share_log

Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.'s (NYSE:YMM) Institutional Investors Lost 4.0% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.'s (NYSE:YMM) Institutional Investors Lost 4.0% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

滿幫有限公司(紐交所:YMM)的機構投資者在過去一週損失了4.0%,但從長期收益中獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  03/24 17:55

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Full Truck Alliance's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Full Truck Alliance is 10%
  • 由於機構在股票中的大額持股,滿幫的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前12大股東持有51%的業務。
  • 滿幫的內部持股比例爲10%。

The end of cancer? These 15 emerging AI stocks are developing tech that will allow early identification of life changing diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's.

癌症的終結?這15只新興人工智能股票正在開發技術,能夠早期識別會改變生命的疾病,如癌症和阿爾茨海默病。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE:YMM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 58% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了滿幫(紐交所:YMM),理解該業務的所有權結構是很重要的。機構持有58%的股份,是公司最大股東。換句話說,這個群體在對公司的投資中將獲得最多的收益(或承擔最多的損失)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.0% last week. Still, the 82% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

投資虧損是股東都不喜歡的事情,尤其是上週其持有價值下降了4.0%的機構投資者。不過,82%的年收益可能幫助他們緩解了整體損失。然而,他們仍需注意未來可能的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Full Truck Alliance.

在下面的圖表中,我們仔細分析了滿幫的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:YMM Ownership Breakdown March 24th 2025
紐交所:YMM 所有權分解 2025年3月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Full Truck Alliance?

機構持股對滿幫的影響告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常會在向自身投資者報告時將自己與基準進行比較,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們往往會對該股票表現得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司在登記中會有一些機構,尤其是在它們正在成長的時候。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Full Truck Alliance. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Full Truck Alliance, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所見,機構投資者在滿幫中擁有相當大的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師對這隻股票進行了研究,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看滿幫過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:YMM Earnings and Revenue Growth March 24th 2025
紐交所:YMM 2025年3月24日的盈利和收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Full Truck Alliance is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is SB Investment Advisers (UK) Limited with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 5.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Hui Zhang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

機構投資者持有公司超過50%的股份,因此它們可以強有力地影響董事會決策。滿幫並不被對沖基金擁有。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是SB Investment Advisers (UK) Limited,持有11%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有10%和5.1%的流通股份。第二大股東Hui Zhang同時也是首席執行官。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對所有權數據的更深入分析表明,前12大股東的合計持股比例爲51%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師的觀點來實現。覆蓋該股票的分析師數量合理,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Full Truck Alliance

滿幫的內部人持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運營業務,但CEO將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股表明領導層像公司的真正所有者那樣思考時,內部持股是積極的。然而,高內部持股也可能給予公司內部小組巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$1.4b stake in this US$14b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有滿幫公司相當大比例的股份。看到內部人士在這家140億美元的業務中持有14億美元的股份,確實很有趣。大多數人會說這表明與股東之間有良好的關係,特別是在這樣規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股比例

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有公司16%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這個團體不一定能做決定,但他們肯定能對公司運營產生真實的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資所有權

With an ownership of 16%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

擁有16%股權的股權投資公司有能力在專注於創造價值的公司策略中發揮作用。有時候我們會看到股權投資公司長期留存,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,正如名稱所示,通常不會投資於上市公司。在一段時間後,他們可能會考慮賣出並將資本重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Full Truck Alliance better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是有意義的。但爲了更好地理解滿幫,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史。你也可以通過訪問這張免費的歷史營業收入和收益詳細圖表來查看。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你和我一樣,可能會考慮這家公司是會增長還是衰退。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數據是基於最近十二個月的數據計算的,這指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月的時間段。這可能與全年年報數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋嗎?對內容有疑慮嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall ST撰寫,屬於一般性質。我們提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,僅使用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不意圖提供財務建議。它不構成對買入或賣出任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在提供基於基本數據的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
評論 評論 · 瀏覽 287

熱點推薦

搶先評論

聲明

本頁的譯文內容由軟件翻譯。富途將竭力但卻不能保證翻譯內容之準確和可靠,亦不會承擔因任何不準確或遺漏而引起的任何損失或損害。