share_log

WeRide Inc. (NASDAQ:WRD) Surges 16%; Retail Investors Who Own 52% Shares Profited Along With Insiders

WeRide Inc. (NASDAQ:WRD) Surges 16%; Retail Investors Who Own 52% Shares Profited Along With Insiders

WeRide Inc. (納斯達克:WRD) 股價上漲16%;持有52%股份的散戶投資者與內部人士一起獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  01/27 15:14

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significant control over WeRide by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 48% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in WeRide is 16%
  • 零售投資者對WeRide的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上有更多的影響力。
  • 前七大股東持有48%的股份。
  • WeRide的內部持股比例爲16%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of WeRide Inc. (NASDAQ:WRD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 52% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制着WeRide公司(納斯達克:WRD),理解公司的股權結構是重要的。零售投資者持有52%的股份,擁有公司最多的股份。這意味着如果股票上漲,投資者將獲得最大的利益(如果出現下跌,則損失最大)。

While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 16% price gain, insiders also received a 16% cut.

儘管零售投資者是上週16%價格上漲後獲益最多的群體,但內部人士也獲得了16%的收益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of WeRide.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了WeRide的不同持股群體。

big
NasdaqGM:WRD Ownership Breakdown January 27th 2025
納斯達克GM:WRD 持股分解 2025年1月27日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WeRide?

機構持股的缺乏對WeRide意味着什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

小公司通常交易不活躍,往往缺乏機構投資者,但大公司沒有機構投資者的情況則較少見。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of WeRide, for yourself, below.

沒有機構持有一家公司的股份可能有多種原因。 通常,小型新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理在公司中建立有意義的持倉幾乎不可能。 另一方面,專業投資者可能會避開某家公司,因爲他們認爲那不是投資的最佳選擇。 機構投資者可能會認爲該業務的歷史增長並不令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在影響。 你可以在下面看到WeRide過去的營業收入表現。

big
NasdaqGM:WRD Earnings and Revenue Growth January 27th 2025
納斯達克GM:WRD 2025年1月27日的收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in WeRide. Zhengzhou Yutong Group Co.,Ltd is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.7% and 7.6% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Xu Han directly holds 5.0% of the total shares outstanding.

我們注意到對WeRide的對沖基金沒有重要投資。鄭州宇通集團有限公司目前是最大的股東,持有16%的流通股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約7.7%和7.6%的股票。此外,公司CEO徐漢直接持有5%的總流通股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 7 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的持股數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前7大股東合計持有的股份不足註冊總股本的一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有哪個單一股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of WeRide

WeRide的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of WeRide Inc.. Insiders own US$690m worth of shares in the US$4.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有 WeRide Inc. 相當比例的股份。內部人士在這家價值 42億美元的公司中持有價值 69000萬美元的股份。這相當有意義。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能想查看這張顯示內部人士最近交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 52% stake in WeRide, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公衆一般是個人投資者,他們持有 WeRide 52% 的 substantial 股份,這表明這是一支相當受歡迎的股票。這種規模的所有權爲公衆投資者提供了一定的集體權力。他們可以並且可能會影響高管薪酬、分紅政策和提議的業務收購決策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 15%, private equity firms could influence the WeRide board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

持有15%股份的股權投資公司可以影響WeRide的董事會。一些投資者可能因此受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠推動策略,幫助市場認識到公司的價值。另一方面,這些持有者可能在公司上市後會退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the WeRide stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

似乎私營公司持有WeRide股票的16%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人士通過持有私營公司的股份而對一家上市公司產生興趣,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這可以作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - WeRide has 3 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

我發現研究一家公司到底由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險 — WeRide有3個警告信號(其中1個很重要),我們認爲你應該了解這些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
評論 評論 · 瀏覽 364

熱點推薦

搶先評論

聲明

本頁的譯文內容由軟件翻譯。富途將竭力但卻不能保證翻譯內容之準確和可靠,亦不會承擔因任何不準確或遺漏而引起的任何損失或損害。