Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Genuine Parts implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 22 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構在Genuine Parts的持股比例很大,這意味着他們對公司股價有顯著影響。
- 共有22位投資者在公司中持有50%的控股權
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
A look at the shareholders of Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看Genuine Parts Company(紐交所:GPC)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確來說約佔82%,是機構。換句話說,這個群體從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構投資者擁有巨大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,機構投資在公司中的佔比被普遍視爲積極特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Genuine Parts.
在下面的圖表中,我們詳細觀察了Genuine Parts的不同持股集團。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Genuine Parts?
機構持股告訴我們關於Genuine Parts什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Genuine Parts. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Genuine Parts' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所見,機構投資者在Genuine Parts中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明公司在投資圈中具有一定的信譽。然而,依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證最好保持謹慎。他們也有可能犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭快速售出股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Genuine Parts的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的背景。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Genuine Parts. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.6% by the third-largest shareholder.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對沖基金在Genuine Parts中的股份不多。先鋒集團目前是公司的最大股東,持有12%的流通股份。爲了作個對比,第二大股東持有約7.9%的流通股份,第三大股東持有5.6%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 22 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的深挖,我們發現前22名股東對公司的合計持股爲50%,這表明沒有任何單一股東對公司擁有顯著控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Genuine Parts
Genuine Parts的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Genuine Parts Company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$61m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人擁有Genuine Parts Company不到1%的股份。 這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人擁有公司較大比例的股份會讓人感到驚訝。儘管他們的持股不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員總共擁有價值6100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員擁有股票是好的,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆——包括零售投資者——在該公司擁有18%的股份,因此不可輕易忽視。 雖然這種所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Genuine Parts you should know about.
我發現研究誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。考慮風險,例如。每家公司都有風險,我們發現了關於Genuine Parts的一個警告信號,你應該知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。