share_log

Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 55% of the Company

Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 55% of the Company

奧羅拉創新公司(納斯達克:AUR)受到持有55%股份的機構投資者的青睞
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/30 19:41

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Aurora Innovation's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 顯著的高機構持股意味着Aurora Innovation的股票價格對他們的交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有5位投資者在公司中擁有52%的控股權。
  • 內部人士最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看Aurora Innovation, Inc. (納斯達克:AUR)的股東可以讓我們知道哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有絕大部分股份,持股比例爲55%。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構投資者擁有巨大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,機構投資在公司中的佔比被普遍視爲積極特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Aurora Innovation.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Aurora Innovation的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:AUR Ownership Breakdown December 30th 2024
納斯達克GS:AUR 所有權分佈 2024年12月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Aurora Innovation?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Aurora Innovation什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Aurora Innovation. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Aurora Innovation's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Aurora Innovation中擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在它們在一個「擁擠的交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到Aurora Innovation的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總有更多的內容。

big
NasdaqGS:AUR Earnings and Revenue Growth December 30th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:AUR 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月30日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Aurora Innovation. Our data shows that Uber Technologies, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Christopher Urmson holds about 8.5% of the company stock. Christopher Urmson, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以共同發揮重要的影響力。對Aurora Innovation來說,對沖基金的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,優步科技公司是最大股東,持有19%的流通股。普信集團是第二大股東,持有13%的普通股,而Christopher Urmson持有約8.5%的公司股票。作爲第三大股東的Christopher Urmson,還擔任董事會主席的職務。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了讓我們的研究更加有趣,我們發現前5大股東控制了公司超過一半的股份,這意味着這一群體在公司的決策中具有相當大的影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Aurora Innovation

Aurora Innovation的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Aurora Innovation, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$12b, and insiders have US$1.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看來內部人士擁有Aurora Innovation, Inc.的相當大比例股份。它的市值僅爲120億美元,而內部人士名下的股份價值爲16億美元。這相當可觀。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們共同投資。您可能希望訪問這張免費的圖表,查看內部人士最近的交易。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Aurora Innovation. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公共投資者擁有10%的股份,主要由個體投資者組成,他們對Aurora Innovation有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不一定能夠決定一切,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 21% of the Aurora Innovation shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有21%的Aurora Innovation流通股份。這可能是戰略利益,並且這兩家公司可能有相關的業務關係。它們可能已經進行過分拆。這個持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Aurora Innovation you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 舉個例子:我們發現Aurora Innovation有4個警示信號 您應該注意,其中1個不容忽視。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論