Institutional Investors Must Be Pleased After a 10% Gain Last Week That Adds to Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:PGY) One-year Returns
Institutional Investors Must Be Pleased After a 10% Gain Last Week That Adds to Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:PGY) One-year Returns
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Pagaya Technologies implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構在Pagaya Technologies中的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響。
- 前8大股東持有50%的股份。
- 最近內部人士的賣出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ:PGY), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 39% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (納斯達克:PGY),了解該業務的所有權結構是很重要的。機構持有39%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。換句話說,這些機構從對公司的投資中獲得的收益最多(或者損失也最多)。
Last week's 10% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 7.0% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週10%的漲幅意味着機構投資者處於積極的一方,即使公司展現出了強勁的長期趨勢。目前股東的年回報率爲7.0%,上週的漲幅更是如錦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pagaya Technologies, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Pagaya Technologies的每種所有者類型,首先是下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pagaya Technologies?
機構持股情況告訴我們什麼關於Pagaya Technologies?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構會將其表現與接近當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更關注那些被包含在主要指數中的公司。
Pagaya Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pagaya Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Pagaya Technologies已在股份登記中擁有機構。實際上,他們在公司中持有顯著的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。當多家機構持有同一只股票時,總會存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會競爭快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Pagaya Technologies的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更加複雜。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Pagaya Technologies. Our data shows that Viola Group is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.4% and 6.8% of the stock. Gal Krubiner, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
對沖基金在Pagaya Technologies的股份不多。我們的數據表明,Viola Group是最大的股東,佔流通股份的11%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約7.4%和6.8%的股票。第三大股東Gal Krubiner恰好也是董事會成員。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前8大股東佔據了超過一半的股份登記,少數小股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。許多分析師關注這隻股票,因此你可以很容易地查看預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of Pagaya Technologies
Pagaya Technologies的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內幕人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算在內。管理層最終對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股表明領導層像公司的真正所有者那樣思考時,內部持股是積極的。然而,高內部持股也可能給予公司內部小組巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Pagaya Technologies Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$795m, and insiders have US$148m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Pagaya Technologies Ltd.相當合理的股份比例。它的市值只有79500萬美元,內部人士名下的股票價值14800萬美元。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的對齊,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相對較小;一些內部人士可能創辦了該企業。你可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股比例
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有20%的股份,因此不可輕易忽視。雖然這種股份比例可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資所有權
Private equity firms hold a 18% stake in Pagaya Technologies. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股權投資公司在Pagaya Technologies中持有18%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵採取有助於市場認識到公司價值的策略。另一方面,這些持有者可能在公司上市後選擇退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私營公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 3.7%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私營公司擁有3.7%的流通股份。這可能值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,例如內部人士,對這些私營公司有興趣,那應該在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Pagaya Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Pagaya Technologies that you should be aware of.
考慮不同群體持有公司的股票始終是值得的。但要更好地理解Pagaya Technologies,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了Pagaya Technologies的2個警告信號,你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你和我一樣,可能會考慮這家公司是會增長還是衰退。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數據是基於最近十二個月的數據計算的,這指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月的時間段。這可能與全年年報數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋嗎?對內容有疑慮嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall ST撰寫,屬於一般性質。我們提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,僅使用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不意圖提供財務建議。它不構成對買入或賣出任何股票的推薦,也未考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在提供基於基本數據的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。
評論(0)
請選擇舉報原因