Is Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s (NYSE:RCL) 36% ROE Better Than Average?
Is Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s (NYSE:RCL) 36% ROE Better Than Average?
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (NYSE:RCL).
我們可以做的最佳投資之一就是在自己的知識和技能上。考慮到這一點,本文將探討如何利用淨資產收益率(ROE)來更好地理解一項業務。通過實踐學習,我們將關注ROE,以更好地理解皇家加勒比郵輪有限公司(紐交所:RCL)。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.
ROE,即淨資產收益率,是評估公司如何有效地利用來自股東投資的工具。簡單來說,它用於評估公司相對於其股本的盈利能力。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股本回報率?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
ROE可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 凈利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Royal Caribbean Cruises is:
因此,基於上述公式,皇家加勒比郵輪的ROE爲:
36% = US$2.6b ÷ US$7.2b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
36% = 26億美金 ÷ 72億美金 (基於截至2024年9月的過去12個月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.36 in profit.
「收益」是過去十二個月中稅後所得的金額。可以這樣理解:對於每1美元的股東資本,公司賺取了0.36美元的利潤。
Does Royal Caribbean Cruises Have A Good ROE?
皇家加勒比郵輪ROE如何?
One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Royal Caribbean Cruises has a better ROE than the average (12%) in the Hospitality industry.
判斷一家公司的股本回報率是否良好的一個簡單方法是將其與行業的平均水平進行比較。 重要的是,這遠不是一個完美的衡量標準,因爲同一行業分類中的公司差異很大。 從下面的圖像可以清楚地看出,皇家加勒比郵輪的ROE好於酒店行業的平均水平(12%)。
That's what we like to see. However, bear in mind that a high ROE doesn't necessarily indicate efficient profit generation. Aside from changes in net income, a high ROE can also be the outcome of high debt relative to equity, which indicates risk. Our risks dashboardshould have the 3 risks we have identified for Royal Caribbean Cruises.
這正是我們想要看到的。 然而,請記住,高ROE並不一定表明有效的利潤生成。 除了凈利潤的變化,高ROE還可能是債務相對股本較高的結果,這表明存在風險。 我們的風險儀表板應包含我們爲皇家加勒比郵輪識別的3項風險。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
債務對ROE的影響是怎樣的?
Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.
公司通常需要投資資金來增長利潤。 投資的現金來源可以是前一年利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。在前兩種情況下,ROE將捕捉到這種使用資本增長的情況。在後一種情況下,債務的使用將提高回報,但不會改變股本。 通過這種方式,債務的使用將提升ROE,即使業務的核心經濟條件保持不變。
Combining Royal Caribbean Cruises' Debt And Its 36% Return On Equity
結合皇家加勒比郵輪的負債和其36%的ROE
Royal Caribbean Cruises does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 2.84. Its ROE is pretty impressive but, it would have probably been lower without the use of debt. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
皇家加勒比郵輪確實使用了大量負債來增加回報。它的債務與股本比率爲2.84。它的ROE相當可觀,但如果沒有使用負債,這個數字可能會更低。投資者應該認真考慮一家公司如果無法如此輕鬆地借款會如何表現,因爲信用市場會隨着時間改變。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
淨資產收益率對於比較不同企業的質量非常有用。能夠在沒有債務的情況下實現高淨資產收益率的公司可以被視爲高質量業務。如果兩家公司的債務與股本比率大致相同,而其中一家的ROE更高,我通常會更傾向於ROE更高的那家公司。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.
但是,當一項業務質量高時,市場通常將其價格炒得很高,這反映了這一點。考慮其他因素也很重要,例如未來利潤增長——以及未來需要多少投資。因此,您可能想查看這個免費的分析師預測可視化。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果你更願意查看另一家公司——一家潛在的財務狀況優秀的公司——那麼一定不要錯過這份有趣公司的免費列表,這些公司有高股本回報率和低負債。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。