share_log

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:GLRE) Shares?

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:GLRE) Shares?

綠光資本再保險有限公司擁有哪些股東的大部分股東s(納斯達克:GLRE)股票?
Simply Wall St. ·  2020/07/30 17:09

0

The big shareholder groups in Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (NASDAQ:GLRE) have power over the company. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

中的大股東團體綠光資本再保險有限公司。(納斯達克代碼:GLRE)對公司擁有控制權。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。沃倫·巴菲特説,他喜歡“一家由有能力、以所有者為導向的人經營的、具有持久競爭優勢的企業”。因此,看到一些內部人持股是件好事,因為這可能表明管理層是以所有者為導向的。

Greenlight Capital Re is a smaller company with a market capitalization of US$256m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Greenlight Capital Re.

綠光資本再保險是一家規模較小的公司,市值為2.56億美元,因此它可能仍在許多機構投資者的雷達下飛行。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到,機構在股票登記處是顯而易見的。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者,以瞭解更多關於綠光資本再保險的信息。

View our latest analysis for Greenlight Capital Re

查看我們對Greenlight Capital Re的最新分析

0

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Greenlight Capital Re?

關於綠光資本再保險,機構持股告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Greenlight Capital Re. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone, since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Greenlight Capital Re, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者在綠光資本再保險公司擁有相當數量的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看綠光資本再保險公司(Greenlight Capital Re,下圖)過去的盈利軌跡。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

0

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Greenlight Capital Re. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is David Einhorn with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Simon Burton directly holds 0.013515699999999999 of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到,對衝基金在綠光資本再保險公司沒有有意義的投資。查看我們的數據可以看到,第一大股東是David·艾因霍恩,持有17%的流通股。作為參考,第二大股東持有約6.5%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.7%的股份。此外,該公司首席執行官西蒙·伯頓直接持有總流通股的0.013515699999999999。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查後,我們發現該公司超過一半的股份由前9名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小股東所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far I can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。據我所知,沒有分析師對該公司的報道,因此它很可能是在低調行事。

Insider Ownership Of Greenlight Capital Re

綠光資本再保險的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$256m, and insiders have US$58m worth of shares in their own names. I would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You canclick here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士持有綠光資本再保險有限公司相當比例的股份。它的市值僅為2.56億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值5800萬美元的股票。我想説,這表明了與股東的一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍相當小;一些內部人士可能創建了這家企業。你可以點擊這裏,看看這些內部人士是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, with a 23% stake in the company, will not easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

持有該公司23%股份的普通公眾不會輕易被忽視。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Greenlight Capital Re (at least 2 which can't be ignored), and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但為了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮一下無處不在的投資風險幽靈。我們已經確定了三個警告信號與綠光資本再投資(至少兩個不容忽視),瞭解他們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy . Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我們的免費一組有趣的潛在客户,擁有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, emaileditorial-team@simplywallst.com.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,通過電子郵件發送電子郵件至EDITICATION-Team@implywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論