Why Warner Music Group Corp. (NASDAQ:WMG) Looks Like A Quality Company
Why Warner Music Group Corp. (NASDAQ:WMG) Looks Like A Quality Company
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine Warner Music Group Corp. (NASDAQ:WMG), by way of a worked example.
許多投資者仍在學習分析股票時各種有用的指標。本文旨在幫助那些想要了解股本回報率(ROE)的人。我們將通過一個實例來使用ROE來研究華納音樂集團(納斯達克:WMG)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
股本回報率或ROE是評估公司管理層利用公司資本的效率的關鍵指標。更簡單地說,它衡量的是公司相對於股東權益的盈利能力。
The end of cancer? These 15 emerging AI stocks are developing tech that will allow early identification of life changing diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's.
癌症的終結?這15只新興人工智能股票正在開發技術,能夠早期識別會改變生命的疾病,如癌症和阿爾茨海默病。
How Is ROE Calculated?
ROE是如何計算的?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
ROE可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 凈利潤(來自持續經營) ÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Warner Music Group is:
因此,基於上述公式,華納音樂集團的ROE爲:
75% = US$526m ÷ US$697m (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024).
75% = 52600萬美金 ÷ 69700萬美金 (基於截至2024年12月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.75 in profit.
「回報」是指在過去十二個月內稅後賺取的金額。 另一種理解方式是,對於每1美元的股本,公司能夠賺取0.75美元的利潤。
Does Warner Music Group Have A Good ROE?
華納音樂集團的ROE好嗎?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. As you can see in the graphic below, Warner Music Group has a higher ROE than the average (14%) in the Entertainment industry.
通過將公司的ROE與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其好壞。 這種方法的侷限性在於,有些公司甚至在同一行業分類內也相互迥異。 正如您在下面的圖形中看到的,華納音樂集團的ROE高於娛樂行業的平均水平(14%)。

That's what we like to see. With that said, a high ROE doesn't always indicate high profitability. Aside from changes in net income, a high ROE can also be the outcome of high debt relative to equity, which indicates risk. Our risks dashboardshould have the 3 risks we have identified for Warner Music Group.
這正是我們想要看到的。雖然如此,高ROE並不總是意味着高盈利能力。除了凈利潤的變化外,高ROE也可能是由於與股本相比的高債務,這表示風險。我們的風險儀表板應該包含我們爲華納音樂集團識別的三個風險。
How Does Debt Impact Return On Equity?
債務對股東權益回報率的影響是什麼?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
大多數公司需要資金——來自某處——來增長他們的利潤。這筆現金可能來自留存收益、發行新股(股本)或債務。在前兩種選擇的情況下,ROE會反映這種用於增長的現金使用。而在後者情況下,債務的使用會提高回報,但不會改變股本。因此,債務的使用可以提高ROE,儘管在暴風雨天氣的情況下,會增加額外的風險,打個比方。
Combining Warner Music Group's Debt And Its 75% Return On Equity
結合華納音樂集團的債務和其75%的股東權益回報率
It seems that Warner Music Group uses a huge volume of debt to fund the business, since it has an extremely high debt to equity ratio of 5.67. So although the company has an impressive ROE, the company might not have been able to achieve this without the significant use of debt.
華納音樂集團似乎使用了大量的債務來資助其業務,因爲它有一個極高的債務與股本比率,達到5.67。因此,儘管公司有着令人印象深刻的ROE,但如果沒有大量使用債務,公司可能無法實現這一點。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. All else being equal, a higher ROE is better.
股東權益回報率是衡量企業盈利能力及回饋股東的一個有用指標。在我們的書中,最高質量的公司在低債務的情況下也具有高股東權益回報率。在其他條件均等的情況下,更高的ROE更好。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但ROE只是更大拼圖的一部分,因爲高質量的企業通常以高倍數的盈利進行交易。考慮到當前價格中反映的盈利增長預期,盈利增長的可能率也必須被考慮。因此,我認爲查看關於該公司的分析師預測的免費報告可能是值得的。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果您更願意查看另一家公司——一家潛在財務更優的公司——那麼不要錯過這份有趣公司的免費名單,這些公司擁有高ROE和低債務。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋嗎?對內容有疑慮嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall ST撰寫,屬於一般性質。我們提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,僅使用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不意圖提供財務建議。它不構成對買入或賣出任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在提供基於基本數據的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。