share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After SFL Corporation Ltd.'s (NYSE:SFL) Latest 4.1% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After SFL Corporation Ltd.'s (NYSE:SFL) Latest 4.1% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

機構投資者可能會在SFL Corporation Ltd.(紐交所:SFL)最新4.1%的跌幅加重年內損失後採取嚴厲措施。
Simply Wall St ·  01/27 10:00

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies SFL's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着SFL的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 共有12位投資者持有公司51%的大多數股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 45% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着SFL Corporation Ltd. (紐交所:SFL),了解業務的股權結構非常重要。持有最大份額的一組爲機構,擁有45%的股份。換句話說,這一組面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 4.1% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 6.8% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in SFL's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

機構投資者上週看到他們的持有價值下降了4.1%。這一類投資者可能尤其對當前的損失感到擔憂,這使得股東的年損失增加到6.8%。機構或稱爲「流動性提供者」控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股票價格的波動有很大的影響力。因此,如果SFL的股票價格繼續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感覺被迫賣出該股票,這對個人投資者來說可能並不是理想的情況。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of SFL.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於SFL的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:SFL Ownership Breakdown January 27th 2025
紐交所:SFL 股權分佈 2025年1月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SFL?

機構所有權告訴我們關於SFL的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

We can see that SFL does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SFL, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到SFL確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會進行錯誤投資,就像其他人一樣。如果有兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出某隻股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看SFL過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:SFL Earnings and Revenue Growth January 27th 2025
紐交所:SFL 盈利與營業收入增長 2025年1月27日

SFL is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Greenwich Holdings Ltd., with ownership of 19%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

SFL並不被對沖基金持有。公司的最大股東是格林威治控股有限公司,持股比例爲19%。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有大約8.8% 的流通股,第三大股東則持有6.8%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更深入地查看我們的持股數據,前12大股東的合計持股爲51%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of SFL

SFL的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of SFL Corporation Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$1.5m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有SFL Corporation Ltd.的股份不到1%。我們確實注意到,內部人士可能通過私營公司或其他企業結構間接持有股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值150萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例股份更重要。可以說,近期的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in SFL. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有SFL 36%的股份。雖然這樣的持股比例可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 19%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司19%的股份。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得查看這些私營公司的所有者。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過一個單獨的私營公司在一家上市公司中持有股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand SFL better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - SFL has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

考慮持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解SFL,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例 - SFL有3個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
評論 評論 · 瀏覽 274

熱點推薦

搶先評論

聲明

本頁的譯文內容由軟件翻譯。富途將竭力但卻不能保證翻譯內容之準確和可靠,亦不會承擔因任何不準確或遺漏而引起的任何損失或損害。