share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Amplitude, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMPL) Recent 4.3% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Amplitude, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMPL) Recent 4.3% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

隨着AMPLitude, Inc.(納斯達克:AMPL)最近下跌4.3%,機構投資者可能會採取重大行動,增加一年以來的損失。
Simply Wall St ·  01/01 19:20

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Amplitude implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 54% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Insiders own 14% of Amplitude
  • 機構在Amplitude的大量持股意味着它們對公司股價有 significant influence。
  • 前9大股東持有54%的業務。
  • 內部人士持有Amplitude 14%的股份。

Every investor in Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每位AMPLitude, Inc.(納斯達克:AMPL)的投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。持有最大份額的群體是機構,擁有52%的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$60m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 16% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Amplitude which might hurt individual investors.

因此,上週機構投資者承受了最高的損失,因爲市值下降了6000萬美元。這一最新損失,加上股東一年的損失達到16%,可能會讓這一群體的投資者感到不快。通常被稱爲「市場推動者」,機構在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有顯著的權力。因此,如果這種下降繼續,機構投資者可能會被迫賣出Amplitude,這可能會傷害到散戶投資者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Amplitude.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Amplitude的哪些信息。

big
NasdaqCM:AMPL Ownership Breakdown January 1st 2025
納斯達克CM:AMPL 2025年1月1日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amplitude?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Amplitude的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

We can see that Amplitude does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Amplitude's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Amplitude確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅憑這一事實就依賴,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在他們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Amplitude的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的內容。

big
NasdaqCM:AMPL Earnings and Revenue Growth January 1st 2025
納斯達克CM:AMPL 盈利和營業收入增長 2025年1月1日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Amplitude is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Sequoia Capital Operations LLC with 8.0% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Spenser Skates, the CEO has 5.0% of the shares allocated to their name.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可以共同強有力地影響董事會的決策。Amplitude並不被對沖基金擁有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是紅杉資本運營有限責任公司,持有8.0%的流通股份。相比之下,第二大股東持有約6.8%的流通股份,第三大股東持有6.5%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官斯賓塞·斯凱茨名下擁有5.0%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,排名前9的股東佔據了股東名冊的過半數,少數小股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。

Insider Ownership Of Amplitude

Amplitude的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Amplitude, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.3b, and insiders have US$191m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看起來內部人員擁有Amplitude, Inc.的相當大部分股份。它的市值僅爲13億美金,內部人士持有價值19100萬美金的股票。這是相當顯著的。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望訪問這張免費圖表,查看內部人士近期的交易。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Amplitude. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆, 通常是個人投資者, 持有Amplitude 20%的股份。雖然這一所有權的規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Amplitude. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有Amplitude 14%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這種情況,因爲私募股權有時是積極的股東,會對管理層進行問責。但有時候,私募股權則是出賣股份,讓公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Amplitude (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司不同群體是很有價值的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經識別出Amplitude的3個警告信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂),您需要注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論