share_log

Institutional Investors Control 86% of Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 5.2%

Institutional Investors Control 86% of Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 5.2%

機構投資者控制了邁威爾科技公司(納斯達克:MRVL)86%的股份,上週股票上漲5.2%後,他們得到了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  01/08 22:27

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Marvell Technology's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 顯著的高機構持股意味着邁威爾科技的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
  • 前15大股東持有該公司的51%。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着邁威爾科技有限公司(納斯達克:MRVL),了解公司的股權結構非常重要。持有最大份額的群體是擁有86%股份的機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 5.2% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 84%.

因此,在上週公司股價上漲5.2%之後,機構投資者獲得了最多的回報。上週的收益將進一步提升股東的一年回報,目前爲84%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Marvell Technology.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於邁威爾科技不同的股東群體。

big
NasdaqGS:MRVL Ownership Breakdown January 8th 2025
納斯達克GS:MRVL 股東構成 2025年1月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marvell Technology?

機構持股對邁威爾科技意味着什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Marvell Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Marvell Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在邁威爾科技中擁有相當的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師對該股票進行了研究並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。當多個機構持有某隻股票時,存在他們在一個'擁擠的交易'中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會爭先恐後地快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到邁威爾科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是比這更復雜。

big
NasdaqGS:MRVL Earnings and Revenue Growth January 8th 2025
納斯達克GS:MRVL 盈利和營業收入增長 2025年1月8日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Marvell Technology is not owned by hedge funds. FMR LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 邁威爾科技並不被對沖基金所擁有。 FMR LLC目前是公司的最大股東,持有15%的流通股。 作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.6%的流通股,第三大股東的持股比例爲7.1%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前15名股東在該公司合計擁有51%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司有顯著控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Marvell Technology

邁威爾科技的內部控制權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Marvell Technology, Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$356m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義持有的邁威爾科技公司股份不到1%。這是一個非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有大量股份將令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股金額不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員集體擁有價值35600萬美元的股份(按照當前價格)。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Marvell Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆一般是個別投資者,持有邁威爾科技14%的股份。雖然這個持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,這可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Marvell Technology .

雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體的情況非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲重要。 因此,您應該注意到我們與邁威爾科技發現的一個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論