Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Altimmune, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ALT) Recent US$56m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Altimmune, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ALT) Recent US$56m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Altimmune implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在Altimmune的重大持股意味着他們對公司的股價具有重要影響
- 前25大股東擁有公司47%的股份。
- 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Altimmune, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 56% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着Altimmune,Inc. (納斯達克:ALT),了解公司的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有56%的大部分股份。換句話說,機構在公司的投資中將獲得最多(或失去最多)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 9.9% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 38% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in Altimmune's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
機構投資者上週的持有價值下降了9.9%。這類投資者可能特別關心目前的損失,這爲股東增加了38%的年度損失。此外,這些被稱爲「聰明資金」的機構在股票價格變動上具有很大影響力。因此,如果Altimmune的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到被迫出售該股票,這對個人投資者來說可能並不理想。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Altimmune.
在下圖中,我們深入分析了Altimmune的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Altimmune?
機構所有權告訴我們有關Altimmune的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Altimmune does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Altimmune's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到Altimmune確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出錯誤投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,查看Altimmune的收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Altimmune. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.7% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.0% and 5.4% of the stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上,因此它們可以集體發揮重要的影響力。我們注意到對Altimmune對沖基金並沒有意義重大的投資。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大的股東,持有7.7%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約7.0%和5.4%的股票。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Altimmune
Altimmune的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that Altimmune, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It appears that the board holds about US$3.8m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of US$513m. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,Altimmune公司內部人士擁有不足1%的公司股份。董事會似乎持有大約380萬美元的股票。與51300萬美元的市值相比,許多較小公司的投資者更希望看到董事會有更重的投資。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有公司43%的股份,因此無法輕易被忽視。雖然這一群體不一定能決定公司的大事,但他們確實能對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Altimmune is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those can't be ignored...
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。要注意,Altimmune在我們的投資分析中顯示出4個警告信號,其中1個是不可忽視的……
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。