Smurfit Westrock Plc's (NYSE:SW) Institutional Investors Lost 3.6% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Smurfit Westrock Plc's (NYSE:SW) Institutional Investors Lost 3.6% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Smurfit Westrock implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 15 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構在Smurfit WestRock的重大持股意味着他們對公司股價具有重要影響
- 前15大股東持有該公司的51%。
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Smurfit Westrock Plc (NYSE:SW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 84% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着Smurfit WestRock Plc (紐交所:SW),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約84%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.6% in value last week. Still, the 34% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧損,尤其是那些上週看到其持股價值下降3.6%的機構投資者。儘管如此,34%的年度收益可能幫助減輕了他們的整體損失。但是,他們應該對未來可能出現的進一步損失保持警惕。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Smurfit Westrock.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Smurfit WestRock的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Smurfit Westrock?
機構持股對Smurfit WestRock的意義是什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
Smurfit Westrock already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Smurfit Westrock's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Smurfit WestRock已經在股份註冊上有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們對其看好。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會錯。而且,當多家機構共同持有一隻股票時,總是存在"擁擠交易"的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競爭快速出售股票。這種風險在缺乏增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以看到Smurfit WestRock的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,總是有更多的故事。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Smurfit Westrock is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.8% and 4.8% of the stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使顯著的權力。 Smurfit WestRock並不被對沖基金擁有。 先鋒集團目前是公司的最大股東,持有15%的流通股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約7.8%和4.8%的股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到51%的股份由前15大股東控制,這意味着沒有任何單一股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Smurfit Westrock
Smurfit WestRock的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that Smurfit Westrock Plc insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$10m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,Smurfit WestRock Plc 的內部人士持有公司不到1%的股份。 這是一家非常大的公司,因此內部人士擁有大比例股份將令人感到驚訝。儘管他們的持股不足1%,但我們可以看到,董事會成員總共擁有價值1000萬美元的股份(以當前價格計算)。 可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中持有16%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體不一定能夠控制局面,但確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Smurfit Westrock is showing 6 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 3 of those can't be ignored...
我發現查看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,Smurfit WestRock在我們的投資分析中顯示出6個警告信號,其中3個是我們無法忽視的...
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。
評論(0)
請選擇舉報原因