share_log

With 90% Institutional Ownership, Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 90% Institutional Ownership, Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

在90%的机构持股下,Ecolab Inc.(纽交所:ECL)成为大腕们的热门选择
Simply Wall St ·  01/05 22:46

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ecolab's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 显著高的机构持有率意味着艺康集团的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
  • 营业收入的50%由前21大股东持有。
  • 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 90% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要想了解谁真正控制了艺康集团(纽交所:ECL),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的群体是持有90%股份的机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大化的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构拥有庞大的资金和研究能力,因此机构持股往往具有重要影响力,尤其是在个人投资者中。因此,投入一家公司大量资金的机构通常被视为积极属性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ecolab, beginning with the chart below.

让我们更深入地探讨艺康集团的每种所有者类型,首先看一下下面的图表。

big
NYSE:ECL Ownership Breakdown January 5th 2025
纽交所:ECL 所有权分布 2025年1月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ecolab?

机构所有权告诉我们关于艺康集团什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

We can see that Ecolab does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ecolab's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到艺康集团确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司大量的股票。这表明专业投资者之间有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构在同一时间对一只股票的看法发生变化,您可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得关注艺康集团的盈利历史。 当然,未来才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:ECL Earnings and Revenue Growth January 5th 2025
纽交所:ECL 2025年1月5日的营业收入和增长

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ecolab. Cascade Investment, L.L.C. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.9% of the company stock.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以共同施加显著的影响力。我们注意到对艺康集团的对冲基金没有实质性投资。Cascade Investment, L.L.C.目前是最大的股东,拥有10%的流通股。 Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股东,拥有8.5%的普通股,而贝莱德持有约7.9%的公司股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我们对所有权数据的深入分析表明,前21大股东的总持股达到50%,意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Ecolab

艺康集团的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Ecolab Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$65m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以其自身名义拥有艺康集团不足1%。由于艺康集团规模较大,我们不期望内部人士拥有大量股票。总的来说,他们持有6500万美元的股票。看到至少一些内部人士的持股总是好的,但值得检查一下这些内部人士是否有卖出股票的行为。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大众——包括散户投资者——在公司中拥有10%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Ecolab , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我发现查看究竟是谁拥有一家公司的信息非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 例如,永远存在的投资风险的阴影。 我们已经识别出艺康集团的1个警示信号,理解这些信号应该是您投资过程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发