share_log

Standard BioTools Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LAB) Latest 17% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Standard BioTools Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LAB) Latest 17% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

標準生物工具公司 (納斯達克:LAB) 最新的17%下跌使一年損失進一步加劇,機構投資者可能考慮採取 drastic measures。
Simply Wall St ·  01:18

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Standard BioTools' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着標準生物工具公司的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
  • 共有4名投資者在公司中擁有51%的控股權
  • 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景

Every investor in Standard BioTools Inc. (NASDAQ:LAB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每個標準生物工具公司(納斯達克:LAB)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東集團。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有52%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的收益(或者在下跌時損失最多)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 17% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 14% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Standard BioTools which might hurt individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了17%。 不用說,最近的損失進一步增加了股東一年的14%的損失,可能不太容易被這一類股東接受。 機構或"流動性提供者"控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股票價格波動有很大的影響。 因此,如果下跌持續,機構投資者可能會面臨賣出標準生物工具的壓力,這可能會傷害到個人投資者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Standard BioTools.

在下圖中,我們聚焦於標準生物工具的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:LAB Ownership Breakdown December 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:LAb 所有權分解 2024年12月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Standard BioTools?

機構所有權告訴我們關於標準生物工具什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Standard BioTools. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Standard BioTools' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在標準生物工具中擁有相當的股份。 這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。然而,對於依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證,最好還是保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是有風險,他們處於『擁擠的交易』中。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。 在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到標準生物工具的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是還有更多的故事。

big
NasdaqGS:LAB Earnings and Revenue Growth December 25th 2024
納斯達克GS:LAb 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 16% of Standard BioTools. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Casdin Capital, LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 19% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 16% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 11% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以一起強有力地影響董事會決策。我們的數據顯示對沖基金擁有標準生物工具16%的股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。Casdin Capital, LLC目前是最大的股東,持有19%的流通股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有大約16%的流通股份,其次是第三大股東持有11%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了大約51%的公司由前四大股東控制,這表明這些股東對業務有顯著影響力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Standard BioTools

標準生物工具的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Standard BioTools Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$681m, and insiders have US$9.5m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東可能會對內部人員持有標準生物工具公司的股份感興趣。這家公司市值僅爲68100萬美元,而內部人員擁有價值950萬美元的股票。這至少顯示了一定程度的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Standard BioTools. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有標準生物工具公司12%的股份。儘管這一持股比例相當可觀,但可能不足以在決策與其他大股東不一致的情況下改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 19% stake in Standard BioTools. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股權投資公司持有Standard BioTools 19%的股份。這表明它們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。某些投資者可能會因這一點受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵幫助市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有者可能會在公司上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Standard BioTools better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Standard BioTools (including 1 which is potentially serious) .

始終值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地理解Standard BioTools,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該學習我們發現的關於Standard BioTools的2個警告信號(其中1個可能是嚴重的)。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論