Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE:NSC) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 77% of the Company
Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE:NSC) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 77% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Norfolk Southern's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
- Insiders have bought recently
- 由於機構在股票中持有大量股份,諾福克南方的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 50%的業務由前24位股東持有
- 內部人士最近進行了買入。
A look at the shareholders of Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE:NSC) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看諾福克南方公司(紐交所:NSC)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有77%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲得最大的收益(或者如果出現下滑,則損失最大)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構能夠接觸到大量資金,他們的市場動作往往受到散戶或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,公司中擁有大量機構資金的投資通常被視爲一種可取的特質。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Norfolk Southern, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討諾福克南方每種類型的股東,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Norfolk Southern?
機構所有權告訴我們有關諾福克南方的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that Norfolk Southern does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Norfolk Southern, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到諾福克南方確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司相當大一部分的股票。這表明該公司在投資界有一定程度的可信度。然而,依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可是值得謹慎的。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看諾福克南方過去的盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Norfolk Southern. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.8%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and Dodge & Cox holds about 4.8% of the company stock.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司,因此他們可以集體發揮重要的影響力。 我們注意到對諾福克南方的對沖基金並沒有進行有意義的投資。 該公司的最大股東是先鋒集團,擁有8.8%的股份。 貝萊德是第二大股東,持有6.4%的普通股,而道奇與考克斯持有約4.8%的公司股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 24 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記,我們可以看到前24位股東控制了50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Norfolk Southern
諾福克南方的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Norfolk Southern Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$34m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據表明,內部人士在諾福克南方公司名下的持股不足1%。由於這是一個大型公司,我們只會期望內部人士擁有小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值3400萬美元的股票。可以說,近期的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Norfolk Southern. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆持有23%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,他們對諾福克南方公司有一定的影響力。這種持股規模雖然相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Norfolk Southern better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Norfolk Southern that you should be aware of.
考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解諾福克南方,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉例來說,我們已經識別出諾福克南方的2個警告信號,你需要引起注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。