share_log

With 63% Ownership in Expand Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:EXE), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 63% Ownership in Expand Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:EXE), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在Expand Energy Corporation(纳斯达克:EXE)中拥有63%的股份,机构投资者在这项业务上押注很多。
Simply Wall St ·  01/08 20:20

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Expand Energy's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 由于机构在股票中的大量持股,Expand Energy的股票价格可能会受到他们交易决定的影响。
  • 前18大股东拥有公司的50%。
  • 内部人士最近一直在卖出。

If you want to know who really controls Expand Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:EXE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 63% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了Expand Energy Corporation(纳斯达克:EXE),那么你需要查看其股东名册的构成。机构以63%的持股比例,拥有该公司最多的股份。换句话说,机构面临最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$723m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 35% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

在公司上周市值增长72300万美元后,机构投资者的前景看起来不错。当前一年的投资回报率为35%,上周的增长将会受到热烈欢迎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Expand Energy.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于Expand Energy的不同持股群体。

big
NasdaqGS:EXE Ownership Breakdown January 8th 2025
纳斯达克GS:EXE 持股比例 2025年1月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Expand Energy?

机构持股告诉我们关于Expand Energy什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Expand Energy. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Expand Energy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所见,机构投资者在Expand Energy中拥有相当的股份。这显示出专业投资者之间的一些可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会进行糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,查看Expand Energy的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是最重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:EXE Earnings and Revenue Growth January 8th 2025
纳斯达克GS:EXE 盈利和营业收入增长 2025年1月8日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Expand Energy. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Blackstone Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 5.5%.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。 我们注意到对Expand Energy的对冲基金没有进行有意义的投资。 普信集团目前是该公司最大的股东,拥有11%的流通股份。 第二大和第三大股东分别是先锋集团和黑石集团,持有相同数量的股份,各为5.5%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步调查,我们发现前18名股东在公司拥有50%的股份,这表明没有单一股东对公司有显著控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构的所有权是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。分析师情绪的研究也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在覆盖该股票,因此查看他们的预期可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Expand Energy

Expand Energy的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然对内部人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层运行业务,但CEO会向董事会报告,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that Expand Energy Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$49m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,Expand Energy Corporation的内部人士拥有不到1%的公司股份。但他们可能通过我们尚未发觉的企业结构间接持有利益。由于公司规模庞大,我们不期望内部人士拥有大比例的股票。他们共同持有价值4900万美元的股票。在这种情况下,观察这些内部人士的买入或卖出动作可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Expand Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众,通常是个人投资者,持有Expand Energy 28%的股份。虽然这种股份规模可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,这可能不足以改变公司的政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 5.5% stake in Expand Energy. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

股权投资公司持有Expand Energy 5.5%的股份。这表明他们在关键政策决策中可能具有影响力。有些人可能对此感到满意,因为股权投资有时是积极的,能够让管理层负责。但有时,股权投资则是在公司上市后选择撤出。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Expand Energy (2 don't sit too well with us) that you should be aware of.

我发现研究谁真正拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经识别出Expand Energy的5个警告信号(有2个让我们感到不太舒服),你应该注意这些。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发