Noah Holdings Limited's (NYSE:NOAH) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Jingbo Wang Sees Holdings Value Fall by 7.6% Following Recent Drop
Noah Holdings Limited's (NYSE:NOAH) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Jingbo Wang Sees Holdings Value Fall by 7.6% Following Recent Drop
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Noah Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The top 5 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Noah Holdings is 29%
- 諾亞控股的高管持股表明對公司擴張有固有的利益
- 前五大股東擁有公司53%的股份。
- 諾亞控股的機構持股佔比爲29%
Every investor in Noah Holdings Limited (NYSE:NOAH) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 39% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位在諾亞控股有限公司(紐交所:NOAH)投資者都應意識到最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個人高管在公司中擁有39%的控股,這意味着這一群體在投資公司時可以獲得最多的收益(或承受最多的損失)。
As market cap fell to US$707m last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
由於市值上週降至70700萬美元,內部人士面臨的損失超過了公司其他股東群體。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Noah Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解諾亞財富的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Noah Holdings?
機構持股告訴我們關於諾亞財富什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Noah Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Noah Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在諾亞財富中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這一風險更高。您可以在下面看到諾亞財富的歷史營業收入,但請記住,背後總有更多的故事。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 10% of Noah Holdings. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Noah Holdings' case, its Top Key Executive, Jingbo Wang, is the largest shareholder, holding 21% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 10% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Zhe Yin is the owner of 5.2% of the company's shares.
我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有諾亞控股10%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金往往非常活躍且具有激進性。許多對沖基金尋找中期催化劑來推動股價上漲。因爲行動勝於言辭,我們認爲公司內部人士持有相當比例的股份是一種好兆頭。在諾亞控股的案例中,其最高管理層之一的王晶博是最大股東,持有21%的流通股份。爲了進一步說明,第二大股東大約持有10%的流通股份,而第三大股東持有9.2%。此外,首席執行官尹哲持有公司5.2%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了讓我們的研究更加有趣,我們發現前5大股東控制了公司超過一半的股份,這意味着這一群體在公司的決策中具有相當大的影響力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Noah Holdings
諾亞控股的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Noah Holdings Limited. Insiders own US$273m worth of shares in the US$707m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據表明,內幕人士擁有合理比例的諾亞控股有限公司股份。內幕人士在這家市值爲70700萬美元的公司中持有價值27300萬美元的股票。看到內幕人士如此投資於業務真是太好了。檢查一下這些內幕人士最近是否有買入動作可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有16%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。雖然這樣的持股規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以在公司政策上產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 5.2%, private equity firms could influence the Noah Holdings board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
憑藉5.2%的股份,股權投資公司有可能影響諾亞控股的董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲股權投資有時是激進者,他們讓管理層負責。但有時候,股權投資在公司上市後會選擇退出。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Noah Holdings has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
雖然考慮公司擁有者的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,風險 - 諾亞控股有1個我們認爲您應該注意的警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。