EX-8.2 8 ex8-2.htm

展示8.2

日期：

明誠集團控股有限公司

8樓，祥泰工業大廈

16 香港新蒲崗大街

香港

注意：董事會

尊敬的先生們：

關於明成集團控股有限公司（「公司」）的法律意見回覆

我們是公司的法律顧問（”參與度”）關於法律中華人民共和國香港特別行政區（”洪 Kong”) 與公司在F-1表格上的註冊聲明有關，包括其所有修正案或補充（”註冊聲明”），本公司根據美國證券向美國證券交易委員會提交 1933 年法案（經修訂）及據此頒佈的規章條例（”規則”），與首次公開募股有關（”提供”) 由公司提供其普通股（”普通股”）和公司的上市納斯達克資本市場上的普通股（”納斯達”）。我們有資格香港的律師等都有資格就法律法規發表本意見自本文發佈之日起生效的香港。我們被要求發表意見關於下述事項。

適用法律

本意見僅限於香港法院在本意見日期適用的香港法律。因此，我們對除適用於香港法院現行香港法律之外的任何法律體系不表意見。本意見應根據香港法律解釋。在本意見中，香港法律僅指香港國內法而不包括其法律衝突規則。我們不承諾就與本意見日期後相關的任何事實或法律變化向您提供建議。

假設。

	3.	爲了發表本意見，我們已審閱了MS（HK）工程有限公司和MS工程有限公司（統稱“香港子公司「」的定義如股東協議中所述；”），並獲取了其他相關文件，以便我們認爲有必要或適當爲了發表本意見。在某些事實未經我們獨立核實的情況下，我們已依賴公司或香港子公司等適當代表所發表或做出的聲明。

	4.	此外，我們在發表此意見時，已經對其他事實和法律問題進行了必要的調查。

	5.	我們通過公司註冊局進行的公司搜索在所產生的信息方面有所限制。此外，公司搜索並不能對是否已經作出訂單或通過公司清算或指定一名清算人或其他人員來控制公司資產的決議做出最終判斷，因爲此類事項的通知可能不會立即被提交，並且一旦提交，可能不會立即出現在公司的公開文件中。

合夥人

律師

DAVID L.k. FONG 方良佳律師，TIMOTHY C.k. KWAN 關智傑律師，HERMAN H.m. LEE 李匡民律師，

HERMES H.C. SHIN 沈浩銓律師

BRUNO 陳震雄律師，鄭穎欣律師，洪苡寧律師，

PRISTINE 盧穎婷律師，吳家宜律師

在表達這個意見時，我們在沒有任何進一步的調查或獨立的驗證的情況下，做出以下假設（以下簡稱“假設。”):

	(i)	所有簽名、印章和蓋章均爲真實有效，每一方代表簽署的簽名均爲該方經授權的人士簽署，提交給我們的所有在與承諾事項相關的文件均爲原件，並且提交給我們作爲認證或複印件的文件均符合原件；文件提交給我們的所有在與承諾事項相關的文件均爲原件，並且提交給我們作爲認證或複印件的文件均符合原件；

	(ii)	在文件中的各方（除在香港設立的公司子公司以外）：(a) 如果是法人或其他實體，應在其組織和/或註冊所在的法律下合法成立並良好存續；或者(b) 如果是個人，應有完全民事行爲能力。他們/她/他應有充分的權力和授權根據其所在的法律組織或註冊所在的法律或其適用的法律執行、交付和履行其在此類文件中作爲一方的義務。

	(iii)	文件保持完全有效至本意見書日期，並未被撤銷、修訂或補充，未對這些文件進行任何修訂、修改、補充或其他變更，並未撤銷或終止提交給我們用於本法律意見目的的任何文件。

	(iv)	公司向我們提供的所有事實陳述的準確性和完整性，無論是口頭還是書面指示。

	(v)	上述公司搜索所披露的信息準確無誤，完整無缺，截至本意見形成時的時間，並且符合公司和相關公司的記錄。搜索不會漏報任何已經提交給或交付給公司註冊處，但尚未在進行搜索時處理的信息。

	(vi)	遵守與執行、交付、履行或執行文件可能適用的除香港之外的司法管轄區法律;

	(vii)	我們所提供給我們的公司的指示和信息是真實準確的，符合我們最好的信念；並且

	(viii)	根據最新的公司註冊信息，公司及相關公司的記錄在發表本意見時沒有發生任何變化。

Opinions

Subject to the Assumptions and the Qualifications (as defined below), we are of the opinion that:

(i)

The Company’s subsidiaries established in Hong Kong are validly existing and in good standing under the laws of Hong Kong. The Company’s subsidiaries in Hong Kong are operating their businesses legally and had fully complied with the Hong Kong Laws. None of them are facing any material legal proceedings or any material legal, governmental, arbitrative proceedings, actions, decisions, demands or orders before any competent court, government agency or arbitration body in Hong Kong;

(ii)

Hong Kong Courts may recognize and enforce judgments in civil and commercial matters by the Courts in the mainland via the Mainland Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance (Cap. 597) provided certain statutory requirements are satisfied. Hong Kong Courts may also recognize and enforce judgments from courts in other jurisdictions in accordance to the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance (Cap. 319) (“FJREO”), the Foreign Judgments (Restriction on Recognition and Enforcement) Ordinance (Cap. 46) and the common law principles. It is to be noted that probate and bankruptcy matters in relation to matrimonial matters would not fall within the scope that the FJREO would cover;

(iii)

The statements set forth in the Registration Statement under the captions “Risks related to doing business in Hong Kong”, “Regulations”, “Enforceability of civil liabilities” in each case insofar as such statements purport to describe or summarize the Hong Kong legal matters stated therein as at the date hereof, are true and accurate in all material respects, and fairly present and summarize in all material respects the Hong Kong legal matters stated therein as at the date hereof; and

(iv)

The statements set forth in the Registration Statement under the caption “Hong Kong Taxation” are true and accurate in all material respects and that such statements constitute our opinions.

Qualifications

Our opinion expressed above is subject to the following qualifications (the “Qualifications”):

(i)

Our opinion is limited to the laws of Hong Kong of general application on the date hereof. We have made no investigation of, and do not express or imply any views on, the laws of any jurisdiction other than Hong Kong. Accordingly, we express or imply no opinion directly or indirectly on the laws of any jurisdiction other than Hong Kong;

(ii)

The laws of Hong Kong referred to herein are laws and regulations publicly available and currently in force on the date hereof and there is no guarantee that any of such laws and regulations, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, will not be changed, amended or revoked in the future with or without retrospective effect;

(iii)

Our opinion is subject to the effects of (a) certain legal or statutory principles affecting the enforceability of contractual rights generally under the concepts of public interest, social ethics, national security, good faith, fair dealing, and applicable statutes of limitation; (b) any circumstance in connection with formulation, execution or performance of any legal documents that would be deemed materially mistaken, clearly unconscionable, fraudulent, coercionary or concealing illegal intentions with a lawful form; (c) judicial discretion with respect to the availability of specific performance, injunctive relief, remedies or defenses, or calculation of damages; and (d) the discretion of any competent Hong Kong legislative, administrative or judicial bodies in exercising their authority in Hong Kong;

(iv)

This opinion is issued based on the laws of Hong Kong that are currently in effect. For matters not explicitly provided under the laws of Hong Kong, the future interpretation, implementation and application of the specific requirements under the laws of Hong Kong are subject to the final discretion of competent Hong Kong legislative, administrative and judicial authorities, and there can be no assurance that the government agencies will not ultimately take a view that is contrary to our opinion stated above;

(v)

We may rely, as to matters of fact (but not as to legal conclusions), to the extent we deem proper, on certificates and confirmations of responsible officers of the Company and public searches conducted in Hong Kong;

(vi)

This opinion is intended to be used in the context which is specifically referred to herein. It should be read as a whole and each paragraph of the opinion should not be read independently; and

(vii)

As used in this opinion, the expression “to our best knowledge” or similar language with reference to matters of fact refers to the current actual knowledge of the solicitors of this firm who have worked on matters for the Company in connection with the Offering and the transactions contemplated thereunder. We have not undertaken any independent investigation to determine the existence or absence of any fact, and no inference as to our knowledge of the existence or absence of any fact should be drawn from our representation of the Company or the rendering of this opinion.

We hereby consent to the use of this opinion in, and the filing hereof as an exhibit to, the Registration Statement, and to the reference to our name in such Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Yours faithfully

David Fong & Co.