Great Week for Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA) Institutional Investors After Losing 4.5% Over the Previous Year
Great Week for Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA) Institutional Investors After Losing 4.5% Over the Previous Year
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Liquidia's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Liquidia is 11%
- 顯著的高機構持有意味着Liquidia的股票價格對其交易行爲敏感。
- 51%的業務由前8名股東持有
- Liquidia的內部持有比例爲11%。
If you want to know who really controls Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制了Liquidia公司(納斯達克:LQDA),您就必須查看其股份登記的組成。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確來說約爲45%,是機構。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該群體將受益最多(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 8.9% increase in the share price after a year of 4.5% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲8.9%的消息,因在過去一年中股價損失達到4.5%,這表明回報可能開始上升。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Liquidia.
在下面的圖表中,我們關注Liquidia的不同持有群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Liquidia?
機構持有權對Liquidia有什麼影響?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Liquidia. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Liquidia's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Liquidia中持有相當可觀的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好謹慎對待依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構共同持有一隻股票時,永遠存在他們可能處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會爭先恐後地賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Liquidia的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜。
It would appear that 9.6% of Liquidia shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Caligan Partners, LP, with ownership of 9.6%. The second and third largest shareholders are Patient Square Capital, LP and Legend Aggregator Advisors, LLC, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 8.5%. Furthermore, CEO Roger Jeffs is the owner of 2.4% of the company's shares.
看起來9.6%的Liquidia股份由對沖基金控制。這一點值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。該公司的最大股東是Caligan Partners, LP,持有9.6%的股份。第二和第三大股東是Patient Square Capital, LP和Legend Aggregator Advisors, LLC,持有相等數量的股份,各爲8.5%。此外,首席執行官Roger Jeffs持有公司2.4%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了更多的挖掘,發現前8大股東大約佔登記的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Liquidia
Liquidia的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Liquidia Corporation. Insiders have a US$104m stake in this US$976m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
看起來內部人士持有Liquidia公司的相當大比例股份。內部人士在這家97000萬美元的業務中擁有10400萬美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量的股票。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆——包括零售投資者——在該公司擁有18%的股份,因此不可輕易忽視。 雖然這種所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 8.5% stake in Liquidia. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股權投資公司持有Liquidia 8.5%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。有時我們看到股權投資公司會長期投資,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,而且正如其名,他們通常不會大量投資於上市公司。經過一段時間後,他們可能會選擇出售並將資金重新部署到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 8.5%, of the Liquidia stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
看起來私營公司持有Liquidia股票的8.5%。僅憑這一事實很難得出結論,因此值得調查一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他相關方可能通過一個獨立的私營公司對上市公司的股份有興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Liquidia is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我發現了解到底是誰擁有一家公司的情況非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,Liquidia在我們的投資分析中顯示出一個警告信號,您應該了解……
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。