share_log

With 79% Ownership, Accenture Plc (NYSE:ACN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 79% Ownership, Accenture Plc (NYSE:ACN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

埃森哲公司(纽交所:ACN)拥有79%的股份,显示出强大的机构支持。
Simply Wall St ·  01/07 23:47

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Accenture implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构在埃森哲的持股量巨大,这意味着他们对公司股价有着重要影响。
  • 共有25位投资者拥有公司45%的股份。
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据帮助提供对股票机会的良好理解。

If you want to know who really controls Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了埃森哲有限公司(纽交所:ACN),那么你需要查看其股东名册的构成。 持有公司最多股份的群体,准确来说约占79%,是机构。 换句话说,这个群体从对公司的投资中将获得最多的收益(或遭受最多的损失)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构拥有大量资金和研究能力,机构持股在个别投资者中往往具有很大的影响力。因此,投资者在一家公司拥有相当数量的机构资金通常被视为一个可取的特征。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Accenture.

在下面的图表中,我们详细了解了埃森哲的不同股东群体。

big
NYSE:ACN Ownership Breakdown January 7th 2025
纽交所:ACN 所有权分解 2025年1月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Accenture?

机构所有权告诉我们关于Accenture什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

We can see that Accenture does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Accenture's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到埃森哲确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的相当一部分。这表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好对依赖于机构投资者的所谓验证保持警惕。他们有时也会出错。当多个机构共同持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会争相快速出售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到埃森哲的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是还有更多。

big
NYSE:ACN Earnings and Revenue Growth January 7th 2025
纽交所:埃森哲 2025年1月7日的收益和营业收入增长

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Accenture. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.6% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.0% and 4.4% of the stock.

机构投资者持有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可以强有力地影响董事会的决策。对冲基金在埃森哲的股份不多。根据我们的数据,最大股东是先锋集团,持有9.6%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约8.0%和4.4%的股票。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的股东数据进行更深入的分析显示,前25大股东总计持有的股份不足登记公司一半,表明存在一大批小股东,没有任何单一股东拥有多数股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构的持股是一种很好的方式,可以评估和筛选股票的预期表现。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,您可以很容易地查找预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of Accenture

Accenture的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Accenture plc in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$163m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的数据显示,内部人士以自己名义持有的埃森哲股份不足1%。作为一家大型公司,我们只期望内部人士持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他们持有价值16300万美元的股份。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Accenture. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众,通常是个人投资者,占有埃森哲21%的股份。虽然这个群体并不一定能决定公司的方向,但确实能对公司的运作产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他因素更为重要。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢深入了解一个公司过去的表现。您可以在这个详细的图表中找到历史营业收入和盈利。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发