M/I Homes (NYSE:MHO) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
M/I Homes (NYSE:MHO) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies M/I Homes, Inc. (NYSE:MHO) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
大衛·伊本說得很好,'波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免永久性資本損失。' 所以,當你考慮任何股票的風險時,考慮債務可能是顯而易見的,因爲過多的債務會讓公司陷入困境。和許多其他公司一樣,MI 家居公司(紐交所:MHO)也使用了債務。但股東應該擔心其債務的使用嗎?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時會變得危險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無法償還其貸款方,則它在貸款方的掌控之中。資本主義的一個重要組成部分是「創造性毀滅」的過程,失敗的企業被銀行家毫不留情地清算。然而,一個更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久稀釋股東的股份,僅僅是爲了穩住其資產負債表。當然,債務可以是企業中一個重要的工具,特別是對資本密集型企業。當我們審視債務水平時,首先考慮現金和債務水平的結合。
What Is M/I Homes's Net Debt?
MI 家居的淨債務是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2024 M/I Homes had debt of US$930.1m, up from US$894.0m in one year. However, it also had US$723.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$207.1m.
下面的圖像可以點擊以獲得更多細節,顯示到2024年9月,MI 家居的債務爲93010萬美元,比一年前的89400萬美元有所增加。 然而,它的現金爲72300萬美元,因此其淨債務爲20710萬美元。
How Healthy Is M/I Homes' Balance Sheet?
MI 家居的資產負債表健康嗎?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that M/I Homes had liabilities of US$538.7m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.08b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$723.0m and US$66.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$825.1m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
從最新的資產負債表可以看出,MI 家居有 53870萬美元的負債將在一年內到期,外加 10.8億美元的長期負債。另一方面,它擁有 72300萬美元的現金和價值 6640萬美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收款的總和多出 82510萬美元。
M/I Homes has a market capitalization of US$3.60b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.
MI 家居的市值爲 36億美元,因此在需要時,很可能能夠籌集資金來改善其資產負債表。但顯然,我們應該密切審視它是否能在不稀釋的情況下管理其債務。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們通過查看公司的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比例來衡量公司相對於其收益能力的債務負擔,以及計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋利息支出的能力(利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們在考慮收益時同時考慮了折舊與攤銷費用及不考慮這些費用的情況。
M/I Homes has net debt of just 0.31 times EBITDA, suggesting it could ramp leverage without breaking a sweat. And remarkably, despite having net debt, it actually received more in interest over the last twelve months than it had to pay. So it's fair to say it can handle debt like a hotshot teppanyaki chef handles cooking. Fortunately, M/I Homes grew its EBIT by 7.6% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine M/I Homes's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
MI 家居的淨債務僅爲 EBITDA 的 0.31 倍,這表明它可以在不費力的情況下增加槓桿。而且值得注意的是,儘管有淨債務,過去 12 個月它實際上收到的利息比支付的還要多。因此可以公平地說,它能像一名出色的鐵板燒廚師處理烹飪一樣處理債務。幸運的是,MI 家居在過去一年中其 EBIt 增長了 7.6%,使得債務負擔看起來更加可控。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到了大部分關於債務的信息。但未來的收益比任何其他因素都更加關鍵,這將判斷 MI 家居在未來是否能維持健康的資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, M/I Homes's free cash flow amounted to 43% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,公司只能用現金償還債務,而不是會計利潤。因此,我們始終檢查 EBIt 中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,MI 家居的自由現金流佔其 EBIt 的 43%,低於我們的預期。這種現金轉換能力較弱使得處理債務更加困難。
Our View
我們的觀點
The good news is that M/I Homes's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that M/I Homes can handle its debt fairly comfortably. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with M/I Homes , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
好消息是MI 家居展示了用EBIT覆蓋利息支出的能力,這讓我們像毛茸茸的小狗讓幼兒高興一樣欣喜。而且好消息並不止於此,因爲它的淨債務與EBITDA的比例也支持了這種印象!綜合考慮上述所有因素,我們認爲MI 家居能夠相對輕鬆地處理其債務。好的一面是,這種槓桿可以提升股東回報,但潛在的缺點是損失風險更大,因此值得關注資產負債表。當您分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的領域。但最終,任何公司都有可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。我們已識別出MI 家居的一個警告信號,理解這些應該是您投資過程的一部分。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
最終,通常更好的是關注沒有淨負債的公司。你可以訪問我們特別列出這些公司的名單(所有公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。