Recent Uptick Might Appease COMPASS Pathways Plc (NASDAQ:CMPS) Institutional Owners After Losing 52% Over the Past Year
Recent Uptick Might Appease COMPASS Pathways Plc (NASDAQ:CMPS) Institutional Owners After Losing 52% Over the Past Year
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in COMPASS Pathways implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
- Insiders own 15% of COMPASS Pathways
- 機構在COMPASS Pathways的重大持股意味着他們對公司股價有顯著影響。
- 52%的業務由前9名股東持有。
- 內部人士擁有COMPASS Pathways 15%的股份。
If you want to know who really controls COMPASS Pathways plc (NASDAQ:CMPS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 29% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制COMPASS Pathways plc(納斯達克:CMPS),那麼你需要查看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有29%的絕對控制權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
After a year of 52% losses, last week's 27% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.
在經歷了52%的虧損的一年後,上週27%的漲幅對機構投資者來說可能是一個收益將開始上漲的跡象。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of COMPASS Pathways, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解COMPASS Pathways的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About COMPASS Pathways?
機構持股情況對我們了解 COMPASS Pathways 有什麼啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in COMPASS Pathways. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see COMPASS Pathways' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者在COMPASS Pathways中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師對這支股票進行了研究,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。當多家機構擁有同一支股票時,總是存在"擁擠交易"的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以看到COMPASS Pathways的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜。
It would appear that 13% of COMPASS Pathways shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is George Goldsmith, with ownership of 11%. With 10% and 7.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Atai Life Sciences N.V. and Citadel Advisors LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
看起來有13%的COMPASS Pathways股份由對沖基金控制。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,可能試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。公司的最大股東是喬治·戈德史密斯,持有11%的股份。 Atai Life Sciences N.V.和Citadel Advisors LLC分別持有10%和7.9%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。
We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,排名前9的股東佔據了股東名冊的過半數,少數小股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of COMPASS Pathways
COMPASS Pathways的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in COMPASS Pathways plc. It has a market capitalization of just US$304m, and insiders have US$47m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在COMPASS Pathways plc中保持着重要的持股。它的市值僅爲30400萬美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值4700萬美元的股票。我們可以說這表明與股東之間的利益一致,但值得注意的是,公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是公司的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over COMPASS Pathways. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆以25%的持股比例對COMPASS Pathways有一定的影響力,這個群體主要由個人投資者組成。儘管這個群體不能完全決定公司的運營,但確實可以對公司的運行產生真實的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 5.6%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
以5.6%的持股比例,股權投資公司在塑造企業策略方面有能力發揮作用,重點是價值創造。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓勵,因爲股權投資有時能夠推動策略,幫助市場看到公司的價值。另一方面,這些持有者可能在公司上市後選擇退出投資。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 10% of the COMPASS Pathways shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有COMPASS Pathways發行股份的10%。我們不能確定,但很有可能這是一種戰略性持股。這些業務可能相似,或者相互協作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for COMPASS Pathways (1 is potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有公司不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲關鍵。例如,我們發現COMPASS Pathways存在4個警告信號(其中一個可能比較嚴重!),在這裏投資之前你應該了解這些。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。