation errors occur in the models, this could result in a negative impact on our results and financial position.
Many of our methods and models for managing risk and exposures are based upon the use of observed historical precedents for financial market behaviour, credit experience and insurance risks. As a result, these methods may not fully predict future risk exposures, which can be significantly greater than our historical measures indicate. Other risk management methods depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, Clients, catastrophic occurrence or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible to us. However, this information may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date, properly evaluated or necessarily indicative of ultimate realized experience. As we review and update our models, changes might be made to valuation methods and assumptions, which may impact our results.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 77
To manage model risk, we have established robust, Company-wide model risk management procedures over the models' life cycle with respect to building, using, changing and retiring models. The policy and operating guidelines set out minimum, risk-based requirements to ensure that models are effectively controlled, maintained and appropriately understood by users.
Information Management Risk
As an international provider of financial services, we deal with extensive information across a number of countries.
Information management risk is the:
a.inability to capture, manage, retain and appropriately dispose of business records,
b.the inability to provide data that is valid, complete, accurate, consistent, unique, or timely to support business decisions, and
c.the inability to manage data location and cross-border access appropriately.
Failure to manage these risks could have financial or reputational impacts, and may lead to regulatory proceedings, penalties, and litigation. To manage and monitor information management risk, we have a data governance framework, which includes a records management program, data quality best practices, and data residency controls.
We continue to evolve our risk management best practices to manage risks associated with Generative-AI as we identify use cases and run experiments designed to identify opportunities.
vi. Liquidity Risk
Risk Description
Liquidity risk is the possibility that we will not be able to fund all cash outflow commitments and collateral requirements as they fall due. This includes the risk of being forced to sell assets at depressed prices resulting in realized losses on sale. This risk also includes restrictions on our ability to efficiently allocate capital among our subsidiaries due to various market and regulatory constraints on the movement of funds. Our funding obligations arise in connection with the payment of policyholder benefits, expenses, reinsurance settlements, asset purchases, investment commitments, interest on debt, and dividends on common and preferred shares. Sources of available cash flow include general fund premiums and deposits, investment related inflows (such as maturities, principal repayments, investment income and proceeds of asset sales), proceeds generated from financing activities, and dividends and interest payments from subsidiaries. We have various financing transactions and derivative contracts under which we may be required to pledge collateral or to make payments to our counterparties for the decline in market value of specified assets. The amount of collateral or payments required may increase under certain circumstances (such as changes to interest rates, credit spreads, equity markets or foreign exchange rates), which could adversely affect our liquidity.
Under stress conditions, increases in funding obligations can occur in conjunction with reductions in cost effective sources of available cash inflow. In particular, adverse stress scenarios could involve increases in policyholder cash surrenders and terminations and decreases in the amounts of premiums and deposits being generated by existing and new Clients. Adverse capital market conditions may also be associated with a reduction in available market liquidity and clearing prices for expected asset sales, and reductions in the level of cash inflows (dividends, interest payments and expected maturities) on continuing portfolio investments. These developments could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
We engage in various transactions including repurchase agreements and other capital markets transactions to meet short-term cash requirements. The cost and our ability to execute these transactions may be negatively impacted by illiquid or volatile markets. Disruption in the financial markets may limit our access to capital in the event we are required to seek additional liquidity to operate our businesses. This will result in increased costs to raise capital coupled with less desirable terms or maturities which would decrease future profitability and financial flexibility.
SLF Inc. is a holding company for its insurance, wealth and asset management subsidiaries and does not have significant operations of its own. Dividends and interest payments from its subsidiaries are its principal sources of cash. If the cash received from its subsidiaries is insufficient, then it may be required to raise debt or equity externally or sell some of its assets. We are subject to various regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The ability of SLF Inc.'s subsidiaries to pay dividends and transfer funds is regulated in certain jurisdictions and may require local regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of specific conditions in certain circumstances. Through effective cash management and capital planning, SLF Inc. ensures that its subsidiaries, as a whole and on a stand-alone basis, are properly funded and maintain adequate liquidity to meet obligations, both individually and in aggregate.
In addition, rating agencies publish credit ratings of securities issued by SLF Inc. and its subsidiaries, which have an impact on the interest rates paid by those companies on borrowed funds. A material downgrade in the issuer credit ratings could limit our access to capital or increase the cost of borrowing and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
We have established financing arrangements that support NAIC statutory reserves for universal life policies issued by Sun Life Assurance in the U.S. Our ability to support these reserves with these financing structures can be negatively impacted by market conditions and regulatory changes. Further, these financings, in all or in part, are treated as operating leverage by the rating agencies. If, due to a change in rating agency methodology or position, the rating agencies cease to treat these financings as operating leverage, without providing any grandfathering provisions, there may be an adverse impact on our credit and financial strength ratings.
78 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Liquidity Risk Management Governance and Control
We generally maintain a conservative liquidity position and employ a wide range of liquidity risk management practices and controls, which are described below:
•Liquidity risk governance practices are in place, including independent monitoring and review and reporting to senior management and the Risk Committee.
•Liquidity is managed in accordance with our Asset Liability Management Policy and operating guidelines.
•Liquidity contingency plans are maintained for the management of liquidity in a liquidity event.
•Stress testing is performed by comparing liquidity coverage risk metrics under a one-month stress scenario to our policy thresholds. These liquidity coverage risk metrics are measured and managed at the enterprise and legal entity levels.
•Stress testing of our collateral is performed by comparing collateral coverage ratios to our policy thresholds.
•Cash Management and asset-liability management programs support our ability to maintain our financial position by ensuring that sufficient cash flow and liquid assets are available to cover potential funding requirements. We invest in various types of assets with a view of matching them to our liabilities of various durations.
•Internal capital targets are established at an enterprise level to cover all risks and are above minimum regulatory and supervisory levels. Actual capital levels are monitored to ensure they exceed internal targets.
•We actively manage and monitor our capital and asset levels, and the diversification and credit quality of our investments.
•Various credit facilities for general corporate purposes are maintained.
Based on our historical cash flows and liquidity management processes, we believe that the cash flows from our operating activities will continue to provide sufficient liquidity for us to satisfy Client obligations, service debt obligations and to pay other expenses as they fall due.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 79
Maturity Analysis for Insurance Contracts
The following tables present the undiscounted estimated future cash flows of insurance contract and reinsurance contract held assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. These cash flows include estimates related to the timing and payment of death and disability claims, policy surrenders, policy maturities, annuity payments, minimum guarantees on segregated fund products, policyholder dividends, amounts on deposit, commissions and premium taxes offset by contractual future premiums and fees on in-force contracts. These estimated cash flows are based on the best estimated assumptions used in the determination of insurance contract and reinsurance contract held assets and liabilities. Due to the use of assumptions, actual cash flows will differ from these estimates. Amounts payable on demand, which includes amounts on deposit, dividends on deposit, outstanding claims and policyholder account values, are included in the 1 year or less time band. Amounts in this table include the liability for incurred claims and liability for remaining coverage for contracts measured using the premium allocation approach ("PAA"). The amounts included in the table differ from the carrying value of the portfolio mainly due to discounting and risk adjustments.
As at December 31,
2024
2023
Insurance contract liabilities:
Within 1 Year(1)
$
11,269
$
11,428
1 Year to 2 Years
3,254
3,670
2 Years to 3 Years
3,363
3,887
3 Years to 4 Years
4,059
4,128
4 Years to 5 Years
5,211
4,451
Over 5 years
729,030
556,052
Total
$
756,186
$
583,616
Insurance contract assets:
Within 1 Year
$
(633)
$
(463)
1 Year to 2 Years
(332)
(323)
2 Years to 3 Years
(272)
(276)
3 Years to 4 Years
(263)
(248)
4 Years to 5 Years
(241)
(225)
Over 5 years
(3,935)
(3,305)
Total
$
(5,676)
$
(4,840)
Reinsurance contract held liabilities:
Within 1 Year
$
110
$
140
1 Year to 2 Years
99
83
2 Years to 3 Years
101
88
3 Years to 4 Years
104
91
4 Years to 5 Years
107
95
Over 5 years
4,769
5,036
Total
$
5,290
$
5,533
Reinsurance contract held assets:
Within 1 Year(1)
$
(847)
$
(520)
1 Year to 2 Years
(652)
(54)
2 Years to 3 Years
(685)
(69)
3 Years to 4 Years
(707)
(105)
4 Years to 5 Years
(728)
(130)
Over 5 years
(9,405)
(11,330)
Total
$
(13,024)
$
(12,208)
(1) Includes amounts payable on demand of $5,177 million (2023 - $4,800 million), and $(29) million (2023 - $(33) million) for Insurance contract liabilities and Reinsurance contract held assets, respectively.
80 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Maturity Analysis - Other Financial Liabilities
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of our significant financial liabilities and contractual commitments other than insurance contracts as at December 31, 2024 and 2023:
Financial Liabilities and Contractual Obligations
December 31, 2024
($ millions)
Within 1 year
1 year to 3 years
3 years to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total
Investment contract liabilities(1)
$
6,157
$
2,351
$
1,413
$
1,692
$
11,613
Senior debentures and unsecured financing(2)
2,133
28
28
519
2,708
Subordinated debt(2)
225
451
585
7,248
8,509
Bond repurchase agreements
2,840
—
—
—
2,840
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
10,085
—
—
—
10,085
Lease liabilities(3)
166
262
207
421
1,056
Secured borrowings from mortgage securitization
461
758
382
380
1,981
Borrowed funds(2)
23
107
244
31
405
Credit facilities
2,126
—
—
—
2,126
Total liabilities
$
24,216
$
3,957
$
2,859
$
10,291
$
41,323
Contractual commitments:(4)
Contractual loans, equities and mortgages
$
1,242
$
985
$
576
$
2,054
$
4,857
Total contractual commitments
$
1,242
$
985
$
576
$
2,054
$
4,857
December 31, 2023
($ millions)
Within 1 year
1 year to 3 years
3 years to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total
Investment contract liabilities(1)
$
5,728
$
2,518
$
1,442
$
1,727
$
11,415
Senior debentures and unsecured financing(2)
2,347
28
28
533
2,936
Subordinated debt(2)
204
410
554
7,192
8,360
Bond repurchase agreements
2,705
—
—
—
2,705
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
8,665
—
—
—
8,665
Lease liabilities(3)
188
319
228
534
1,269
Secured borrowings from mortgage securitization
306
885
560
535
2,286
Borrowed funds(2)
86
103
14
162
365
Credit facilities
2,330
—
—
—
2,330
Total liabilities
$
22,559
$
4,263
$
2,826
$
10,683
$
40,331
Contractual commitments:(4)
Contractual loans, equities and mortgages
$
39
$
1,199
$
915
$
2,756
$
4,909
Total contractual commitments
$
39
$
1,199
$
915
$
2,756
$
4,909
(1) These amounts represent the undiscounted estimated cash flows of investment contract liabilities on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
(2) Payments due based on maturity dates and include expected interest payments. Actual redemption of certain securities may occur sooner as some include an option for the issuer to call the security at par at an earlier date.
(3) Liabilities associated with the lease commitments are included on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
(4) Contractual commitments are not reported on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Additional information on these commitments is included in Note 22 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Additional information on liquidity risk can be found in Note 6 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 81
vii. Other Risks
International Operations
The future success of our businesses in our international operations depends in large part on our ability to grow and compete in the markets where we operate. Challenges in these markets pose strategic and execution risk including our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and executives with local experience and critical skills, geopolitical, legal, economic, competition or other risks, risks associated with joint venture operations, developing and executing our risk management practices, and our ability to attract, retain, expand and diversify distribution channels.
If we are unable to attract, retain and engage qualified employees and executives with relevant experience and critical business skills, our ability to grow our business in our international operations as quickly as planned may be limited. Competition for qualified employees and distribution partners in our international operations, in particular the Asian markets, continues to be strong and could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain talent.
Our international operations may face geopolitical, legal and regulatory, economic, competitive, operational or other risks that we may not face in our domestic operations. Examples of this type of risk are the risk of changes in regulation, geopolitical risks due to changes in government, discriminatory regulation, political instability, nationalization or expropriation of assets, changes to the maximum level of non-domestic ownership, price controls and exchange controls or other restrictions that could prevent us from transferring funds from these operations out of the countries in which they operate or converting local currencies we hold into Canadian dollars or other currencies.
Capital markets in certain international markets may not have the same depth, liquidity or range of investment options generally available in other markets in which we operate. In particular, the more limited availability of long-duration assets exposes our Asian operations to higher asset-liability management costs and potential risk.
We have entered into joint venture arrangements in certain markets in Asia, where we may have a lesser degree of control over these businesses that may expose us to additional operational, financial, compliance and legal risks. We may be dependent on our joint venture counterparty for capital, product distribution, local market knowledge, or other resources. Our ability to exercise management control or influence over these joint ventures and the success of our investments in them will depend on the cooperation between the joint venture participants and the terms of the joint venture agreements, which allocate control among the joint venture participants. If we are unable to effectively manage these joint ventures, or any joint venture counterparty fails to meet its obligations under the joint venture arrangement, encounters financial difficulty, elects to alter, modify or terminate the relationship, or a joint venture does not comply with local legislation or regulations, we may be unable to achieve our objectives and our results of operations and brand may be negatively impacted.
Capital Adequacy
Capital adequacy risk is the risk that our capital position is not or will not be sufficient to withstand adverse economic conditions, to maintain our financial strength, to allow us and our subsidiaries to support ongoing operations and to take advantage of opportunities for expansion, and to support the risk taking activity in pursuit of our business objectives.
The strength of our capital position depends in part upon the level of and changes in interest rates and equity prices, credit experience, mortality and morbidity experience, currency rate fluctuations and our overall profitability.
Various factors may negatively impact our capital ratios, and may impair our financial position and our ability to execute our business strategies and plans, such as:
•Declining equity markets
•Downgrades in ratings
•Changes in interest rates
•Changes in credit spreads on corporate bonds and asset backed securities
•Lower earnings
•Inability to access capital markets on a timely basis
In addition, regulatory changes being considered by other regulators world-wide may adversely impact the capital of SLF Inc. and its insurance subsidiaries.
Credit and Financial Strength Ratings
Financial strength ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding an insurance company's ability to meet its policy obligations. Credit ratings indicate the opinions of rating agencies regarding an issuer's ability to meet the terms of debt, preferred share and Tier 1 hybrid capital obligations in a timely manner, and are important factors in a company’s overall funding profile and ability to access external capital. A downgrade by a rating agency in the credit ratings of securities issued by SLF Inc. and its subsidiaries or the financial strength ratings of SLF Inc.'s insurance company subsidiaries could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The financial strength rating of an insurance company is a key competitive factor in marketing its products and in attracting and retaining agents and distributors. If our credit or financial strength ratings are downgraded, our financial condition, competitive position and results of operations could be negatively impacted in many ways, including:
•Reducing new sales of insurance products, annuities and investment products;
•Requiring us to reduce prices for products and services to remain competitive;
•Higher level of surrenders and withdrawals;
•Higher reinsurance costs;
•Increasing our cost of capital and limiting our access to the capital markets, thus reducing our financial flexibility;
•Reducing our ability to enter into normal course derivative or hedging transactions and increasing the costs associated with such transactions; and
•Adversely affecting our relationships with our advisors and third-party distributors of our products.
82 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
In addition, downgrades in our credit or financial strength ratings below thresholds specified in certain of our derivative agreements, reinsurance agreements and other agreements could result in the counterparties to those agreements having the right to terminate those agreements or to require that we provide support for those agreements in the form of collateral or letters of credit.
Changes in methodologies and criteria used by rating agencies could also result in downgrades that do not reflect changes in the general economic conditions or our financial condition.
Additional information concerning our ratings is provided in the AIF under the heading Security Ratings.
Tax Matters
The validity and measurement of tax benefits associated with various tax positions taken or expected to be taken in our tax filings are a matter of tax law and are subject to interpretation. Tax laws are complex and their interpretation requires significant judgment. The provision for income taxes reflects management’s interpretation of the relevant tax laws and its best estimate of income tax implications of the transactions and events during the period. There can be a risk that tax authorities could differ in their interpretation of the relevant laws and could assert that tax positions taken by the company give rise to a need for reassessment, including reassessment under specific or general anti-avoidance rules or transfer pricing provisions.
The assessment of additional taxes, interest and penalties or damage to the Company’s reputation could be materially adverse to our future results of operations and financial position.
Under the liability method of accounting for income taxes, deferred tax assets are recognized for the carryforward of unused tax losses and tax credits, as well as amounts that have already been recorded in the financial statements, but will not result in deductible amounts in determining taxable income until future periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent of the probability that taxable profit will be available against which the future tax deductions and unused tax losses can be utilized.
At the end of each reporting period, we must assess the value of our deferred tax assets. The determination of our deferred tax assets is dependent upon projections of future taxable profits. Our projections require significant judgments and estimates about future events, including global economic conditions and the future profitability of our businesses. If the profitability of our businesses is lower than our projections or if our outlook diminishes significantly, we may be required to reduce the value of our deferred tax assets. Any change to our deferred tax assets could have a material adverse impact on our future results of operations and financial position.
We are also subject to changing income tax regulations. We currently have an effective income tax rate that is lower than the Canadian statutory income tax rate for corporations. The Company reflects favourable tax impacts in its financial statements from certain tax benefits, including but not limited to tax-exempt or low-taxed investment income, dividends received deductions, tax credits (from certain investments or from taxes paid on foreign source income), and favourable tax rates in certain jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, many of our life insurance products benefit Clients with preferred tax treatment under various tax regimes. For example life insurance policies and annuity contracts in the U.S. and Canada allow for the deferral or elimination of taxation on earnings (inside buildup) accrued under the policy. There is a risk that tax legislation, administrative guidance or legislative developments could lessen or eliminate some of the benefits currently available to the Company or its policyholders. This risk could result in lower product sales or increased lapses of policies, and could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial position.
From time to time, governments in countries in which we operate enact changes to statutory corporate income tax rates. A change in income tax rate requires us to review and re-measure our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the date of substantive enactment. As of December 31, 2024, the Company reported a $3,624 million net deferred tax asset in its Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, primarily in Canada. Any future tax rate reductions in jurisdictions where we carry a net deferred tax asset could result in a reduction in the carrying value of the deferred tax asset and a corresponding income tax expense at the time of substantive enactment of a rate reduction.
The Pillar Two global minimum tax rules apply to us effective January 1, 2024 and have been substantively enacted in several jurisdictions, including Canada, whose Global Minimum Tax Act became enacted in June 2024. The Pillar Two legislation requires the ultimate parent entity of a group to pay top-up tax, on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, on profits of its subsidiaries that are taxed below 15%. Our subsidiaries that are currently subject to a statutory tax rate or to a tax regime that could result in taxing profits at a rate below 15% include those in Bermuda, Hong Kong and Ireland. The Pillar Two legislation is expected to increase the effective tax rate on underlying net income by approximately one to two percentage points.
L. Additional Financial Disclosure
1. Selected Annual Information
($ millions, after-tax, unless otherwise stated)
2024
2023
2022
Total revenue (pre-tax)
38,633
40,774
5,769
Common shareholders' net income (loss)
3,049
3,086
2,871
Reported basic earnings per share ($)
5.27
5.27
4.90
Reported earnings per share (diluted) ($)
5.26
5.26
4.89
Total assets
370,721
333,241
323,608
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 83
2. Items related to Statement of Operations
i. Business Group Summary Statements of Operations
2024
2023
($ millions)
Canada
U.S.
Asset Management
Asia
Corporate
Total
Total
Insurance revenue
8,778
12,296
—
1,554
9
22,637
21,356
Investment income (loss)
5,039
316
281
1,648
131
7,415
11,586
Fee income
1,771
489
6,391
329
(399)
8,581
7,832
Revenue
15,588
13,101
6,672
3,531
(259)
38,633
40,774
Insurance service expenses
7,309
11,345
—
974
3
19,631
18,450
Reinsurance contract held net (income) expense
4
(145)
—
56
—
(85)
69
Insurance finance (income) expenses from insurance contracts issued
3,843
63
—
1,233
—
5,139
9,675
Reinsurance finance (income) expenses
81
(121)
—
(11)
—
(51)
(59)
(Decrease) increase in investment contract liabilities
390
—
—
3
—
393
331
Other income
—
—
(163)
—
—
(163)
(169)
Interest expenses
262
116
172
105
9
664
552
Operating expenses and commissions
1,989
1,127
4,596
701
353
8,766
7,995
Total expenses
13,878
12,385
4,605
3,061
365
34,294
36,844
Income tax expense (benefit)
395
133
411
124
(23)
1,040
461
Dividends on preferred shares and distributions on other equity instruments
—
—
—
—
80
80
79
Non-controlling interests and participating policyholders' income in net income of subsidiaries
98
27
128
(83)
—
170
304
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
1,217
556
1,528
429
(681)
3,049
3,086
2024 vs. 2023
Canada
Canada's revenue decreased $1.6 billion in 2024, reflecting lower net investment income primarily from fair value changes of invested assets partially offset by higher insurance revenue.
U.S.
U.S.'s revenue decreased $0.4 billion in 2024, reflecting lower net investment income primarily from fair value changes of invested assets partially offset by higher insurance revenue.
Asset Management
Asset Management's revenue increased $0.5 billion in 2024, driven by higher fee income in MFS and SLC Management.
Asia
Asia's revenue decreased $0.5 billion in 2024, reflecting lower net investment income primarily from fair value changes of invested assets, partially offset by higher insurance revenue.
Corporate
Corporate's loss of $0.3 billion in 2024 compared to a loss of $0.1 billion in 2023, primarily from the sale of Sun Life UK in Q2'23.
ii. Revenue
Revenues are primarily derived from life and health insurance, investment management and annuities, and mutual funds, as well as Corporate investments and earnings on capital not attributed to a strategic business segment. Total revenue is comprised of: (i) insurance revenue; (ii) net investment income; and (iii) fee income. Total revenue excludes investment result for insurance contracts for account of segregated fund holders.
Insurance revenue is comprised of the portion of premiums that cover expected claims and directly attributable expenses in the period, as well as the release of risk adjustment and the amortization of CSM for the period. Insurance revenue excludes the portion of premiums that cover repayment of investment components.
Net investment income is comprised of interest income, dividends, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and other investment income earned on general fund assets. Net investment income, such as net rental income, fair value changes, and foreign exchange gains (losses) are also earned from non-financial instruments. Net investment income can experience volatility arising from the quarterly fluctuation in the
84 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
value of FVTPL assets and foreign currency changes on assets and liabilities, which may in turn affect the comparability of revenue from period to period. The change in fair value of FVTPL assets is driven largely by market-related factors such as interest rates, credit spreads and equity returns. The debt and equity securities that support insurance contract liabilities are generally designated or classified as FVTPL and changes in fair values of these assets are recorded in net investment income in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in the fair values of the FVTPL assets supporting insurance contract liabilities are largely offset by a corresponding change in the liabilities excluding those for account of segregated fund holders.
Fee income includes distribution fees, fund management and other asset-based fees, primarily earned in the Asset Management segment. Fee income also includes administrative service and other fees primarily earned in the Canada and U.S. segments. Premium and deposit equivalents from administrative services only ("ASO"), as well as deposits received by the Company on investment contracts such as segregated funds, mutual funds and managed funds are not included in revenue; however, the Company does receive fee income from these contracts, which is included in revenue. Fee income and ASO premium and deposit equivalents are an important part of our business and as a result, revenue does not fully represent sales and other activity taking place during the respective periods.
($ millions)
2024
2023
Insurance revenue
Annuities
2,395
2,258
Life insurance
5,620
5,356
Health insurance
14,622
13,742
Total insurance revenue
22,637
21,356
Net Investment income (loss)
7,415
11,586
Fee income
8,581
7,832
Total revenue
38,633
40,774
2024 vs. 2023
Total revenue decreased by $2.1 billion, reflecting lower net investment income primarily from fair value changes of invested assets partially offset by higher insurance revenue. Foreign exchange translation increased revenue by $0.3 billion. By business group, revenue reflected lower net investment income in Canada, the U.S., and Asia, partially offset by higher insurance revenue primarily in Canada, the U.S, and Asia.
Insurance revenue increased $1.3 billion, primarily driven by higher insurance revenue in Canada, the U.S and Asia.
Net investment income decreased $4.2 billion primarily from fair value changes of invested assets reflecting the impact of interest rates.
Fee income increased $0.7 billion driven by higher fee income in MFS, SLC Management and in our other wealth and asset management businesses.
iii. Expenses
($ millions)
2024
2023
Expenses
Insurance service expenses
19,631
18,450
Reinsurance contract held net (income) expense
(85)
69
Insurance finance (income) expenses from insurance contracts issued
5,139
9,675
Reinsurance finance (income) expenses
(51)
(59)
(Decrease) increase in investment contract liabilities
393
331
Other income
(163)
(169)
Interest expenses
664
552
Operating expenses and commissions
8,766
7,995
Total expenses
34,294
36,844
Total expenses of $34.3 billion decreased $2.6 billion in 2024 compared to the prior year, primarily driven by lower insurance finance expenses from insurance contracts issued partially offset by higher insurance service expenses.
Insurance service expenses of $19.6 billion increased $1.2 billion in 2024 compared to the prior year, primarily driven by increases in the U.S. and Canada.
Reinsurance contract held net income of $0.1 billion compared to $0.1 billion net expense in the prior year, primarily driven by Canada.
Insurance finance expenses from insurance contracts issued of $5.1 billion decreased $4.5 billion in 2024, primarily driven by Canada, the U.S. and Asia.
Other income of $163 million in 2024 primarily relates to the early termination of a distribution agreement in Asset Management, compared to prior year other income of $169 million relating to the sale of Sun Life UK and the sale of the sponsored markets business in Canada. For additional information, refer to Note 3 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest expenses of $0.7 billion increased $0.1 billion in 2024 compared to the prior year, primarily driven by Canada.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 85
Operating expenses and commissions of $8.8 billion increased $0.8 billion in 2024 compared to the prior year, primarily driven by higher expenses across all businesses, and $85 million of unfavourable foreign exchange translation. For additional information, see Note 17 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
iv. Taxes
Income Taxes
In 2024, we had an income tax expense of $1,040 million on reported net income before taxes of $4,339 million, which resulted in an effective income tax rate of 24.0% (2023 - $461 million, $3,930 million, and 11.7%, respectively).
On an underlying basis(1), in 2024, we had an income tax expense of $834 million on our underlying net income before taxes of $4,831 million, representing an effective income tax rate of 17.3% which is within our expected range of 16% to 22% (2023 - $811 million, $4,685 million, and 17.3%, respectively).
See section D - Profitability - 5 - Income taxes in this document for additional information on our effective tax rates.
3. Items related to Statements of Financial Position
i. Changes in items related to the Statement of Financial Position
Total general fund assets were $221.9 billion as at December 31, 2024 (December 31, 2023 - $204.8 billion), primarily driven by general operating activities and favourable impacts from foreign exchange translation.
The net liabilities balance for insurance contracts issued(2) was $146.9 billion as at December 31, 2024 (December 31, 2023 - $135.5 billion), primarily driven by cash flows, insurance finance income and expenses and foreign currency translation, partially offset by the change in insurance service result.
Total shareholders' equity, including preferred shares and other equity instruments, is $25.6 billion as at December 31, 2024 (December 31, 2023 - $23.6 billion). The change in total shareholders' equity included:
(i)total shareholders' net income of $3,129 million, before preferred share dividends of $80 million; and
(ii)favourable impacts from foreign exchange translation of $1,346 million included in OCI; partially offset by
(iii)common share dividend payments of $1,875 million; and
(iv)a decrease of $855 million from the repurchase and cancellation of common shares.
As at January 31, 2025, SLF Inc. had 572,857,568 common shares, 3,049,926 options to acquire SLF Inc. common shares, and 52,200,000 Class A Shares outstanding.
ii. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we are engaged in a variety of financial arrangements. The principal purposes of these arrangements are to earn management fees and additional spread on a matched book of business and to reduce financing costs.
While most of these activities are reflected on our balance sheet with respect to assets and liabilities, certain of them are either not recorded on our balance sheet or are recorded on our balance sheet in amounts that differ from the full contract or notional amounts. The types of off-balance sheet activities we undertake primarily include asset securitizations and securities lending. For more information, see Note 5 in our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
iii. Goodwill and Intangibles Impairment
The Company completed its annual goodwill and indefinite life intangible asset impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2024. No impairment charges on goodwill were recognized in 2024 and 2023. Impairment charges on intangible assets of $201 million were recognized in 2024 (2023 - $5 million), primarily related to an intangible asset related to bancassurance in Vietnam reflecting updates resulting from changes in regulatory and macro-economic factors.
iv. Commitments, Guarantees, Contingencies and Reinsurance Matters
In the normal course of business, we enter into leasing agreements, outsourcing arrangements and agreements involving indemnities to third parties. We are also engaged in arbitration proceedings from time to time with certain companies that have contracts to provide reinsurance to the Company. Information regarding our commitments, guarantees and contingencies are summarized in Note 22 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. A table summarizing our significant financial liabilities and contractual obligations can be found in this MD&A in the section K - Risk Management - 9 - Risk Categories - vi - Liquidity Risk.
(1)Our effective income tax rate on underlying net income is calculated using underlying net income and income tax expense associated with underlying net income, which excludes amounts attributable to participating policyholders.
(2)For more information about the changes in the net insurance contract liabilities, refer to Note 10 of the 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
86 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
4. Fourth Quarter 2024 Profitability
The following table reconciles our Common shareholders' net income ("reported net income") and underlying net income in the fourth quarter of 2024 and 2023. All factors discussed in this document that impact underlying net income are also applicable to reported net income. Certain adjustments and notable items also impact the CSM, such as mortality experience and assumption changes; see section F - Contractual Service Margin in this document for more information.
($ millions, after-tax)
Q4'24
Q4'23
Underlying net income (loss) by business type(1):
Wealth & asset management
486
439
Group - Health & Protection
266
365
Individual - Protection
339
284
Corporate expenses & other
(126)
(105)
Underlying net income(1)
965
983
Add: Market-related impacts
(179)
(193)
Assumption changes and management actions
11
(1)
Other adjustments
(560)
(40)
Reported net income - Common shareholders
237
749
Underlying ROE(1)
16.5%
18.4%
Reported ROE(1)
4.0%
14.0%
Notable items attributable to reported and underlying net income(1):
Mortality
10
(5)
Morbidity
(22)
91
Lapse and other policyholder behaviour
—
(11)
Expenses
(10)
(26)
Credit(2)
(34)
(18)
Other(3)
16
(2)
(1)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. For more details, see section M - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document. For more information about business types in Sun Life's business groups, see section A - How We Report Our Results in this document.
(2)Credit includes rating changes on assets measured at FVTPL, and the ECL impact for assets measured at FVOCI.
(3)Other notable items are recorded in Net Insurance Service Result and Net Investment Result in the Drivers of Earnings analysis. For more details, see section M - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Quarterly Comparison - Q4'24 vs. Q4'23
Underlying net income(1) of $965 million decreased $18 million or 2%, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management(1) up $47 million: Higher fee income in Asset Management, Canada, and Asia, partially offset by lower net investment results in Canada.
•Group - Health & Protection(1)(2) down $99 million: Unfavourable morbidity experience in U.S. medical stop-loss and less favourable morbidity experience in Canada, partially offset by business growth in Canada.
•Individual - Protection(1)(2) up $55 million: Improved protection experience in Asia and Canada and higher contributions from joint ventures in Asia.
•Corporate expenses & other(1) $(21) million increase in net loss primarily reflecting higher expenses largely from continued investments in our Asia businesses and incentive compensation in Asia.
Reported net income of $237 million decreased $512 million or 68%, driven by:
•Lower tax-exempt investment income of $234 million in Corporate;
•An impairment charge of $186 million on an intangible asset related to bancassurance in Vietnam reflecting updates resulting from changes in regulatory and macro-economic factors; and
•A non-recurring provision in U.S. Dental; partially offset by
•Market-related impacts primarily reflecting improved real estate experience(3).
Foreign exchange translation led to an increase of $16 million in underlying net income and an increase of $17 million in reported net income.
(1)Refer to section D - Profitability in this document for more information on notable items attributable to reported and underlying net income items and section M - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document for a reconciliation between reported net income and underlying net income. For more information about the business types in Sun Life's operating segments/business groups, see section A - How We Report Our Results in this document.
(2)Effective Q1'24, reflects a refinement in the allocation methodology for expenses from Individual - Protection to Group - Health & Protection business types in the U.S. business group.
(3)Real estate experience reflects the difference between the actual value of real estate investments compared to management's longer-term expected returns supporting insurance contract liabilities ("real estate experience").
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 87
The Q4'24 effective income tax rate(1) on underlying net income and reported net income was 17.4% and 63.2% respectively. The effective income tax rate on reported net income reflects the non-deductible impairment charge on an intangible asset in Vietnam as well as lower tax-exempt investment income.
Performance by Business Group - Fourth Quarter
We manage our operations and report our financial results in five business segments. The following section describes the operations and financial performance of Asset Management, Canada, U.S., Asia and Corporate.
The following table sets out the differences between our underlying net income (loss) and reported net income (loss) by business group.
Q4'24
($ millions)
Asset Management
Canada
U.S.
Asia
Corporate
Total
Underlying net income (loss)
360
366
161
175
(97)
965
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(18)
(142)
(74)
27
(14)
(221)
ACMA (pre-tax)
—
(1)
(1)
15
—
13
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(34)
(8)
(143)
(193)
—
(378)
Tax expense (benefit)
18
38
50
(13)
(235)
(142)
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
326
253
(7)
11
(346)
237
Q4'23
Underlying net income (loss)
331
350
253
143
(94)
983
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(11)
(223)
(60)
(142)
—
(436)
ACMA (pre-tax)
—
72
(65)
(1)
—
6
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(39)
(6)
(65)
(8)
—
(118)
Tax expense (benefit)
16
155
38
52
53
314
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
297
348
101
44
(41)
749
Quarterly Comparison - Q4'24 vs. Q4'23
Asset Management
Asset Management underlying net income of $360 million increased $29 million or 9% driven by:
•MFS up $40 million (up US$25 million): Higher fee income from higher average net assets ("ANA") partially offset by higher expenses. The MFS pre-tax net operating profit margin(2) improved to 40.5% for Q4'24, compared to 39.4% in the prior year.
•SLC Management down $11 million: Lower fee-related earnings mostly offset by higher net seed investment income. Fee-related earnings(2) decreased 14% reflecting higher expenses primarily from incentive compensation, partially offset by higher AUM driven by strong capital raising and deployment across the platform. Fee-related earnings margin(2) was 23.0% for Q4'24, compared to 24.2% in the prior year.
Asset Management reported net income of $326 million increased $29 million or 10%, driven by the increase in underlying net income.
Foreign exchange translation led to an increase of $8 million in underlying and reported net income, respectively.
Canada
Underlying net income of $366 million increased $16 million or 5%, reflecting:
•Wealth & asset management up $9 million: Business growth and higher fee income driven by higher AUM largely offset by lower net investment results, including unfavourable credit experience.
•Group - Health & Protection down $6 million: Business growth and higher investment results more than offset by less favourable morbidity experience reflecting higher claims volumes and longer claims durations.
•Individual - Protection up $13 million: Favourable mortality experience driven by lower claims, and higher investment results.
•Lower earnings on surplus across all businesses primarily reflecting lower net interest income.
Reported net income of $253 million decreased $95 million or 27%, reflecting market-related and ACMA impacts. The market-related impacts were primarily from unfavourable interest rate impacts partially offset by improved real estate experience.
(1)Our effective income tax rate on reported net income is calculated using Total income (loss) before income taxes, as detailed in Note 19 in our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Our effective income tax rate on underlying net income is calculated using pre-tax underlying net income, as detailed in section M - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document, and the associated income tax expense.
(2)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. For more details, see section M - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
88 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
U.S.
Underlying net income of US$115 million decreased US$72 million or 39%, driven by:
•Group - Health & Protection(1) down US$71 million: Unfavourable morbidity experience in medical stop-loss driven by claims severity.
•Individual - Protection(1) down US$1 million: In line with the prior year.
Reported net loss was US$1 million compared to reported net income of US$77 million in the prior year, reflecting the decrease in underlying net income and a non-recurring provision in Dental, partially offset by ACMA impacts. Unfavourable interest rate impacts were mostly offset by improved real estate experience.
Foreign exchange translation led to an increase of $4 million in underlying net income and an increase of $1 million in reported net loss.
Asia
Underlying net income of $175 million increased $32 million or 22%, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management up $9 million: Higher fee income primarily driven by higher AUM.
•Individual - Protection up $41 million: Improved protection experience and higher contributions from joint ventures.
•Regional office expenses & other $(18) million increased net loss reflecting continued investments in the business across the region and higher incentive compensation.
Reported net income of $11 million decreased $33 million or 75%, driven by an impairment charge on an intangible asset related to bancassurance in Vietnam reflecting updates resulting from changes in regulatory and macro-economic factors, partially offset by market-related impacts and the increase in underlying net income. The market-related impacts were primarily from favourable interest rate impacts and improved real estate experience.
Foreign exchange translation led to an increase of $4 million in underlying net income and an increase of $6 million in reported net income.
Corporate
Underlying net loss was $97 million, in line with prior year's underlying net loss of $94 million.
Reported net loss was $346 million compared to reported net loss of $41 million in the prior year, reflecting lower tax exempt investment income.
5. Fourth Quarter 2024 Growth
Revenue of $7.5 billion decreased $11.2 billion compared to the same period in 2023, primarily reflecting fair value changes in invested assets driven by rising interest rates. Foreign exchange translation increased revenue by $103 million.
(1)Effective Q1'24, reflects a refinement in the allocation methodology for expenses from Individual - Protection to Group - Health & Protection business types in the U.S. business group.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 89
6. Quarterly Financial Results
The following table provides a summary of our results for the eight most recently completed quarters. A more complete discussion of our historical quarterly results can be found in our Interim and Annual MD&A for the relevant periods.
Quarterly results
($ millions, unless otherwise noted)
Q4'24
Q3'24
Q2'24
Q1'24
Q4'23
Q3'23
Q2'23
Q1'23
Total revenue
7,509
15,333
8,916
6,875
18,684
2,439
7,668
11,983
Common shareholders' net income (loss)
Underlying net income(1)
965
1,016
1,000
875
983
930
920
895
Add: Market-related impacts
(179)
29
(153)
(70)
(193)
23
(220)
(64)
ACMA
11
36
16
(7)
(1)
35
7
(5)
Other adjustments
(560)
267
(217)
20
(40)
(117)
(47)
(20)
Reported net income - Common shareholder
237
1,348
646
818
749
871
660
806
Diluted EPS ($)
Underlying(1)
1.68
1.76
1.72
1.50
1.68
1.59
1.57
1.52
Reported
0.41
2.33
1.11
1.40
1.28
1.48
1.12
1.37
Basic reported EPS ($)
Reported
0.41
2.33
1.11
1.40
1.28
1.49
1.12
1.37
Underlying net income (loss) by segment(1)
Asset Management
360
344
307
282
331
330
296
282
Canada
366
375
402
310
350
338
372
316
U.S.
161
219
204
189
253
185
215
237
Asia
175
170
179
177
143
166
150
141
Corporate
(97)
(92)
(92)
(83)
(94)
(89)
(113)
(81)
Total underlying net income (loss)(1)
965
1,016
1,000
875
983
930
920
895
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(221)
(12)
(169)
(26)
(436)
107
(298)
(99)
ACMA (pre-tax)
13
63
18
(8)
6
41
11
(5)
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(378)
246
(254)
41
(118)
(156)
(89)
(10)
Tax expense (benefit) on above items
(142)
35
51
(64)
314
(51)
116
25
Reported net income (loss) by segment - Common shareholders
Asset Management
326
644
274
284
297
268
248
254
Canada
253
382
292
290
348
365
210
329
U.S.
(7)
339
127
97
101
132
175
168
Asia
11
32
151
235
44
211
122
134
Corporate
(346)
(49)
(198)
(88)
(41)
(105)
(95)
(79)
Total reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
237
1,348
646
818
749
871
660
806
(1)Represents a non-IFRS financial measure. For more details, see section M - Non-IFRS Financial Measures in this document.
Third Quarter 2024
Underlying net income of $1,016 million increased $86 million or 9%, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management up $17 million: Higher fee income in Asset Management, Asia, and Canada, partially offset by unfavourable credit experience in Canada.
•Group - Health & Protection up $60 million: Strong business growth in U.S. Group Benefits and Canada, higher fee-based income in Canada, and improved group life mortality experience in the U.S., partially offset by lower U.S. Dental results.
•Individual - Protection up $9 million: Business growth in Asia and Canada partially offset by unfavourable mortality experience in Asia.
•Corporate expenses & other were in line with prior year.
Reported net income of $1,348 million increased $477 million or 55%, driven by a decrease in SLC Management's estimated acquisition-related liabilities and the increase in underlying net income. Favourable equity market impacts and improved real estate experience were offset by interest rate impacts.
90 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Second Quarter 2024
Underlying net income of $1,000 million increased $80 million or 9%, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management up $36 million: Higher fee income in Asset Management, Canada, and Asia, partially offset by higher expenses in Asset Management.
•Group - Health & Protection down $55 million: Lower results in U.S. Dental primarily reflecting the impact of Medicaid redeterminations and related claims following the end of the Public Health Emergency, less favourable morbidity experience in Canada, and unfavourable morbidity experience in U.S. medical stop-loss, partially offset by strong business growth in U.S. Group Benefits and Canada.
•Individual - Protection up $82 million: Business growth in Asia and Canada, and favourable mortality experience in Canada and the U.S.
•Corporate expenses & other $17 million decrease in net loss driven by lower operating expenses and financing costs.
Reported net income of $646 million decreased $14 million or 2%. Financial discipline remains core to our Client Impact Strategy and business. In Q2'24, we recorded a restructuring charge of $138 million (post-tax $108 million) reflecting actions taken to improve productivity and drive earnings growth at the higher-end of our Medium-Term Financial Objectives. We expect these actions to result in annual savings of approximately $200 million (pre-tax) by 2026. The restructuring charge is offset by the increase in underlying net income; and market-related impacts primarily reflecting interest rates and real estate investments.
First Quarter 2024
Underlying net income of $875 million decreased $20 million from prior year, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management down $3 million: Higher fee income offset by higher expenses in Asset Management, as well as lower net seed investment income in SLC Management.
•Group - Health & Protection down $23 million: Less favourable morbidity experience in U.S. medical stop-loss and lower results in U.S. Dental primarily reflecting the impact of Medicaid redeterminations following the end of the Public Health Emergency, partially offset by strong revenue growth in U.S. Group Benefits, and business growth and improved disability experience in Canada.
•Individual - Protection down $13 million: Lower earnings due to the sale of Sun Life UK partially offset by business growth in Asia.
•Corporate expenses & other $19 million decrease in net loss driven by lower financing costs.
Reported net income of $818 million increased $12 million from prior year, driven by the gains on partial sale of ABSLAMC and the early termination of a distribution agreement in Asset Management, largely offset by the prior year gain on sale of the sponsored markets business in Canada, fair value changes in management's ownership of MFS shares, and the decrease in underlying net income. Unfavourable real estate experience was mostly offset by favourable interest rate impacts.
Fourth Quarter 2023
Underlying net income of $983 million increased $91 million or 10% from prior year, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management up $27 million: Higher Asset Management fee-related earnings and higher investment income driven by volume growth and an increase in yields.
•Group - Health & Protection up $44 million: Business premium growth in the U.S. and Canada, improved disability experience in Canada, and higher investment contributions in the U.S., partially offset by lower results in U.S. Dental.
•Individual - Protection up $53 million: Business growth reflecting good sales momentum in Asia, and higher investment contributions in Canada, partially offset by lower earnings due to the sale of Sun Life UK.
•Corporate expenses & other $(33) million increase in net loss driven by higher operating expenses reflecting business growth and continued investments in the business, partially offset by a lower effective tax rate.
•Higher earnings on surplus primarily driven by higher net interest income and lower realized losses.
Reported net income of $749 million decreased $416 million or 36%, driven by unfavourable market-related impacts primarily reflecting interest rates and real estate experience, the prior year impact of the Canada Tax Rate Change, and fair value changes in management's ownership of MFS shares; partially offset by the increase in underlying net income, the impact of the Bermuda Corporate Income Tax Change; and lower DentaQuest integration costs.
Third Quarter 2023
Underlying net income of $930 million decreased $19 million or 2%, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management up $38 million: Higher investment income driven by volume growth and an increase in yields, and higher Asset Management fee-related earnings.
•Group - Health & Protection up $4 million: Strong revenue growth across all U.S. businesses and better disability experience in Canada, largely offset by health and protection experience in the U.S., and lower fee-related earnings in Canada.
•Individual - Protection down $8 million: Lower earnings due to the sale of Sun Life UK, and lower net investment results in the U.S., partially offset by business growth reflecting good sales momentum during the past year in Asia.
•Corporate expenses & other $(53) million increase in net loss includes higher debt financing costs.
•Higher expenses across business types were driven by volume growth, continued investments in the business, and higher incentive compensation.
Reported net income of $871 million increased $760 million, driven by favourable market-related impacts primarily reflecting interest rates partially offset by real estate experience, a $170 million charge related to the sale of Sun Life UK and a higher increase in SLC Management's acquisition-related liabilities in the prior year, and ACMA impacts; partially offset by fair value changes in management's ownership of MFS shares.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 91
Second Quarter 2023
Underlying net income of $920 million increased $112 million or 14%, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management down $1 million: Higher investment income driven by volume growth and an increase in yields was largely offset by lower fee-based earnings in MFS, reflecting equity market declines over the past year, as well as higher expenses in Canada.
•Group - Health & Protection up $122 million: Strong performance driven by good premium growth and better disability experience in Canada and the U.S., as well as a full quarter of DentaQuest contributions.
•Individual - Protection up $50 million: Higher premiums reflecting good sales momentum during the past year in Asia, and improved insurance experience in Canada and the U.S.
•Corporate expenses & other $(59) million increased net loss driven by higher operating expenses including incentive compensation and an increase in debt financing costs.
•Higher earnings on surplus reflecting an increase in realized gains and net interest income from higher rates.
Reported net income of $660 million decreased $270 million or 29%, driven by market-related impacts primarily reflecting interest rates and real estate investments, the prior year gain on the sale-leaseback of the Wellesley office in the U.S., and fair value changes in management's ownership of MFS shares; partially offset by the increase in underlying net income.
First Quarter 2023
Underlying net income of $895 million increased $175 million or 24%, driven by:
•Wealth & asset management down $11 million: Lower fee-based earnings in MFS, Canada, and Asia, reflecting equity market declines, largely offset by an increase in investment income driven by higher volumes and yields.
•Group - Health & Protection up $180 million: Strong performance including premium growth, improved disability in Canada and the U.S., strong medical stop-loss margins, and improved U.S. mortality. DentaQuest results also contributed to the increase.
•Individual - Protection up $42 million: Higher premiums reflecting good sales momentum during the past year, and improved mortality in Asia.
•Corporate Support & other $(36) million increased net loss: Higher operating expenses including long-term incentive compensation and IFRS 17 project spend, as well as an increase in debt financing costs.
•Higher investment income reflecting an increase in realized gains from surplus assets and net interest income from higher rates.
Reported net income of $806 million increased $141 million or 21%, driven by the increase in underlying net income and gain on the sale of the sponsored markets business in Canada, partially offset by market-related impacts, and DentaQuest integration and SLC Management acquisition-related costs.
92 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
M. Non-IFRS Financial Measures
1. Common Shareholders' View of Reported Net Income
The following table provides the reconciliation of the Drivers of Earnings ("DOE") analysis to the Statement of Operations total net income. The DOE analysis provides additional detail on the sources of earnings, primarily for protection and health businesses, and explains the actual results compared to the longer term expectations. The underlying DOE and reported DOE are both presented on a common shareholders' basis by removing the allocations to participating policyholders.
($ millions)
2024
Statement of Operations
Underlying DOE(1)
Non-underlying adjustments(1)
Common Shareholders' Reported DOE(2)(3)
Adjustment for:
Reported (per IFRS)
Par(2)
Net(3)
Net insurance service result
2,996
—
2,996
243
(148)
3,091
Net investment result
1,677
(310)
1,367
(97)
664
1,934
ACMA(3)
86
86
—
(86)
Fee Income:
Asset Management
1,762
250
2,012
(2,012)
Other fee income
321
—
321
(18)
8,278
8,581
Fee income
8,581
Other expenses
(1,925)
(701)
(2,626)
—
(6,641)
(9,267)
Income before taxes
4,831
(675)
4,156
128
55
4,339
Income tax (expense) benefit
(834)
(120)
(954)
(86)
—
(1,040)
Total net income
3,997
(795)
3,202
42
55
3,299
Allocated to Participating and NCI(4)
(61)
(12)
(73)
(42)
(55)
(170)
Dividends and Distributions(5)
(80)
—
(80)
—
—
(80)
Underlying net income(1)
3,856
Reported net income - Common shareholders
(807)
3,049
—
—
3,049
($ millions)
2023
Statement of Operations
Underlying DOE(1)
Non-underlying adjustments(1)
Common Shareholders' Reported DOE(2)(3)
Adjustment for:
Reported (per IFRS)
Par(2)
Net(3)
Net insurance service result
2,979
(29)
2,950
149
(262)
2,837
Net investment result
1,710
(682)
1,028
94
517
1,639
ACMA(3)
53
53
—
(53)
Fee income:
Asset Management
1,677
(270)
1,407
(1,407)
Other fee income
247
12
259
(15)
7,588
7,832
Fee income
7,832
Other expenses
(1,928)
(167)
(2,095)
—
(6,283)
(8,378)
Income before taxes
4,685
(1,083)
3,602
228
100
3,930
Income tax (expense) benefit
(811)
404
(407)
(50)
(4)
(461)
Total net income
3,874
(679)
3,195
178
96
3,469
Allocated to Participating and NCI(4)
(67)
37
(30)
(178)
(96)
(304)
Dividends and Distributions(5)
(79)
—
(79)
—
—
(79)
Underlying net income(1)
3,728
Reported net income - Common shareholders
(642)
3,086
—
—
3,086
(1)For a breakdown of non-underlying adjustments made to arrive at underlying net income as well as the underlying DOE analysis, see the heading "Underlying Net Income and Underlying EPS" below.
(2)Removes the components attributable to the participating policyholders.
(3)Certain amounts within the Drivers of Earnings are presented on a net basis to reflect how the business is managed, compared to a gross basis in the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more details, refer to "Drivers of Earnings" in section 3 - Additional Non-IFRS Financial Measures. For example, in this document, the reported net income impact of ACMA is shown in aggregate for Net insurance service result and Net investment result, and excludes amounts attributable to participating policyholders and includes non-liability impacts. In contrast, Note 10.B.v of the 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements shows the pre-tax net income impacts of method and assumption changes in aggregate, and CSM Impacts include amounts attributable to participating policyholders.
(4)Allocated to equity in the participating account and attributable to non-controlling interests.
(5)Dividends on preferred shares and distributions on other equity instruments.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 93
2. Underlying Net Income and Underlying EPS
Underlying net income is a non-IFRS financial measure that assists in understanding Sun Life's business performance by making certain adjustments to IFRS income. Underlying net income, along with common shareholders’ net income (Reported net income), is used as a basis for management planning, and is also a key measure in our employee incentive compensation programs. This measure reflects management's view of the underlying business performance of the company and long-term earnings potential. For example, due to the longer term nature of our individual protection businesses, market movements related to interest rates, equity markets and investment properties can have a significant impact on reported net income in the reporting period. However, these impacts are not necessarily realized, and may never be realized, if markets move in the opposite direction in subsequent periods or in the case of interest rates, the fixed income investment is held to maturity.
Underlying net income removes the impact of the following items from reported net income:
•Market-related impacts reflecting the after-tax difference in actual versus expected market movements, including:
i)Net interest impact from risk-free rate, credit spread, swap spread movements, and other impacts, reflecting accounting mismatches between assets and liabilities:
a.Differences arising from fair value changes(1) of fixed income assets (including derivatives) measured at FVTPL supporting insurance contracts, compared to fair value changes of the liabilities(2);
b.Fair value changes of fixed income assets (including derivatives) measured at FVTPL supporting our investment contract liability and surplus portfolios(3); and
c.Tax-exempt investment(4) income above or below expected long-term tax savings relating to our Canadian multi-national insurance operations.
ii)Non-fixed income investments where the weighted average expected return is approximately 2% per quarter, including:
a.Equity investments (including derivatives) supporting insurance contracts and surplus portfolios; and
b.Investment properties supporting insurance contracts and surplus portfolios.
•ACMA – captures the impact of method and assumption changes, and management actions on insurance and reinsurance contracts.
•Other adjustments:
i)Management’s ownership of MFS shares – this adjustment removes the change in fair value and other activity related to MFS common shares owned by management.
ii)Acquisition, integration, and restructuring – expense and income related to acquisition or disposal of a business. Also includes expenses related to restructuring activities.
iii)Intangible asset amortization – removes the amortization expense associated with finite life intangible assets arising from acquisitions or business combinations excluding amortization of software and distribution agreements.
iv)Other – represents items that are unusual or exceptional in nature which management believes are not representative of the long-term performance of the Company.
Underlying EPS (diluted). This measure is used in comparing the profitability across multiple periods and is calculated by dividing underlying net income by weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted EPS, excluding the dilutive impact of convertible instruments. For additional information about the underlying net income, see above. For additional information about the composition of the EPS, please refer to Note 25 of our Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2024. For additional information about the SLEECS, please refer to Note 12 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
(1)For fixed income assets, Underlying Net Income includes credit experience from rating changes on assets measured at FVTPL, and the ECL impact for assets measured at FVOCI.
(2)Underlying net income is based on observable discount curves and exchange rates at the beginning of the period.
(3)Underlying net income for earnings on surplus includes realized gains (losses) on fixed income assets classified as FVOCI.
(4)Q4'24 balances are isolated in Other within Other adjustments.
94 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The following table sets out the post-tax amounts that were excluded from our underlying net income (loss) and underlying EPS and provides a reconciliation to our reported net income and EPS based on IFRS.
Reconciliations of Select Net Income Measures
($ millions, after-tax)
2024
2023
Underlying net income
3,856
3,728
Market-related impacts
Equity market impacts
25
(13)
Interest rate impacts(1)
(60)
(14)
Impacts of changes in the fair value of investment properties (real estate experience)
(338)
(427)
Add: Market-related impacts
(373)
(454)
Add: Assumption changes and management actions
56
36
Other adjustments
Management's ownership of MFS shares
(22)
12
Acquisition, integration and restructuring(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
140
(155)
Intangible asset amortization(8)
(332)
(132)
Other(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)
(276)
51
Add: Total of other adjustments
(490)
(224)
Reported net income - Common shareholders
3,049
3,086
Underlying EPS (diluted) ($)
6.66
6.36
Add: Market-related impacts ($)
(0.65)
(0.78)
Assumption changes and management actions ($)
0.10
0.06
Management's ownership of MFS shares ($)
(0.04)
0.02
Acquisition, integration and restructuring ($)
0.24
(0.26)
Intangible asset amortization ($)
(0.57)
(0.23)
Other ($)
(0.48)
0.09
Reported EPS (diluted) ($)
5.26
5.26
(1)Our results are sensitive to long term interest rates given the nature of our business and to non-parallel yield curve movements (for example flattening, inversion, steepening, etc.).
(2)Amounts relate to acquisition costs for our SLC Management affiliates, BentallGreenOak, InfraRed Capital Partners, Crescent Capital Group LP and Advisors Asset Management, Inc, which include the unwinding of the discount for Other financial liabilities of $13 million in 2024 (2023 - $86 million).
(3)Primarily reflects a decrease of $334 million in estimated future payments for options to purchase the remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates in 2024 (2023 - an increase of $42 million). For additional information, refer to Note 5 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)Includes integration costs associated with DentaQuest, acquired on June 1, 2022.
(5)Includes a $65 million gain on the sale of the sponsored markets business in Canada in Q1'23 and a $19 million gain on the sale of Sun Life UK in Q2'23.
(6)To meet regulatory obligations, in Q1'24, we sold 6.3% of our ownership interest in ABSLAMC, generating a gain of $84 million. As a result of the transaction, our ownership interest in ABSLAMC was reduced from 36.5% to 30.2% for gross proceeds of $136 million. Subsequently in Q2'24, we sold an additional 0.2% of our ownership interest.
(7)Q2'24 includes a restructuring charge of $108 million in the Corporate business group.
(8)Includes an impairment charge of $186 million on an intangible asset related to bancassurance in Vietnam reflecting updates resulting from changes in regulatory and macro-economic factors in Q4'24.
(9)On December 27, 2023, Bermuda enacted its Corporate Income Tax Act 2023, which will apply a 15% income tax beginning on January 1, 2025 ("Bermuda Corporate Income Tax Change"). The enacted legislation provides an economic transition adjustment that aligns an entity’s starting point for the tax regime more closely with its economic position prior to the application of the Corporate Income Tax 2023. The benefit of this economic transition adjustment was recognized in 2023. As a result, reported net income increased by $51 million in 2023, reflected in Other adjustments.
(10)Includes the early termination of a distribution agreement in Asset Management in Q1'24.
(11)Includes a Pillar Two global minimum tax adjustment in Q2'24. For additional information, refer to Note 19 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements and section D - Profitability in this document.
(12)Includes a non-recurring provision in U.S. Dental in Q4'24.
(13)Includes an adjustment for lower tax exempt investment income of $234 million in the Corporate business group in Q4'24.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 95
The following table shows the pre-tax amount of underlying net income adjustments:
($ millions)
2024
2023
Underlying net income (after-tax)
3,856
3,728
Underlying net income adjustments (pre-tax):
Add: Market-related impacts
(428)
(726)
Assumption changes and management actions(1)
86
53
Other adjustments
(345)
(373)
Total underlying net income adjustments (pre-tax)
(687)
(1,046)
Add: Taxes related to underlying net income adjustments
(120)
404
Reported net income - Common shareholders (after-tax)
3,049
3,086
(1)In this document, the reported net income impact of ACMA excludes amounts attributable to participating policyholders and includes non-liability impacts. In contrast, Note 10.B.v of the 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements shows the pre-tax net income impacts of method and assumption changes in aggregate, and CSM Impacts include amounts attributable to participating policyholders.
Taxes related to underlying net income adjustments may vary from the expected effective tax rate range reflecting the mix of business based on the Company's international operations and other tax-related adjustments.
3. Additional Non-IFRS Financial Measures
Management also uses the following non-IFRS financial measures:
After-tax profit margin for U.S. Group Benefits. This ratio expresses U.S. Group Benefits underlying net income as a percentage of net premiums. It assists in explaining our results from period to period and measures profitability. This ratio is calculated by dividing underlying net income (loss) by net premiums for the trailing four quarters. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Assets under administration (in SLC Management). AUA represents Client assets for which Sun Life provides administrative services. In Asset Management, AUA includes assets distributed by SLC Management's affiliate, Advisors Asset Management, Inc. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Assets under management. AUM is a non-IFRS financial measure that indicates the size of our Company's assets across asset management, wealth, and insurance. There is no standardized financial measure under IFRS. In addition to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, which are the balance of General funds and Segregated funds on our Statements of Financial Position, AUM also includes Third-party AUM and Consolidation adjustments. "Consolidation adjustments" is presented separately as consolidation adjustments apply to all components of total AUM.
AUM not yet earning fees. This measure represents the committed uninvested capital portion of total AUM not currently earning management fees. The amount depends on the specific terms and conditions of each fund. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Capital raising. This measure consists of increases in SLC Management's commitments from fund raising activities for all real estate, infrastructure and alternative credit Clients excluding leverage. Investment-grade fixed income capital raising consists of sales made to new Clients. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Cash and other liquid assets. This measure is comprised of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and publicly traded securities, net of loans related to acquisitions and short-term loans that are held at SLF Inc. (the ultimate parent company), and its wholly owned holding companies. This measure is a key consideration of available funds for capital re-deployment to support business growth.
($ millions)
As at December 31, 2024
As at December 31, 2023
Cash and other liquid assets (held at SLF Inc. and its wholly owned holding companies):
Cash, cash equivalents & short-term securities
479
712
Debt securities(1)
780
1,228
Equity securities(2)
112
102
Sub-total
1,371
2,042
Less: Loans related to acquisitions and short-term loans(3) (held at SLF Inc. and its wholly owned holding companies)
(17)
(411)
Cash and other liquid assets (held at SLF Inc. and its wholly owned holding companies)
1,354
1,631
(1)Includes publicly traded bonds.
(2)Includes ETF Investments.
(3)Includes drawdowns from credit facilities to manage timing of cash flows.
Constant currency. We remove the impacts of foreign exchange translation from certain IFRS and non-IFRS measures to assist in comparing our results from period to period. The impacts of foreign exchange translation is approximated by using the foreign exchange rates in effect during the comparative period, using the average or period end foreign exchange rates, as appropriate.
96 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
CSM Movement Analysis includes certain non-IFRS financial measures, detailed below, and also presents certain measures on a net basis to reflect how the business is managed, compared to a gross basis in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Examples include i) The impacts of insurance contracts issued is presented net of reinsurance; ii) Impact of new business is presented net of acquisition expense gain/loss; and iii) Certain methodology changes are presented as an impact of change in assumptions, whereas the Consolidated Financial Statement presentation is a contract modification.
•Organic CSM Movement is comprised of the Impact of new insurance business, Expected movements from asset returns & locked-in rates, Insurance experience gains/losses, and CSM recognized for services provided.
•Impact of new insurance business on CSM, also referred to as "new business CSM", represents growth from sales activity in the period, including individual protection sales (excluding joint ventures), and defined benefit solutions and segregated fund wealth sales in Canada. New business CSM is presented net of acquisition expense gain/loss.
•Expected movements from asset returns & locked-in rates applies to variable fee approach ("VFA") and general measurement approach ("GMA") contracts. For VFA contracts, this component of the CSM movement analysis is comprised of two factors: (i) the expected return on underlying assets and (ii) the measurement of financial guarantees. The difference between actual and expected results are reported as the impact of markets. For GMA contracts, this component of the CSM includes the accretion of the CSM balance at locked-in rates, which refer to the term structure associated with locked-in discount rates, set when the insurance contract was sold or on transition to IFRS 17. Average locked-in rates increase with the passage of time on in-force business and new business added at current rates.
•Impact of markets & other includes the difference between actual and expected movement for VFA contracts for: (i) the return on underlying assets and (ii) the measurement of financial guarantees. Also includes other amounts excluded from Organic CSM Movement.
•Insurance experience gains/losses represents the current period impacts of insurance experience, resulting in a change in future cash flows that adjust CSM.
•Impact of change in assumptions represents the future period impacts of changes in fulfilment cash flows that adjust CSM.
•CSM market sensitivities. CSM market sensitivities are non-IFRS financial measures for which there are no directly comparable measures under IFRS so it is not possible to provide a reconciliation of these amounts to the most directly comparable IFRS measures.
Deployment. This measure represents the amount of capital that has been invested in the period, including leverage where applicable. Deployment also includes capital committed in infrastructure deals to be invested in specific assets. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Drivers of Earnings. The Drivers of Earnings ("DOE") analysis provides additional detail on the sources of earnings, primarily for protection and health businesses, and explains the actual results compared to the longer term expectations. The DOE is presented on a reported and underlying common shareholders' basis. Within the net insurance service result, the underlying DOE provides detail on expected insurance earnings, impact of new insurance business and experience gains (losses). Within the net investment result, the underlying DOE provides detail on expected investment earnings, credit experience, earnings on surplus, and joint ventures & other. For more information, refer to the headings "Underlying net income and Underlying EPS", "Earnings on surplus", "Notable items attributable to reported and underlying net income", in this document.
Certain amounts in the DOE are presented on a net basis to reflect how the business is managed, compared to a gross basis in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Examples include: i) Net investment result and Other expenses of the Asset Management operating segment are combined with Fee Income to report the net contribution to earnings; ii) Income for fee-based businesses is reported net of the associated expenses; iii) Carried interest in SLC Management within Fee Income excludes the carried interest that Sun Life does not participate in economically, and nets the non-controlling interest portion of the carried interest against fee income and expenses of consolidated funds; iv) Net investment results include assets returns net of the crediting rate for investment contract liabilities and the unwinding of and changes in the discount rate for insurance contract liabilities; v) Earnings on surplus reflects net spread earned from investment strategies; vi) Earnings attributable to the participating account are excluded; and vii) Assumption changes and management actions combines the amounts included in Net insurance service result and Net investment result.
Earnings on Surplus. This component of the Drivers of Earnings represents the net income earned on a company’s surplus funds. Earnings on Surplus is comprised of realized gains on fair value through other comprehensive income assets, as well as net investment returns on surplus, such as investment income, gains (losses) on seed investments and investment properties mark-to-market, and also includes impacts from derivatives, currency and other items.
Experience-related items attributable to reported net income and underlying net income. These notable items attributable to reported net income and underlying net income are components of the Drivers of Earnings represents gains and losses that are due to differences between the actual results during the reporting period and management’s estimate of the expected longer-term returns on assets and liabilities (i.e. expected insurance earnings and expected investment earnings) at the start of the reporting period.
Fee earning AUM. FE AUM consists of assets managed by SLC Management, which are beneficially owned by Clients, on which we earn management fees for providing investment management, property management or advisory-related services. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Fee-related earnings and Operating income. Fee-related earnings represent profitability of SLC Management's fee-related portfolios, and is calculated as Fee-related revenue less Fee-related expenses. Operating income represents profit realized from our business operations, and is calculated as the sum of Fee-related earnings, Investment income (loss) and performance fees, and Interest and other. Fee-related revenue represents all fee income, with the exception of performance fees, generated from third-party investors. Fee-related expenses represent all expenses directly related to generating fee revenue from third-party investors. Investment income (loss) and performance fees represent total income or loss from our seed investments, net of the related expenses. Interest and other represents performance fee compensation, our net interest income or expense and income from managing the General Account assets.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 97
Fee-related earnings and Operating income are non-IFRS financial measures within SLC Management's Supplemental Income Statement, which enhances the comparability of SLC Management's results with publicly traded alternative asset managers. For more details, see our Supplementary Financial Information package for the quarter.
The following table provides a reconciliation from Fee-related earnings and Operating income to SLC Management's Fee income and Total expenses based on IFRS.
SLC Management
($ millions)
2024
2023
Fee income (per IFRS)
1,938
1,640
Less: Non-fee-related revenue adjustments(1)(2)
700
444
Fee-related revenue
1,238
1,196
Total expenses (per IFRS)
1,480
1,603
Less: Non-fee-related expense adjustments(2)(3)
527
697
Fee-related expenses
953
906
Fee-related earnings
285
290
Add: Investment income (loss) and performance fees(4)
112
102
Add: Interest and other(5)
(112)
(110)
Operating income
285
282
(1)Includes Interest and other - fee income, Investment income (loss) and performance fees - fee income, and Other - fee income.
(2)Excludes the income and related expenses for certain property management agreements to provide more accurate metrics on our fee-related business.
(3)Includes Interest and other, Placement fees - other, Amortization of intangibles, Acquisition, integration and restructuring, and Other - expenses.
(4)Investment income (loss) and performance fee in SLC Management's Supplemental Income Statement relates to the underlying results of our seed investments. As such, we have excluded non-underlying market-related impacts as well as the gains or losses of certain non-seed hedges that are reported under Net investment income (loss) under IFRS. The reconciliation is as follows (amounts have been adjusted for rounding):
($ millions)
2024
2023
Net investment income (loss) (per IFRS)
138
55
Less: Market-related impacts and Other - Investment income (loss)
50
(14)
Add: Investment income (loss) and performance fees - fee income
24
33
Investment income (loss) and performance fees
112
102
(5)Includes Interest and other reported under Fee income under IFRS, net of Interest and other reported under Total expenses under IFRS.
Financial leverage ratio. This ratio is an indicator of the Company's balance sheet strength measured by its proportion of capital qualifying debt in accordance with OSFI guidelines. This is calculated as the ratio of total debt plus preferred shares to total capital including the contractual service margin net of taxes, where debt consists of all capital-qualifying debt securities. Capital-qualifying debt securities consist of subordinated debt and innovative capital instruments. The CSM is included net of taxes because debts are repaid and serviced from available after-tax funds.
Impacts of foreign exchange translation. To assist in comparing our results from period-to-period, the favourable or unfavourable impacts of foreign exchange translation are approximated using the foreign exchange rates, in effect during the comparative period, for several IFRS and Non-IFRS financial measures using the average or period end foreign exchange rates, as appropriate. Items impacting a reporting period, such as Revenue, Expenses, and Reported net income (loss) in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, as well as underlying net income (loss), and sales, are translated into Canadian dollars using average exchange rates for the appropriate daily, monthly, or quarterly period. For Assets and Liabilities in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, as well as the AUM and certain components of the Drivers of Earnings disclosure, period-end rates are used for currency translation purposes.
LICAT market sensitivities. LICAT market sensitivities are non-IFRS financial measures for which there are no directly comparable measures under IFRS so it is not possible to provide a reconciliation of these amounts to the most directly comparable IFRS measures.
Organic capital generation. This supplementary financial measure provides a view of the Company’s ability to generate excess capital under the normal course of business, excluding non-recurring items; where excess capital is defined as LICAT Available Capital and Surplus Allowance above LICAT Base Solvency Buffer at target ratio, as defined and calculated under OSFI-mandated guideline. This amount is determined as follows: underlying net income and organic CSM movement net of shareholder dividends and change in base solvency buffer for new business and aging of in-force. This amount excludes non-recurring impacts to available capital or base solvency buffer from markets, assumption changes, management actions, and other non-underlying items.
Pre-tax fee related earnings margin. This ratio is a measure of SLC Management's profitability in relation to funds that earn recurring fee revenues, while excluding investment income and performance fees. The ratio is calculated by dividing fee-related earnings by fee-related revenues and is based on the last twelve months. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Pre-tax net operating margin. This ratio is a measure of the profitability and there is no directly comparable IFRS measure. For MFS, this ratio is calculated by excluding management's ownership of MFS shares and certain commission expenses that are offsetting. These commission expenses are excluded in order to neutralize the impact these items have on the pre-tax net operating margin and have no impact on the profitability of MFS. For SLC Management, the ratio is calculated by dividing the total operating income by fee-related revenue plus investment Income (loss) and performance fees, and is based on the last twelve months.
98 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The following table provides a reconciliation to calculate MFS' pre-tax net operating margin:
MFS
(US$ millions)
2024
2023
Revenue
Fee income (per IFRS)
3,370
3,196
Less: Commissions
399
395
Less: Other(1)
(57)
(53)
Adjusted revenue
3,028
2,854
Expenses
Expenses (per IFRS)
2,391
2,244
Net investment (income)/loss (per IFRS)
(95)
(93)
Less: Management's ownership of MFS shares (net of NCI)(2)
57
34
Compensation-related equity plan adjustments
36
16
Commissions
399
395
Other(1)
(51)
(52)
Adjusted expenses
1,855
1,758
Pre-tax net operating margin
38.7%
38.4%
(1)Other includes accounting basis differences, such as sub-advisory expenses and product allowances.
(2)Excluding non-controlling interest. For more information on Management's ownership of MFS shares, see the heading Underlying Net Income and Underlying EPS.
Return on equity. IFRS does not prescribe the calculation of ROE and therefore a comparable measure under IFRS is not available. To determine reported ROE and underlying ROE, respectively, reported net income (loss) and underlying net income (loss) is divided by the total weighted average common shareholders’ equity for the period. The ROE provides an indication of the overall profitability of the Company. The quarterly ROE is annualized.
Sales and flows. Asset Management gross flows includes funds from retail and institutional Clients; SLC Management gross flows include capital raising, such as uncalled capital commitments and fund leverage. Asset Management net flows consist of gross flows less gross outflows; SLC Management's net flows do not include Client distributions from the sale of underlying assets in closed-end funds. In Canada and in Asia, net sales consist of wealth sales & asset management gross flows less redemptions. In Canada, wealth sales & asset management gross flows consist of sales in Group Retirement Services (excluding retained sales) and Individual Wealth; group - health & protection sales consist of workplace benefits sold by Sun Life Health; and individual - protection sales refer to individual insurance sales. In the U.S., group - health & protection sales consist of sales by Group Benefits and Dental. In Asia, wealth sales & asset management gross flows consist of Hong Kong wealth sales & asset management gross flows, Philippines mutual fund sales, wealth sales & asset management gross flows by our India and China joint ventures and associates, and Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited's equity and fixed income mutual fund sales based on our proportionate equity interest, including sales as reported by our bank distribution partners; individual - protection sales consist of the individual insurance sales, by our subsidiaries and joint ventures and associates, based on our proportionate equity interest, in the Philippines, Indonesia, India, China, Malaysia, Vietnam, International, Hong Kong and Singapore. Asia also has group - health & protection sales in the Philippines, Hong Kong and our joint ventures. To provide greater comparability across reporting periods, we exclude the impacts of foreign exchange translation from sales and gross flows. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Third-party AUM. Third-party AUM is composed of retail, institutional, and other third party assets, which includes general fund and segregated fund assets managed by our joint ventures. In Asset Management, third-party AUM includes Client assets for retail and institutional Clients, as well as capital raising, such as uncalled commitments and fund leverage in SLC Management. In Canada, third-party AUM includes Client assets in retail mutual fund products of Sun Life Global Investments. In Asia, third-party AUM includes Client assets in Hong Kong managed fund products, International wealth & asset management products, Philippines mutual and managed fund products, Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited equity and fixed income mutual fund products, Sun Life Everbright Asset Management products and our joint ventures’ general fund and segregated fund assets based on our proportionate equity interest. There is no directly comparable IFRS financial measure.
Total weighted premium income ("TWPI"). This measure consists of 100% renewal premiums, 100% of first year premiums, and 10% of single premiums. In contrast to sales, which only includes premiums from new business, TWPI includes renewal premiums, reflecting the strength of the in-force block and providing a better understanding of both new and existing business. There is no directly comparable IFRS measure.
Underlying dividend payout ratio. This is the ratio of dividends paid per share to diluted underlying EPS for the period. The ratio is utilized during the medium-term capital budgeting process to inform our planned capital initiatives. We target an underlying dividend payout ratio of between 40% and 50% based on underlying EPS. For more information, see Section J - Capital and Liquidity Management in this document.
Underlying effective tax rate. This measure is calculated using the pre-tax underlying net income and the income tax expense associated with it. Our statutory tax rate is normally reduced by various tax benefits, such as lower taxes on income subject to tax in foreign jurisdictions, a range of tax-exempt investment income, and other sustainable tax benefits. Our effective tax rate helps in the analysis of the income tax impacts in the period.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 99
4. Reconciliations of Select Non-IFRS Financial Measures
Underlying Net Income to Reported Net Income Reconciliation - Pre-tax by Business Group
Q4'24
($ millions)
Asset Management
Canada
U.S.
Asia
Corporate
Total
Underlying net income (loss)
360
366
161
175
(97)
965
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(18)
(142)
(74)
27
(14)
(221)
ACMA (pre-tax)
—
(1)
(1)
15
—
13
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(34)
(8)
(143)
(193)
—
(378)
Tax expense (benefit)
18
38
50
(13)
(235)
(142)
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
326
253
(7)
11
(346)
237
Q4'23
Underlying net income (loss)
331
350
253
143
(94)
983
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(11)
(223)
(60)
(142)
—
(436)
ACMA (pre-tax)
—
72
(65)
(1)
—
6
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(39)
(6)
(65)
(8)
—
(118)
Tax expense (benefit)
16
155
38
52
53
314
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
297
348
101
44
(41)
749
2024
($ millions)
Asset Management
Canada
U.S.
Asia
Corporate
Total
Underlying net income (loss)
1,293
1,453
773
701
(364)
3,856
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(25)
(211)
(148)
(47)
3
(428)
ACMA (pre-tax)
—
(47)
181
(52)
4
86
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
263
(33)
(323)
(114)
(138)
(345)
Tax expense (benefit)
(3)
55
73
(59)
(186)
(120)
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
1,528
1,217
556
429
(681)
3,049
2023
Underlying net income (loss)
1,239
1,376
890
600
(377)
3,728
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(61)
(433)
(59)
(156)
(17)
(726)
ACMA (pre-tax)
—
82
(66)
34
3
53
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(172)
90
(272)
(28)
9
(373)
Tax expense (benefit)
61
137
83
61
62
404
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
1,067
1,252
576
511
(320)
3,086
100 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Underlying Net Income to Reported Net Income Reconciliation - Pre-tax by Business Unit - Asset Management
Q4'24
Q4'23
($ millions)
MFS
SLC Management
MFS
SLC Management
Underlying net income (loss)
301
59
261
70
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
—
(18)
—
(11)
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
4
(38)
(7)
(32)
Tax expense (benefit)
(4)
22
(4)
20
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
301
25
250
47
2024
2023
($ millions)
MFS
SLC Management
MFS
SLC Management
Underlying net income (loss)
1,117
176
1,044
195
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
—
(25)
—
(61)
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(4)
267
30
(202)
Tax expense (benefit)
(18)
15
(18)
79
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
1,095
433
1,056
11
Underlying Net Income to Reported Net Income Reconciliation - Pre-tax in U.S. dollars
Q4'24
Q4'23
(US$ millions)
U.S.
MFS
U.S.
MFS
Underlying net income (loss)
115
216
187
191
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(52)
—
(42)
—
ACMA (pre-tax)
—
—
(49)
—
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(103)
3
(47)
(5)
Tax expense (benefit)
39
(3)
28
(3)
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
(1)
216
77
183
2024
2023
(US$ millions)
U.S.
MFS
U.S.
MFS
Underlying net income (loss)
566
817
663
773
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(112)
—
(40)
—
ACMA (pre-tax)
136
—
(48)
—
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(235)
(4)
(200)
22
Tax expense (benefit)
56
(13)
65
(13)
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
411
800
440
782
Underlying Net Income to Reported Net Income Reconciliation - U.S. Group Benefits - Pre-tax in U.S. dollars
The following table sets out the amounts that were excluded from our reported net income (loss) for U.S. Group Benefits, which is used to calculate the trailing four-quarter after-tax profit margin for U.S. Group Benefits.
(US$ millions)
Q4'24
Q3'24
Q2'24
Q1'24
Q4'23
Q3'23
Q2'23
Q1'23
Underlying net income (loss) for U.S. Group Benefits
62
118
124
118
138
96
116
128
Add: Market-related impacts (pre-tax)
(18)
17
(11)
(8)
14
(10)
(6)
4
ACMA (pre-tax)
—
8
—
—
(11)
47
—
—
Other adjustments (pre-tax)
(5)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(9)
(6)
(6)
(5)
Tax expense (benefit)
5
(4)
3
3
1
(6)
2
1
Reported net income (loss) - Common shareholders
44
134
110
106
133
121
106
128
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 101
N. Accounting and Control Matters
We have adopted amended IFRS standards in the current year, which had no material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information, refer to Note 2 in our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
1. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting and actuarial policies are described in Notes 1 and 6 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Management must make judgments involving assumptions and estimates, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain, under these policies. The estimates described below are considered particularly significant to understanding our financial performance. As part of our financial control and reporting, judgments involving assumptions and estimates are reviewed by the independent auditor and by other independent advisors on a periodic basis. Accounting policies requiring estimates are applied consistently in the determination of our financial results.
1.A Insurance Contracts Summary and Methods and Assumptions
Summary
We sell a variety of insurance contracts that include many forms of life, health and critical illness insurance sold to individuals and groups, annuities, and segregated fund products with guarantees. We hold reinsurance contracts that transfer mortality and other risks following internal guidelines.
Insurance contracts with direct participation features are products where investments are managed on behalf of policyholders, and investment returns less a variable fee are passed through to policyholders with the insurance benefits they receive. Insurance contracts with direct participation features are measured using the VFA, and include segregated funds, unit-linked contracts, variable universal life contracts, and most participating insurance contracts. Reinsurance contracts (both issued and held) cannot be measured using the VFA.
Insurance contracts without direct participation features are eligible to use the PAA if the coverage period is one year or less, or if the result of applying the PAA is not expected to be a materially different result than applying the GMA in each reporting period over the life of the contract. Insurance contracts eligible to use the PAA include most group life and health contracts and the associated reinsurance contracts held.
Other insurance contracts are measured using the GMA. This includes most individual life and health insurance contracts and annuities and the associated reinsurance contracts held.
The Consolidated Statements of Financial Position present insurance contracts issued and reinsurance contracts held as both assets and liabilities, depending on whether the portfolio is in an asset or liability position.
For more information about insurance contracts issued and reinsurance contracts held, and Insurance contract liabilities for account of segregated fund holders, see Note 1, Note 10 and Note 21 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Methods and Assumptions
General
A group of insurance contracts is measured as the total of FCF, which is the present value of future cash flows plus the risk adjustment for
non-financial risk, and, for groups measured using the GMA or VFA, the CSM. In measuring the present value of future cash flows, assumptions must be made about mortality and morbidity rates, lapse and other policyholder behaviour ("policyholder behaviour"), expenses and other factors over the life of our products, and the prevailing market view of the cost of financial risk in our products. Many of these assumptions relate to events that are anticipated to occur many years in the future. Assumptions require significant judgment and regular review and, where appropriate, revision.
The RA is the compensation we require for the uncertainty related to non-financial risk in the estimates of future cash flows. This compensation is measured by discounting cash flows from applying margins to the non-financial assumptions used in the estimate of future cash flows.
The CSM represents the unearned profit that will be recognized as insurance contract services are provided.
The methods and assumptions used in the measurement of insurance contracts are reviewed regularly and are subject to external actuarial peer review.
Present Value of Future Cash Flows
Assumptions for non-financial risk variables in the present value of future cash flows are intended to be current, neutral estimates of the expected outcome, as guided by both IFRS and accepted actuarial practice in Canada. The choice of assumptions takes into account current circumstances, past experience data from our own experience or from the industry, the relationship of past to expected future experience, anti-selection, the relationship among assumptions (including those for financial risk variables), and other relevant factors.
Assumptions for financial risk variables in the present value of future cash flows are based on current observable market prices, adjusted to account for differences between the financial risk embedded in our products and those in the corresponding observed market instrument. Where no relevant market instrument is available, we use the best information available as guided by both IFRS and accepted actuarial practice in Canada.
102 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Mortality
Mortality refers to the rates at which death occurs for defined groups of people. Mortality assumptions are generally based on the past five to ten years of experience. Our experience is combined with industry experience or experience from reinsurers where our own experience is insufficient to be statistically valid. Assumed mortality rates for life insurance and annuity contracts include assumptions about future mortality improvement based on recent trends in population mortality and our outlook for future trends.
Morbidity
Morbidity refers to the rate of being unhealthy or disabled and the rates of recovery therefrom. Most of our disability insurance is marketed on a group basis. We offer critical illness policies on an individual basis in Canada and Asia, long-term care on an individual basis in Canada, and medical stop-loss insurance is offered on a group basis in the U.S. In Canada, group morbidity assumptions are based on our five-year average experience, modified to reflect any emerging trend in recovery rates. For Canadian long-term care and critical illness insurance in Canada and Asia, assumptions are developed in collaboration with our reinsurers and are largely based on their experience. In the U.S., our experience is used for both medical stop-loss and disability assumptions, with some consideration of industry or reinsurer experience.
Policyholder Behaviour
Lapse or surrender
Policyholders may allow their policies to lapse prior to the end of the contractual coverage period by choosing not to continue to pay premiums or by surrendering their policy for the cash surrender value. Assumptions for lapse or surrender experience on life insurance are generally based on our five-year average experience. Lapse or surrender rates vary by plan, age at issue, method of premium payment, policy duration and financial risk variables.
Premium payment patterns
For universal life contracts, it is necessary to set assumptions about premium payment patterns. Studies prepared by industry or the actuarial profession are used for products where our experience is insufficient to be statistically valid. Premium payment patterns usually vary by plan, age at issue, method of premium payment, policy duration and financial risk variables.
Expense
Future expenses directly attributable to the fulfilment of our insurance contracts include the costs of premium collection, claims adjudication and processing, actuarial calculations, preparation and mailing of policy statements, and related overhead. Future expense assumptions are mainly based on our recent experience using an internal expense allocation methodology. Inflationary increases assumed in future expenses are based on long-term expectations.
Acquisition expenses directly attributable to portfolios of insurance contracts include the costs of selling, underwriting and issuing insurance contracts. For new insurance contracts measured using the GMA or VFA, actual or estimated directly attributable acquisition expenses are recognized in the initial measurement of the contract. If estimates are used, the difference between estimated and actual acquisition expenses adjusts the CSM when the group of insurance contracts is closed to new contracts.
Current Discount Rates
Current discount rates are used to discount estimates of future cash flows in determining the present value of future cash flows. Current discount rates reflect the time value of money, the characteristics of the cash flows, and the liquidity characteristics of the insurance contracts.
Current discount rates for cash flows that do not vary based on returns on underlying items
Cash flows that do not vary at all based on the returns on any underlying items are discounted at rates that reflect the timing and currency of cash flows and the liquidity characteristics of the insurance contracts.
The timing of cash flows is reflected by constructing a discount curve, so that each cash flow is discounted consistent with the timing of the cash flow. In constructing the discount curve, a portion is based on market information (the observable period) and beyond that period, the discount rates are estimated (the unobservable period). The observable period, which varies by currency, is the time period where information on risk-free interest rates is deep and liquid. In the unobservable period, risk-free rates are interpolated between the last observable point and an ultimate risk-free rate at year 70. The ultimate risk-free rate is estimated using historical averages as guided by both IFRS and accepted actuarial practice in Canada.
The currency of cash flows is reflected by using different discount curves for different currencies.
Liquidity is reflected by adding a liquidity premium to risk-free discount rates that is consistent with the liquidity characteristics of the insurance contracts. The liquidity premium in the observable period is based on the liquidity premium on assets with similar liquidity characteristics, which is estimated from the spread inherent in current market yields less a deduction for expected and unexpected credit losses. The deduction for expected and unexpected credit losses is estimated using historical rating agency data and current market conditions, and varies by asset type, quality, and duration. The liquidity premium in the unobservable period is interpolated between the last observable liquidity premium and an ultimate liquidity premium (at year 70) specific to liquid or illiquid contracts as guided by both IFRS and accepted actuarial practice in Canada. See Note 10.A in the 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for further details, which provides a weighted average summary of the discount curves used to present value cash flows for all major products that do not vary based on the returns on underlying items.
Current discount rates for cash flows that vary with returns on underlying items
Discount rates for cash flows that vary directly with returns on underlying items reflect that variability. For the portion of cash flows that is a pass through of returns on underlying items to policyholders, the discount rate is such that the present value of cash flows equals the portion of the underlying items that is passed through to policyholders. For cash flows that vary, but not directly, with underlying items (e.g., financial guarantees), scenario testing may be necessary. If so, discount rates used in the scenario projections are scenario-specific and based on the projected risk-free rates in the scenario plus liquidity premiums consistent with the liquidity characteristics of the contracts being measured.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 103
Scenario Testing
Scenario testing may be required when the relationship between cash flows and financial risk variables is non-linear, or where there are complex interdependencies among cash flows. In scenario testing of financial risk variables, future cash flows are projected for each scenario path and discounted at the scenario-specific discount rates, resulting in a present value of future cash flows for each scenario. The provision for the projected cash flows is the average of the scenario-specific values. Assumptions for non-financial risk variables are the best estimate assumptions consistent with the scenario.
Scenarios are consistent with the current market environment. Our Economic Scenario Generator calibration process produces integrated stochastic scenarios of financial risk variables (e.g., risk-free interest rates, bond fund returns, equity returns) with parameters calibrated to replicate observable market prices of financial instruments available in the market. Adjustments are made when the insurance contracts being measured are illiquid but the financial instruments to which the scenarios are calibrated to are liquid.
Risk Adjustment for Non-Financial Risk
The RA for insurance contracts issued is the compensation we require for bearing uncertainty about the amount and timing of the cash flows that arises from non-financial risk. This amount is measured as the present value of the difference between estimated future cash flows with a margin applied to non-financial assumptions and estimated future cash flows without this adjustment. Margins generally range from 5% to 20% depending on the uncertainty in the determination of the assumption. The level of uncertainty, and hence the margin chosen, varies by assumption and by line of business and other factors. Considerations that would generally lead to a choice of margin at the higher end of the range are as follows:
•The statistical credibility of our experience is too low to be the primary source of data for choosing the assumption;
•Future experience is difficult to estimate;
•The cohort of risks lacks homogeneity;
•Operational risks adversely impact the ability to estimate the assumption; or
•Past experience may not be representative of future experience and the experience may deteriorate.
Margins are generally stable over time and are revised only to reflect changes in the level of uncertainty in the assumptions. Our margins tend to be at mid-range.
The RA for reinsurance contracts held represents the amount of risk transferred to the reinsurer. This is measured as the difference between the RA on the underlying insurance contracts without reinsurance and what the RA on the underlying insurance contracts would be with reinsurance. The RA for reinsurance contracts held increases the asset or reduces the liability for reinsurance contracts held.
The RA for insurance contracts corresponds to a confidence level of approximately 85-90% overall.
Contractual Service Margin
The initial and subsequent measurement of CSM is described in Note 1 in our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Additional detail about certain components of the measurement of CSM is provided below.
Interest accretion
For insurance contracts measured using the GMA, locked-in discount rates are used to accrete interest on the CSM. The locked-in discount rate for a group of insurance contracts is the weighted average of the current discount rates at initial recognition of the contracts in the group.
For insurance contracts measured using the VFA, there is no accretion of interest. Rather, the CSM is adjusted by the change in our share of the fair value of underlying items.
Changes in FCF relating to future service
For insurance contracts measured using the GMA, locked-in discount rates are used to measure changes in FCF relating to future service. Changes in FCF relating to future service reflect changes in non-financial assumptions but not changes in assumptions related to financial risk.
For insurance contracts measured using the VFA, current discount rates are used to measure the change in FCF relating to future service. Changes in FCF relating to future service reflect both changes in non-financial assumptions and changes in assumptions related to financial risk.
Changes in FCF relating to future service include (Liability for Remaining Coverage only):
•All changes related to investment component payments (including current period payments);
•Changes arising from changes in assumptions used to derive the present value of future cash flows - limited to non-financial assumptions for insurance contracts measured using the GMA;
•Changes in future cash flows arising from claims in the current period; and
•For insurance contracts measured using the GMA, changes related to discretionary cash flows on some universal life and adjustable products. Discretionary cash flows are cash flows outside the guaranteed payments to the policyholder, and are described as a spread on earned rates (in the case of some universal life contracts) and in the policy on criteria for changes to adjustable policies for adjustable policies.
CSM recognized for services provided
The amount of CSM recognized as insurance revenue in each period to reflect the insurance contract services provided for a group of contracts in the period is determined by:
•Identifying the total coverage units in the group (for services in current and future periods) – based on the quantity of insurance contract services;
•Allocating the CSM at the end of the period equally to each coverage unit in the current period and expected to be provided in the future (i.e., coverage units "unitize" the services provided); then
104 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
•Recognizing in insurance revenue the amount allocated to coverage units provided in the period.
Total coverage units for services expected to be provided in future periods is the present value of projected coverage units. The present value is measured using locked-in discount rates for groups measured using the GMA and current discount rates for groups measured using the VFA.
The coverage unit for a group is based on the nature of the insurance contract services provided. Insurance contract services comprise services for providing insurance coverage and, for some contracts, investment-return or investment-related services. It does not include services related to performing functions such as claims adjudication. Where more than one type of service is provided to insurance contracts in a group, the coverage unit reflects the primary service provided.
For insurance contracts measured using the VFA, coverage units are based on the policyholder's account value or the policyholders' share of the fair value of underlying items. For insurance contracts measured using the GMA, coverage units are based on the expected claim amount (excluding any investment component) for life and health insurance contracts, and the payment due in a period for annuity contracts.
For reinsurance contracts held, the amount of CSM recognized reflects the services received in the period.
Sensitivities to Insurance Methods and Assumptions
In addition to the insurance risks factors and risk management governance and controls described in section K - Risk Management in this document and the Risk Factors section of the 2024 AIF, we also note that on adoption of IFRS 17 and 9, the tables below include sensitivities of contractual service margins to insurance and other non-financial assumption risks.
The following table sets out the estimated immediate impact on, or sensitivity of, the CSM and net income to certain instantaneous changes in the insurance and other non-financial assumptions used in the calculation of our insurance contract liabilities, based on a starting point and business mix as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. These sensitivities are calculated independently for each risk factor, generally assuming that all other risk variables stay constant. The estimates are illustrative and different starting points for best estimate assumptions, CSM balances and business mix will result in different estimated sensitivities. These sensitivities represent the Company's estimate of changes in best estimate assumptions that are reasonably likely based on the Company's and/or the industry's historical experience and industry standards and best practices as at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
The impact on CSM is attributable to insurance contracts measured under the GMA and VFA. For insurance contracts measured under the GMA, the impact flows through the CSM at locked-in discount rates. For insurance contracts measured under the VFA, the impact flows through the CSM at current discount rates.
The impact on net income is attributable to any portion of the sensitivities for insurance contracts measured under the GMA and VFA that cannot be absorbed by CSM, the full impact for insurance contracts measured under the PAA, and the difference in impact between locked-in and current discount rates for insurance contracts measured under the GMA. If current discount rates are higher than locked-in rates, this generally results in a favourable impact to net income from contracts measured under the GMA.
($ millions)
As at December 31, 2024
As at December 31, 2023
Sensitivity(1)
Potential impact on CSM (pre-tax)
Potential impact on
net income/equity (after-tax)
Potential impact on CSM (pre-tax)
Potential impact on
net income/equity (after-tax)
Policyholder Behaviour (10% increase/decrease, where adverse)
(800)
(25)
(950)
100
Life Mortality rates (2% increase)
25
(75)
(75)
(25)
Annuity Mortality rates (2% decrease)
(175)
—
(175)
—
Morbidity rates (5% incidence increase and 5% termination decrease)
(125)
(225)
(100)
(175)
Expenses (5% increase)
(150)
(25)
(175)
—
(1) Sensitivities to insurance assumptions refer to insurance contracts issued net of reinsurance contracts held. Net income and CSM sensitivities have been rounded in increments of $25 million. The sensitivities exclude the impacts on the income from our joint ventures and associates in China and India, which we account for on an equity basis.
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
Debt securities, equity securities, most mortgages and loans and certain other invested assets are measured FVTPL or FVOCI and are recorded at fair value in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Changes in fair value of assets measured FVTPL, and realized gains and losses on sale of FVTPL assets are recognized in income. Changes in fair value of FVOCI assets are recorded in OCI. For foreign currency translation, exchange differences calculated on the amortized cost of FVOCI assets are recognized in income and other changes in the carrying amount are recognized in OCI. Net impairment losses and realized gains and losses on sale of FVOCI assets (except for FVOCI equity securities as they remain in OCI) are reclassified from OCI to income.
The fair value of government and corporate debt securities is primarily determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar securities, where available. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value is determined using market standard valuation methodologies, which include a discounted cash flow method, consensus pricing from various broker dealers that are typically the market makers, or other similar techniques. The assumptions and valuation inputs in applying these market standard valuation methodologies are determined primarily using observable market inputs, which include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades of identical or similar instruments, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, bid prices, and reference data including market research publications. In limited circumstances, non-binding broker quotes are used.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 105
The fair value of asset-backed securities is primarily determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar securities, where available, or valuation methodologies and valuation inputs similar to those used for government and corporate debt securities. Additional valuation inputs include structural characteristics of the securities, and the underlying collateral performance, such as prepayment speeds and delinquencies. Expected prepayment speeds are based primarily on those previously experienced in the market at projected future interest rate levels. In limited circumstances where there is a lack of sufficient observable market data to value the securities, non-binding broker quotes are used.
The fair value of equity securities is determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities or similar securities. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value is determined using equity valuation models, which include a discounted cash flow method and other techniques that involve benchmark comparison. Valuation inputs primarily include projected future operating cash flows and earnings, dividends, market discount rates, and earnings multiples of comparable companies. Where equity securities are less frequently traded, the most recent exchange-quoted pricing is used to determine fair value.
The fair value of mortgages and loans is determined by discounting the expected future contractual cash flows using a current market interest rate applicable to financial instruments with a similar yield, credit quality, and maturity characteristics. Valuation inputs typically include benchmark yields and risk-adjusted spreads from current internal lending activities or loan issuances. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2022, valuation inputs also include external lending activities or loan issuances from both public and private markets, enhancing the market observability of inputs. The risk-adjusted spreads are determined based on the borrower’s credit and liquidity, as well as term and other loan-specific features.
The fair value of other financial liabilities is determined by using the discounted cash flow methodology at the incremental borrowing rate or the effective interest rate. Other financial liabilities categorized as Level 3 represent the present value of the estimated price we would pay to acquire any remaining outstanding shares upon exercise of a put option and any mandatory income distributions. The fair value of the liabilities is based on the average earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") for the preceding years before the options’ exercise dates and EBITDA multiples in accordance with the put agreements as well as the expected amount of any mandatory income distributions. A change in EBITDA would impact the fair value of other financial liabilities and our net income (loss).
Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in income unless the derivative is part of a qualifying hedging relationship for accounting purposes. The fair value of derivative financial instruments depends upon derivative types. The fair value of exchange-traded futures and options is determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets, while the fair value of OTC derivatives is determined using pricing models, such as a discounted cash flow method or other market standard valuation techniques, with primarily observable market inputs.
Valuation inputs used to price OTC derivatives may include swap interest rate curves, foreign exchange spot and forward rates, index prices, the value of underlying securities, projected dividends, volatility surfaces, and in limited circumstances, counterparty quotes.
The fair value of OTC derivative instruments also includes credit valuation adjustments to reflect the credit risk of both the derivative counterparty and ourselves as well as the impact of contractual factors designed to reduce our credit exposure, such as collateral and legal rights of offset under master netting agreements. Inputs into determining the appropriate credit valuation adjustments are typically obtained from publicly available information and include credit default swap spreads when available, credit spreads derived from specific bond yields, or published cumulative default experience data adjusted for current trends when credit default swap spreads are not available.
The fair value of other financial invested assets consists primarily of limited partnership investments which is based on net asset value ("NAV") provided by management of the limited partnership investments. Based on the unobservable nature of these NAVs, we do not assess whether applying reasonably possible alternative assumptions would have an impact on the fair value of the limited partnership investments.
Investment properties are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in income. The fair value of investment properties is generally determined using property valuation models that are based on expected capitalization rates and models that discount expected future net cash flows at current market interest rates reflective of the characteristics, location, and market of each property. Expected future net cash flows include contractual and projected cash flows and forecasted operating expenses, and take into account interest, rental and occupancy rates derived from market surveys. The estimates of future cash inflows, in addition to expected rental income from current leases, include projected income from future leases based on significant assumptions that are consistent with current market conditions. The future rental rates are estimated based on the location, type and quality of the properties, and take into account market data and projections at the valuation date. The fair values are typically compared to market-based information for reasonability, including recent transactions involving comparable assets. The methodologies and inputs used in these models are in accordance with real estate industry valuation standards. Valuations are prepared externally or internally by professionally accredited real estate appraisers.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term securities are classified as held for trading for the purpose of meeting short-term cash requirements and accounted for at FVTPL due to their short-term nature or because they are frequently repriced to current market rates.
Investments for accounts of segregated fund holders are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in net realized and unrealized gains (losses) within the segregated fund and are not recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of investments for accounts of segregated fund holders is determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets or independent valuation information provided by investment managers. The fair value of direct investments within investments for accounts of segregated fund holders, such as short-term securities and government and corporate debt securities, is determined according to valuation methodologies and inputs described above in the respective asset type sections. The fair value of the secured borrowings from mortgage securitization is based on the methodologies and assumptions as described above for asset-backed securities.
The fair value of investment contracts is measured through the use of prospective discounted cash flow method. For unit-linked contracts, the fair value is equal to the current unit fund value, plus additional non-unit liability amounts on a fair value basis if required. For non-unit-linked contracts, the fair value is equal to the present value of contractual cash flow. The fair value of the investment contract liabilities approximate their carrying values due to the nature of the contracts.
106 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The fair values of these obligations are based on the fair value of the underlying securities, which can include debt or equity securities. The method used to determine fair value is based on the quoted market prices where available in an active market.
The fair value of underlying assets within our CLOs is determined primarily using observable market inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets in active markets and other observable market data.
The fair value of underlying liabilities within our CLOs is determined by discounting expected future contractual cash flows using a current market interest rate applicable to financial instruments with a similar yield, credit quality, maturity characteristics, and structural credit protections. The valuation technique maximizes the use of observable inputs that incorporates comparable securities’ prices and other market intelligence.
The methodologies and assumptions for determining the fair values of investment contract liabilities are included in Note 10.A of the 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
We categorize our assets and liabilities carried at fair value, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as follows:
Level 1: Fair value is based on the unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. The types of assets and liabilities classified as Level 1 generally include cash and cash equivalents, certain U.S. government and agency securities, exchange-traded equity securities, and certain segregated and mutual fund units held for account of segregated fund holders.
Level 2: Fair value is based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities traded in active markets, or prices from valuation techniques that use significant observable inputs, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data through correlation or other means. The types of assets and liabilities classified as Level 2 generally include Canadian federal, provincial and municipal government, other foreign government and corporate debt securities, certain asset-backed securities, OTC derivatives, and certain segregated and mutual fund units held for account of segregated fund holders.
Level 3: Fair value is based on valuation techniques that require one or more significant inputs that are not based on observable market inputs. These unobservable inputs reflect our expectations about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The types of assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 generally include certain corporate bonds, certain other invested assets, and investment properties.
As pricing inputs become more or less observable, assets are transferred between levels in the hierarchy. Total gains and losses in income and OCI are calculated assuming transfers into or out of Level 3 occur at the beginning of the period. For a financial instrument that transfers into Level 3 during the reporting period, the entire change in fair value for the period is included in the Level 3 reconciliation schedule in Note 5 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. For transfers out of Level 3 during the reporting period, the change in fair value for the period is excluded from the Level 3 reconciliation schedule in Note 5 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements. Transfers into Level 3 occur when the inputs used to price the financial instrument lack observable market data and as a result, no longer meet the Level 1 or 2 criteria at the reporting date. Transfers out of Level 3 occur when the pricing inputs become more transparent and satisfy the Level 1 or 2 criteria at the reporting date.
Transfers into and out of Level 3 for financial assets were $624 million and $1,058 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, respectively, (December 31, 2023 - $390 million and $918 million, respectively). The total amount of the net realized/unrealized gains (losses) related to financial instruments transferred out of Level 3 during the period, which were excluded from the Level 3 reconciliation, was a gain of $2 million as at December 31, 2024 (December 31, 2023 - gain of $31 million).
Additional information on the fair value measurement of investments can be found in Note 5 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets of the acquired businesses. Goodwill is carried at original cost less any impairment subsequently incurred. Goodwill is assessed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances occur that may result in the recoverable amount of a cash generating unit ("CGU") falling below its carrying value. A CGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of cash inflows from other groups of assets. The goodwill balances are allocated to either individual or groups of CGUs that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination. Goodwill impairment is quantified by comparing a CGU's or a group of CGU's carrying value to its recoverable amount, which is the higher of fair value less cost to sell and value in use. Impairment losses are recognized immediately and cannot be reversed in future periods.
There was no impairment charges on goodwill recognized in 2024. We had a carrying value of $9,456 million in goodwill as at December 31, 2024. Additional information on goodwill can be found in Note 9 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of finite life and indefinite life intangible assets. Finite life intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis or using a units-of-production method, over the useful economic lives: i) Distribution, sales potential of field force, client relationships and asset administration contracts - 3 to 40 years ii) and internally generated software - 3 to 10 years. Amortization is charged through operating expenses. The useful lives of finite life intangible assets are reviewed annually, and the amortization is adjusted as necessary. Indefinite life intangibles are not amortized, and are assessed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. Impairment is assessed by comparing the carrying values of the indefinite life intangible assets to their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. If the carrying values of the indefinite life intangibles exceed their recoverable amounts, these assets are considered impaired, and a charge for impairment is recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The recoverable amount of intangible assets is determined using various valuation models, which require management to make certain judgments and assumptions that could affect the estimates of the recoverable amount.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 107
Impairment charges on intangible assets of $201 million were recognized in 2024 (2023 - $5 million) primarily related to an intangible asset related to bancassurance in Vietnam reflecting updates resulting from changes in regulatory and macro-economic factors.
As at December 31, 2024, our finite life intangible assets had a carrying value of $3.8 billion, which reflected the value of the field force, asset administration contracts, and Client relationships acquired as part of the AAM, BGO, Crescent, Clarica, Dialogue, DentaQuest, U.S. employee benefits, and CMG Asia business acquisitions, the ACB and Dah Sing bancassurance partnerships, as well as software costs. Our indefinite life intangible assets had a carrying value of $1.2 billion as at December 31, 2024. The value of the indefinite life intangible assets reflected fund management contracts of MFS, BGO, InfraRed, Crescent and AAM. Additional information on intangible assets can be found in Note 9 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes
Income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. Deferred income tax is provided using the liability method. Our provision for income taxes is calculated based on the tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the end of the reporting period.
As a multinational organization, we are subject to taxation in numerous jurisdictions. We seek to operate in a tax efficient manner while ensuring that we are in compliance with all laws and regulations. The determination of the required provision for current and deferred income taxes requires that we interpret tax legislation in the jurisdictions in which we operate and that we make assumptions about the expected timing of realization of deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Tax laws are complex and their interpretation requires significant judgment. The provision for income taxes reflects management's interpretation of the relevant tax laws and its best estimate of the income tax implications of the transactions and events during the period. We believe that our provisions for uncertain tax positions appropriately reflect the risk of tax positions that are under audit, dispute or appeal with tax authorities, or which are otherwise considered to involve uncertainty. The adequacy of our tax provision is reviewed at the end of each reporting period. To the extent that our interpretations differ from those of tax authorities or the timing of realization is not as expected, the provision for income taxes may increase or decrease in future periods to reflect actual experience. The amount of any increase or decrease cannot be reasonably estimated.
Deferred income tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax losses and unused tax credits to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences, unused tax losses and unused tax credits can be utilized. At each reporting period, we assess all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine the amount of deferred income tax assets to be recorded. If it is probable that the benefit of tax losses and tax deductions will not be realized, a deferred income tax asset is not recognized. The assessment requires significant estimates and judgment about future events based on the information available at the reporting date.
From time to time, local governments, in countries in which we operate, enact changes to statutory corporate income tax rates. These changes require us to review and re-measure our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the date of enactment. As at December 31, 2024, our net deferred tax asset in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position was $3,624 million, primarily in Canada. Any future tax rate reductions in jurisdictions where we carry a net deferred tax asset, could result in a reduction in the carrying value of the deferred tax asset and a corresponding income tax expense at the time of substantial enactment of a rate reduction.
The Pillar Two global minimum tax rules apply to us effective January 1, 2024 and have been substantively enacted in several jurisdictions in which we operate, including Canada, whose Global Minimum Tax Act became enacted in June 2024. The Pillar Two legislation requires the ultimate parent entity of a group to pay top-up tax, on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, on profits of its subsidiaries that are taxed below 15%. Our subsidiaries that are currently subject to a statutory rate or to a tax regime that could result in taxing profits at a rate below 15% include those in Bermuda, Hong Kong and Ireland. The Pillar Two legislation increased the effective tax rate on underlying net income by approximately one to two percentage points in 2024. The Q1'24 impacts, which were recorded in Q2'24 due to the timing of the legislation's enactment, are recorded in reported net income in Other adjustments and are not reflected in underlying net income. For additional information, refer to Note 19 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
On December 27, 2023, Bermuda enacted its Corporate Income Tax Act 2023, which will apply a 15% income tax beginning on January 1, 2025. The enacted legislation provides an economic transition adjustment that aligns an entity’s starting point for the tax regime more closely with its economic position prior to the application of the Corporate Income Tax Act 2023. The benefit of this economic transition adjustment was recognized in 2023. The Bermuda Corporate Income Tax is not expected to have a material impact on Sun Life’s consolidated financial statements when it becomes effective in 2025.
Pension Plans and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans for eligible employees. All of our significant defined benefit plans worldwide are closed to new entrants with new hires participating in defined contribution plans. Our defined benefit pension plans offer benefits based on length of service and final average earnings and certain plans offer some indexation of benefits. We maintain certain supplementary non-contributory defined benefit pension arrangements for eligible employees, which are primarily for benefits which are in excess of local tax limits. In addition to these plans, in some countries the Company sponsors certain post-retirement benefit plans (for medical, dental and/or life insurance benefits) for eligible qualifying employees and their dependents who meet certain requirements.
In Canada, since January 1, 2009, all new employees participate in a defined contribution plan, while existing employees continue to accrue future benefits in the prior plan which provides a defined benefit plan and an optional contributory defined contribution plan.
With the closure of the Canadian defined benefit plans to new entrants, the volatility associated with future service accruals for active members has been limited and will decline over time. As at December 31, 2024, there are no active employees accruing future service benefits in the U.S. defined benefit plans.
The major risks remaining in relation to past service obligations are increases in liabilities due to a decline in discount rates, greater life expectancy than assumed and adverse asset returns. We have significantly de-risked the investments of our material defined benefit pension plans Company-wide by systematically shifting the pension asset mix towards liability matching investments. The target for our significant plans is to minimize volatility in funded status arising from changes in discount rates and exposure to equity markets.
108 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
Due to the long-term nature of these defined benefit plans, the calculation of benefit expenses and accrued benefit obligations depends on various assumptions, including discount rates, rates of compensation increases, health care cost trend rates, retirement ages, mortality rates and termination rates. Based upon consultation with external pension actuaries, management determines the assumptions used for these plans on an annual basis. The discount rate used for our significant defined benefit plans is determined with reference to market yields of high-quality corporate bonds that are denominated in the same currency in which the benefits will be paid, and that have terms to maturity approximating the terms of obligations.
Actual experience may differ from that assumed, which would impact the valuation of defined benefit plans and the level of benefit expenses recognized in future years. Details of our pension and post-retirement benefit plans and the key assumptions used for the valuation these plans are included in Note 24 of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. Changes in Accounting Policies We have included in this section a summary of changes in accounting policies. Where there are references to Notes, these are part of our 2024 Annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
2.A New and Amended International Financial Reporting Standards Adopted in 2024
In September 2022, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 16 Leases to add subsequent measurement requirements for sale and leaseback transactions that satisfy the requirements in IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers to be accounted for as a sale. The amendments require a seller-lessee to subsequently measure lease liabilities arising from a leaseback in a way that it does not recognize any amount of the gain or loss that relates to the right of use it retains. The adoption of this amendment, effective January 1, 2024, did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
2.B New and Amended International Financial Reporting Standards to be Adopted in 2025 or Later
In April 2024, the IASB issued IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements ("IFRS 18") which replaces IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements. IFRS 18 introduces new requirements on presentation within the statement of profit or loss, disclosure of management-defined performance measures, and principles for aggregation and disaggregation of financial information in the financial statements and the notes. IFRS 18 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2027. IFRS 18 is to be applied retrospectively. We are currently assessing the impact that IFRS 18 will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2024, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures. The amendments clarify the derecognition of a financial liability settled through electronic transfer and introduces an accounting policy option to derecognize a financial liability settled through electronic transfer before the settlement date, if specific criteria are met. The amendments additionally clarify the classification of financial assets with environmental, social and corporate governance and similar features and also required additional disclosures for certain financial instruments. The amendments will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2026. The amendments are to be applied retrospectively. We are currently assessing the impact of these amendments on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
3. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that all relevant information is gathered and reported to senior management, including the Company's President and CEO, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), and Executive Vice-President, Chief Legal Officer and Public Affairs, on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding public disclosure.
An evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under rules adopted by the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and the SEC, as at December 31, 2024, was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of the Company's management, including the CEO and the CFO. Based on our evaluation, the CEO and the CFO concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at December 31, 2024.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with IFRS.
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2024, based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024.
Our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2024, has been audited by the Company's external auditor, Deloitte LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, who also audited our Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. As stated in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, they have expressed an unqualified opinion on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 109
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting for the period which began on January 1, 2024 and ended December 31, 2024 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
O. Legal and Regulatory Proceedings
Information concerning legal and regulatory matters is provided in our Annual Consolidated Financial Statements and the AIF, in each case for the year ended December 31, 2024.
P. Forward-looking Statements
From time to time, the Company makes written or oral forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, including the “safe harbour” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements contained in this document include statements (i) relating to our strategies, plans, targets, goals and priorities; (ii) relating to our growth initiatives and other business objectives; (iii) relating to estimated future payments for acquisition-related contingent considerations and options to purchase the remaining ownership interests of SLC Management affiliates; (iv) relating to the actions reflected in the restructuring charge recorded in Q2'24 (including expected annual savings resulting from such actions); (v) relating to the expected impact of the Pillar Two legislation on the effective tax rate on underlying net income; (vi) relating to the use of proceeds from the offering of the Series 2024-1 Subordinated Unsecured 5.12% Fixed/Floating Debentures due 2036; (vii) set out in this document under the heading I - Risk Management - Market Risk Sensitivities - Interest Rate Sensitivities; (viii) relating to expected changes in our LICAT ratio; (ix) that are predictive in nature or that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions; and (x) that include words such as “achieve”, “aim”, “ambition”, “anticipate”, “aspiration”, “assumption”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “goal”, “initiatives”, “intend”, “may”, “objective”, “outlook”, “plan”, “project”, “seek”, “should”, “strategy”, “strive”, “target”, “will”, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations. These statements represent our current expectations, estimates, and projections regarding future events and are not historical facts, and remain subject to change.
Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Future results and shareholder value may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to, among other factors, the matters set out in this document under the headings C - Profitability - 5 - Income taxes, F - Financial Strength and K - Risk Management and in SLF Inc.’s 2024 AIF under the heading Risk Factors, and the factors detailed in SLF Inc.’s other filings with Canadian and U.S. securities regulators, which are available for review at www.sedarplus.ca and www.sec.gov, respectively.
Medium-Term Financial Objectives
The Company's medium-term financial objectives set out in section B - Overview - 2 - Financial Objectives are forward-looking non-IFRS financial measures. Our ability to achieve those objectives is dependent on our success in achieving growth initiatives and business objectives and on certain key assumptions that include: (i) no significant changes in the level of interest rates; (ii) average total return on real estate and equity investments of approximately 8% per annum; (iii) credit experience in line with expectations; (iv) no significant changes in the level of our regulatory capital requirements; (v) no significant changes to our effective tax rate; (vi) no significant increase in the number of shares outstanding; and (vii) other key assumptions include: no material changes to our hedging program, hedging costs that are consistent with our expectations, no material assumption changes and no material accounting standard changes. Our underlying ROE is dependent upon capital levels and options for deployment of excess capital. Our medium-term financial objectives do not reflect the indirect effects of interest rate and equity market movements including the potential impacts on goodwill or the current valuation allowance on deferred tax assets as well as other items that may be non-operational in nature.
Our target dividend payout ratio of 40%-50% of our underlying net income assumes that economic conditions and our results will enable us to maintain our payout ratio in the target range, while maintaining a strong capital position. The declaration, amount and payment of dividends is subject to the approval of SLF Inc.'s Board of Directors and our compliance with the capital requirements in the Insurance Companies Act (Canada). Additional information on dividends is provided in the section J - Capital and Liquidity Management - 3 - Shareholder Dividends in this MD&A.
Although considered reasonable by the Company, we may not be able to achieve our medium-term financial objectives as the assumptions on which these objectives were based may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual results could differ materially from our medium-term financial objectives as described in the section B - Overview - 2 - Financial Objectives in this MD&A. Our medium-term financial objectives do not constitute guidance.
Risk Factors
Important risk factors that could cause our assumptions and estimates, and expectations and projections to be inaccurate and our actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this document, are set out below. The realization of our forward-looking statements essentially depends on our business performance which, in turn, is subject to many risks. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations include, but are not limited to: market risks - related to the performance of equity markets; changes or volatility in interest rates or credit spreads or swap spreads; real estate investments; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; and inflation; insurance risks - related to mortality experience, morbidity experience and longevity; policyholder behaviour; product design and pricing; the impact of higher-than-expected future expenses; and the availability, cost and effectiveness of reinsurance; credit risks - related to issuers of securities held in our investment portfolio, debtors, structured securities, reinsurers, counterparties, other financial institutions and other entities; business and strategic risks - related to global economic and geopolitical conditions; the design and implementation of business strategies; changes in distribution channels or Client behaviour including risks relating to market conduct by intermediaries and agents; the impact of competition; the performance of our investments and investment portfolios managed for Clients such as segregated and mutual funds; shifts in investing trends and Client preference towards products that differ from our investment products and strategies; changes in the legal or regulatory environment, including capital requirements and tax laws; environmental and social issues and their related laws and regulations; operational risks - related to breaches or
110 December 31, 2024 Sun Life Financial Inc. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
failure of information system security and privacy, including cyber-attacks; our ability to attract and retain employees; legal, regulatory compliance and market conduct, including the impact of regulatory inquiries and investigations; the execution and integration of mergers, acquisitions, strategic investments and divestitures; our information technology infrastructure; a failure of information systems and Internet-enabled technology; dependence on third-party relationships, including outsourcing arrangements; business continuity; model errors; information management; liquidity risks - the possibility that we will not be able to fund all cash outflow commitments as they fall due; and other risks - changes to accounting standards in the jurisdictions in which we operate; risks associated with our international operations, including our joint ventures; market conditions that affect our capital position or ability to raise capital; downgrades in financial strength or credit ratings; and tax matters, including estimates and judgements used in calculating taxes.
The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS Sun Life Financial Inc. December 31, 2024 111