share_log

With 88% Ownership of the Shares, Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 88% Ownership of the Shares, Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

韋伯斯特金融公司(紐交所:WBS)擁有88%的股份,機構投資者佔據主導地位。
Simply Wall St ·  01/29 13:40

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Webster Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在韋伯斯特金融的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響。
  • 共有13位投資者在公司中持有51%的多數股份。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 88% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制韋伯斯特金融公司(紐交所:WBS),了解公司的股權結構是很重要的。 持有公司最多股份的群體,具體來說,約佔88%,是機構。 換句話說,這個群體從他們對公司的投資中獲得的收益最大(或損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

因爲機構股東擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策通常會受到重視,尤其是對於個人投資者。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常代表着對其未來的巨大信心。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Webster Financial.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於韋伯斯特金融的情況。

big
NYSE:WBS Ownership Breakdown January 29th 2025
紐交所:WBS 2025年1月29日的股權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Webster Financial?

機構持股對韋伯斯特金融告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

Webster Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Webster Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

韋伯斯特金融的股份註冊上已經有機構參與。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這在專業投資者中暗示了一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不少見。因此,查看韋伯斯特金融過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:WBS Earnings and Revenue Growth January 29th 2025
紐交所:WBS 2025年1月29日的收益和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Webster Financial. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.1% and 4.9% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到,對韋伯斯特金融的對沖基金投資並不顯著。我們的數據顯示,先鋒集團是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約9.1%和4.9%的股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前13大股東在公司中的合計持股比例爲51%,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Webster Financial

韋伯斯特金融的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Webster Financial Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$92m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義持有韋伯斯特金融公司的股票不到1%。作爲一家大型公司,我們只期望內部人士持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值9200萬美元的股份。在這種情況下,更有意思的是看看這些內部人士是買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Webster Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆持有11%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對韋伯斯特金融公司有一定的影響力。雖然這一群體不能完全掌控局面,但確實能對公司的運行產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Webster Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Webster Financial that you should be aware of.

始終值得考慮公司中不同股東的情況。但爲了更好地理解韋伯斯特金融,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們發現了韋伯斯特金融的1個警告信號,這是您需要注意的。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
評論 評論 · 瀏覽 319

熱點推薦

搶先評論

聲明

本頁的譯文內容由軟件翻譯。富途將竭力但卻不能保證翻譯內容之準確和可靠,亦不會承擔因任何不準確或遺漏而引起的任何損失或損害。