share_log

With 72% Ownership of the Shares, The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE:SCHW) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 72% Ownership of the Shares, The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE:SCHW) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

由於機構投資者佔有72%的股份,嘉信理財公司(紐交所:SCHW)被機構所有者嚴重主導。
Simply Wall St ·  01/08 01:28

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Charles Schwab implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構在嘉信理財的重大持股意味着他們對公司股票價格有顯著影響。
  • 50%的業務由前16名股東持有。
  • 內部人士最近出售了股票。

If you want to know who really controls The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE:SCHW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 72% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了嘉信理財公司(紐交所:SCHW),那麼你需要查看其股票登記的構成。持有該公司最多股份的群體大約佔72%,實際上是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或在下跌時損失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

因爲機構股東擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策通常會受到重視,尤其是對於個人投資者。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常代表着對其未來的巨大信心。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Charles Schwab.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於嘉信理財的哪些信息。

big
NYSE:SCHW Ownership Breakdown January 7th 2025
紐交所:SCHW 股權分佈 2025年1月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Charles Schwab?

機構所有權告訴我們嘉信理財的情況如何。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

Charles Schwab already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Charles Schwab, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

嘉信理財的股份登記中已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好小心依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看嘉信理財過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:SCHW Earnings and Revenue Growth January 7th 2025
紐交所:SCHW 2025年1月7日的盈利和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Charles Schwab. The Toronto-Dominion Bank is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.0% and 5.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要的權力。對沖基金在嘉信理財的股份並不多。多倫多道明銀行目前是最大的股東,持有10%的流通股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.0%和5.7%的流通股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前16大股東合計擁有公司50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有顯著的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Charles Schwab

嘉信理財的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in The Charles Schwab Corporation. Insiders own US$1.9b worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東可能會對了解到內部人士持有嘉信理財公司的股票感興趣。內部人士擁有價值19億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的良好利益一致性。不過,值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆普遍,尤其是零售投資者,持有公司12%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。儘管這部分持股可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 4.3%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到私營公司持有4.3%的發行股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。 有時候,內部人員通過私營公司的持有,而不是作爲個人的身份擁有上市公司的利益。雖然很難得出廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這可以作爲進一步研究的領域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 10% of Charles Schwab. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

我們認爲上市公司擁有嘉信理財10%的股份。我們不能確定,但很可能這是一個戰略性股份。這些業務可能是相似的,或者合作在一起。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Charles Schwab has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例——我們認爲嘉信理財有1個警告信號,您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論