share_log

Is GXO Logistics (NYSE:GXO) Using Too Much Debt?

Is GXO Logistics (NYSE:GXO) Using Too Much Debt?

GXO物流(紐交所:GXO)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  03/24 11:15

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that GXO Logistics, Inc. (NYSE:GXO) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

傳奇基金經理李錄(查理·芒格支持的人)曾說過,「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受資本的永久性損失。」 在審查一家公司有多大的風險時,考慮其資產負債表是很自然的,因爲當企業倒閉時通常涉及到債務。我們可以看到GXO物流公司(紐交所代碼:GXO)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務帶來了多少風險?

AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early.

人工智能即將改變醫療保健。這20只股票正在致力於從早期診斷到藥物發現的所有工作。最棒的是 - 它們的市值都在100億美元以下 - 仍然有時間提前入場。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務會幫助企業,直到企業在用新資本或自由現金流償還時遇到困難。在最壞的情況下,如果一家公司無法償還其債權人,就可能會破產。雖然這種情況並不太常見,但我們經常看到揹負債務的公司因貸方迫使它們在低迷的價格下募集資金而永久性稀釋股東的股份。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,沒有任何負面後果。考慮企業使用了多少債務時,首先要查看其現金和債務的結合情況。

What Is GXO Logistics's Debt?

GXO物流的債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of December 2024 GXO Logistics had US$2.36b of debt, an increase on US$1.53b, over one year. However, it does have US$413.0m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$1.94b.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但截至2024年12月,GXO物流的債務爲23.6億美金,較去年的15.3億美金有所增加。然而,它擁有41300萬美元的現金來抵消這些債務,導致淨債務約爲19.4億美金。

big
NYSE:GXO Debt to Equity History March 24th 2025
紐交所:GXO債務與股本歷史 2025年3月24日

How Strong Is GXO Logistics' Balance Sheet?

GXO物流的資產負債表有多強?

According to the last reported balance sheet, GXO Logistics had liabilities of US$3.19b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$5.04b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$413.0m in cash and US$1.84b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$5.98b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據最近報告的資產負債表,GXO物流在12個月內有31.9億美金的負債,以及在12個月後有50.4億美金的負債。抵消這些負債,它擁有41300萬美元的現金和18.4億美金即將到期的應收賬款。因此,它的負債總額超過59.8億美金,超過了現金和近期應收賬款的總和。

When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$4.82b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.

當您考慮到這種缺口超過公司48.2億美金的市值時,您可能會傾向於仔細審查資產負債表。如果公司被迫通過在當前股票價格下籌集資金來償還負債,假設將需要極其嚴重的稀釋。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了評估公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比值,以及息稅前利潤(EBIT)與利息支出(即利息覆蓋率)的比值。通過這種方式,我們可以考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

GXO Logistics has net debt worth 2.4 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 2.8 times the interest expense. In large part that's due to the company's significant depreciation and amortisation charges, which arguably mean its EBITDA is a very generous measure of earnings, and its debt may be more of a burden than it first appears. GXO Logistics grew its EBIT by 2.3% in the last year. That's far from incredible but it is a good thing, when it comes to paying off debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine GXO Logistics's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

GXO 物流的淨債務是 EBITDA 的 2.4 倍,這並不算太多,但其利息覆蓋率有點低,EBIT 僅爲利息費用的 2.8 倍。這在很大程度上是由於公司顯著的折舊和攤銷費用,這可以說使得其 EBITDA 成爲一個非常慷慨的收益衡量標準,而其債務可能比最初看起來的更有負擔。GXO 物流在去年 EBIT 增長了 2.3%。這遠不算 Incredible,但在償還債務方面是件好事。當分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是開始的地方。但未來的收益,遠比其他任何因素,更能判斷 GXO 物流未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, GXO Logistics produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 58% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最後,一家公司只能用現實的現金來償還債務,而不是會計利潤。因此,我們總是檢查 EBIT 轉換爲自由現金流的金額。在過去三年中,GXO 物流產生了穩定的自由現金流,相當於其 EBIT 的 58%,大約是我們所期望的。這筆自由現金流使公司在適當的時候能夠償還債務。

Our View

Our View

On the face of it, GXO Logistics's interest cover left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Once we consider all the factors above, together, it seems to us that GXO Logistics's debt is making it a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for GXO Logistics you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.

表面上看,GXO 物流的利息覆蓋率讓我們對該股票持謹慎態度,其總負債水平也不比一年中最繁忙的晚上那間空無一人的餐廳更具誘惑力。但好的一面是,其 EBIT 轉換爲自由現金流的比例是個好兆頭,並讓我們更加樂觀。一旦我們將上述所有因素綜合考慮,在我們看來,GXO 物流的債務使其風險略高。有人喜歡這種風險,但我們意識到潛在的陷阱,所以我們可能更傾向於它承擔更少的債務。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解大多數關於債務的信息。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。案例提示:我們發現了 3 個您應該注意的 GXO 物流的警告信號,其中 1 個稍顯不快。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,關注那些淨債務爲零的公司往往是更好的選擇。您可以訪問我們特殊的這份公司名單(所有公司都具有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋嗎?對內容有疑慮嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall ST撰寫,屬於一般性質。我們提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,僅使用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不意圖提供財務建議。它不構成對買入或賣出任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在提供基於基本數據的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
評論 評論 · 瀏覽 398

熱點推薦

搶先評論

聲明

本頁的譯文內容由軟件翻譯。富途將竭力但卻不能保證翻譯內容之準確和可靠,亦不會承擔因任何不準確或遺漏而引起的任何損失或損害。