Palladyne AI Corp.'s (NASDAQ:PDYN) Market Cap up US$252m Last Week, Benefiting Both Individual Investors Who Own 55% as Well as Insiders
Palladyne AI Corp.'s (NASDAQ:PDYN) Market Cap up US$252m Last Week, Benefiting Both Individual Investors Who Own 55% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Palladyne AI's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 44% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- Palladyne AI的大量個人投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到來自公衆股東的影響。
- 前25名股東持有該業務44%的股份。
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Palladyne AI Corp. (NASDAQ:PDYN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 55% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正掌控Palladyne AI CORP.(納斯達克:PDYN),理解業務的持股結構非常重要。公司中持有最多股份的群體,大約佔55%,是個人投資者。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下行風險)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched US$401m last week, while insiders who own 30% also benefitted.
個人投資者在市值達到40100萬美元后獲得了最多的收益,而持有30%的內部人員也獲益了。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Palladyne AI.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Palladyne人工智能的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Palladyne AI?
機構持股對Palladyne人工智能的影響是什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Palladyne AI does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Palladyne AI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到Palladyne人工智能確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看Palladyne人工智能的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Palladyne AI is not owned by hedge funds. William Kerber is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.0% of shares outstanding. Marc Olivier is the second largest shareholder owning 5.8% of common stock, and Fraser Smith holds about 5.4% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Benjamin Wolff, the CEO has 2.6% of the shares allocated to their name.
Palladyne人工智能並不爲對沖基金所擁有。威廉·凱伯目前是公司最大的股東,持有8.0%的流通股份。馬克·奧利維爾是第二大股東,擁有5.8%的普通股,弗雷澤·史密斯持有約5.4%的公司股票。此外,我們發現首席執行官本傑明·沃爾夫名下分配有2.6%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,這意味着公司的股份分散廣泛,沒有主導股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。了解分析師情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。根據我們所了解,目前沒有關於該公司的分析師覆蓋,因此它可能正在被忽視。
Insider Ownership Of Palladyne AI
Palladyne 人工智能的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Palladyne AI Corp.. Insiders own US$122m worth of shares in the US$401m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在Palladyne人工智能公司持有相當大的股份。內部人士在這家市值爲40100萬美元的公司中擁有12200萬美元的股份。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是該公司的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 55% of Palladyne AI. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有Palladyne人工智能55%的股份。這種所有權水平使更廣泛的公衆投資者在影響關鍵政策決策(如董事會構成、高管薪酬和股息支付比例)方面擁有一定的權力。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 5.6% of Palladyne AI stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
上市公司目前持有Palladyne AI股票的5.6%。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。也許它們已經分拆。這一持股很可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Palladyne AI you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit unpleasant.
我發現研究公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。舉個例子:我們發現了4個需要注意的Palladyne AI的警告信號,其中有2個稍顯不愉快。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這可能不是買入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我們免費的有趣前景集合,擁有良好的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。