share_log

Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 89% of the Company

Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 89% of the Company

伍德沃德公司(纳斯达克:WWD)在很大程度上由持有89%公司股份的机构股东控制。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/26 03:20

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Woodward's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 由于机构在股票中的大额持股,伍德沃德的股价可能会受到他们的交易决策的影响。
  • 前十大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
  • 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景

A look at the shareholders of Woodward, Inc. (NASDAQ:WWD) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看伍德沃德公司(纳斯达克:WWD)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体是最强大的。机构持有89%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群体。换句话说,该群体从对公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考虑到他们掌握的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有重要影响力,特别是在个人投资者中。因此,投资于公司的大部分机构资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任投票。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Woodward.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于伍德沃德的不同持股群体。

big
NasdaqGS:WWD Ownership Breakdown December 25th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:WWD 持股结构 2024年12月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Woodward?

机构持有情况对伍德沃德有什么启示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

We can see that Woodward does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Woodward's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,伍德沃德确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好对依赖仅凭机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持警惕。他们也有可能犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个参与方可能会争相快速出售股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到伍德沃德的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是还有更多的故事。

big
NasdaqGS:WWD Earnings and Revenue Growth December 25th 2024
纳斯达克:伍德沃德 2024年12月25日的收益和营业收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Woodward is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 9.8%. With 9.6% and 8.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Eagle Capital Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。 伍德沃德并不被对冲基金所拥有。 公司的最大股东是贝莱德,持有9.8%。 先锋集团和鹰资本管理公司的持股比例分别为9.6%和8.0%,是第二和第三大股东。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了一些深入研究,发现十大股东约占股东名册的51%,这意味着除了大股东,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Woodward

伍德沃德的内部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人士的定义可能是主观的,并在不同法域之间有所不同。我们的数据显示个人内部人士,至少捕获了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身就是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Woodward, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$17m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人士持有伍德沃德公司的股份不到1%。由于这是一个大公司,我们只会预期内部人士拥有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值1700万美元的股份。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样重要。您可以点击此处查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Woodward. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有10%股份的一般公众,主要由个人投资者构成,对伍德沃德有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不一定能主导决策,但肯定能对公司的运营产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Woodward better, we need to consider many other factors.

始终值得考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体。但要更好地理解伍德沃德,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

许多人发现深入分析公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问这一详细的历史营业收入、营业收入和现金流的图表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

译文内容由第三方软件翻译。


以上内容仅用作资讯或教育之目的,不构成与富途相关的任何投资建议。富途竭力但不能保证上述全部内容的真实性、准确性和原创性。
    抢沙发