share_log

Ispire Technology Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ISPR) Last Week's 16% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

Ispire Technology Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ISPR) Last Week's 16% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

Ispire科技公司(納斯達克:ISPR)上週16%的下跌一定讓持有重要股份的私人公司感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/31 19:26

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significant control over Ispire Technology by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Pride Worldwide Investment Limited with a 59% stake
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 私營公司對Ispire科技的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策中擁有更大的影響力。
  • 該公司的最大股東是Pride Worldwide Investment Limited,持有59%的股份。
  • 公司的過往表現以及所有權數據有助於強烈判斷業務的前景

A look at the shareholders of Ispire Technology Inc. (NASDAQ:ISPR) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

觀察Ispire科技公司(納斯達克:ISPR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約59%,是私營公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大的收益(或者在下跌時將遭受最大的損失)。

And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 16%.

上週,私營公司遭受了最大的損失,股票下跌了16%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ispire Technology.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Ispire科技的信息。

big
NasdaqCM:ISPR Ownership Breakdown December 31st 2024
納斯達克CM:ISPR 股權分佈 2024年12月31日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ispire Technology?

機構持股對Ispire Technology的意義是什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

We can see that Ispire Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ispire Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Ispire科技確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司很大一部分的股票。這在專業投資者中暗示了某種可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時對一隻股票改變看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Ispire科技的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:ISPR Earnings and Revenue Growth December 31st 2024
納斯達克CM:ISPR 在2024年12月31日的盈利和營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ispire Technology. Our data shows that Pride Worldwide Investment Limited is the largest shareholder with 59% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.4% and 2.7% of the stock.

對沖基金在Ispire科技中的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,Pride Worldwide Investment Limited是最大的股東,持有59%的流通股。由於在公司中擁有如此巨大的股份,我們推測他們對公司未來有重要控制權。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約4.4%和2.7%的股票。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒也同樣重要,以了解風向如何。儘管有一定的分析師覆蓋,但這家公司可能並沒有被廣泛報道。因此它在未來可能會獲得更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Ispire Technology

Ispire Technology 的內部人士持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Ispire Technology Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$20m worth of stock in the US$298m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有Ispire Technology Inc.的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有價值2000萬美元的股票,而該公司總值爲29800萬美元。看到內部人士有一些投資是好事,但也許值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司擁有26%的股份,因此他們的存在不可忽視。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以左右政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 59%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有所發行股票的59%。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私人公司的股份而對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人的身份。雖然很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是一個進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ispire Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Ispire Technology (1 doesn't sit too well with us) that you should be aware of.

考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體始終是值得的。但爲了更好地理解Ispire科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們已經識別出Ispire科技的2個警告信號(其中1個讓我們感到不安),你應該注意這些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論