Here's Why We Think Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) Is Well Worth Watching
Here's Why We Think Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) Is Well Worth Watching
It's common for many investors, especially those who are inexperienced, to buy shares in companies with a good story even if these companies are loss-making. Sometimes these stories can cloud the minds of investors, leading them to invest with their emotions rather than on the merit of good company fundamentals. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad.
許多投資者,尤其是那些沒有經驗的投資者,常常購買故事好的公司的股票,即使這些公司是虧損的。有時,這些故事會影響投資者的思維,使他們情感投資,而不是基於公司基本面的良好表現。虧損公司的資金就像海綿一樣吸引資本,因此投資者應該謹慎,以免把好錢投入壞項目。
So if this idea of high risk and high reward doesn't suit, you might be more interested in profitable, growing companies, like Oracle (NYSE:ORCL). Even if this company is fairly valued by the market, investors would agree that generating consistent profits will continue to provide Oracle with the means to add long-term value to shareholders.
所以,如果這種高風險高回報的理念不適合你,你可能更喜歡諸如甲骨文(紐交所:ORCL)這樣的盈利增長公司。即使這家公司在市場上被合理定價,投資者也會同意,持續產生穩定的利潤將繼續爲甲骨文提供使股東增值的手段。
How Quickly Is Oracle Increasing Earnings Per Share?
甲骨文每股收益的增長速度有多快?
The market is a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term, so you'd expect share price to follow earnings per share (EPS) outcomes eventually. That makes EPS growth an attractive quality for any company. Over the last three years, Oracle has grown EPS by 4.4% per year. While that sort of growth rate isn't anything to write home about, it does show the business is growing.
市場在短期內是投票機,但在長期內是稱重機,因此你可以預期股價最終會跟隨每股收益(每股收益)的結果。這使得每股收益的增長成爲任何公司的一個吸引人的品質。在過去三年中,甲骨文的每股收益年增長率爲4.4%。雖然這種增長率不算特別出色,但確實顯示了業務在成長。
Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. Oracle shareholders can take confidence from the fact that EBIT margins are up from 29% to 31%, and revenue is growing. That's great to see, on both counts.
仔細考慮營業收入增長和利息及稅前利潤(EBIT)利潤率可以幫助我們了解最近利潤增長的可持續性。甲骨文的股東可以從EBIT利潤率從29%上升到31%以及營業收入增長的事實中獲得信心。這在兩方面都是很好的消息。
You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers.
你可以查看下面圖表中公司的營業收入和盈利增長趨勢。點擊圖表以查看確切的數字。
You don't drive with your eyes on the rear-view mirror, so you might be more interested in this free report showing analyst forecasts for Oracle's future profits.
您不會把目光放在後視鏡上開車,因此您可能更感興趣於這份免費報告,報告中顯示了分析師對甲骨文未來利潤的預期。
Are Oracle Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?
甲骨文內部人士是否與所有股東一致?
Theory would suggest that it's an encouraging sign to see high insider ownership of a company, since it ties company performance directly to the financial success of its management. So those who are interested in Oracle will be delighted to know that insiders have shown their belief, holding a large proportion of the company's shares. Owning 41% of the company, insiders have plenty riding on the performance of the the share price. Shareholders and speculators should be reassured by this kind of alignment, as it suggests the business will be run for the benefit of shareholders. US$198b That level of investment from insiders is nothing to sneeze at.
理論上,看到公司內部人士高比例持股是一個令人鼓舞的跡象,因爲這將公司業績與管理層的財務成功直接聯繫起來。所以,感興趣於甲骨文的人會高興地看到內部人士持有公司相當大比例的股份。內部人士擁有41%的公司股份,他們在股價表現上有很大押注。股東和投機者應該對這種一致性感到放心,因爲這表明業務將爲股東的利益而經營。1980億美金,內部人士的投資水平不可小覷。
While it's always good to see some strong conviction in the company from insiders through heavy investment, it's also important for shareholders to ask if management compensation policies are reasonable. Well, based on the CEO pay, you'd argue that they are indeed. The median total compensation for CEOs of companies similar in size to Oracle, with market caps over US$8.0b, is around US$13m.
雖然看到內部人士通過大量投資表現出對公司的強烈信心總是好事,但股東也應問管理層薪酬政策是否合理。根據CEO的薪資,您會認爲它們確實合理。甲骨文類似規模公司的CEO的中位數總薪酬,市值超過80億美金,約爲1300萬美金。
Oracle's CEO took home a total compensation package worth US$6.5m in the year leading up to May 2024. That seems pretty reasonable, especially given it's below the median for similar sized companies. While the level of CEO compensation shouldn't be the biggest factor in how the company is viewed, modest remuneration is a positive, because it suggests that the board keeps shareholder interests in mind. Generally, arguments can be made that reasonable pay levels attest to good decision-making.
甲骨文的CEO在2024年5月前一年獲得了價值650萬美元的總薪酬包。這似乎相當合理,特別是考慮到這個數字低於類似規模公司的中位數。雖然CEO薪酬水平不應該是評價公司時最大的因素,但適度的薪酬是一個積極信號,因爲這表明董事會關注股東利益。一般而言,可以說合理的薪酬水平證明了良好的決策。
Should You Add Oracle To Your Watchlist?
你應該把甲骨文加入你的自選嗎?
One important encouraging feature of Oracle is that it is growing profits. Earnings growth might be the main attraction for Oracle, but the fun does not stop there. With a meaningful level of insider ownership, and reasonable CEO pay, a reasonable mind might conclude that this is one stock worth watching. Even so, be aware that Oracle is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
甲骨文的一個重要優勢是其利潤在增長。每股收益的增長可能是甲骨文的主要吸引力,但這還不是全部。憑藉着相對較高的內部持股比例和合理的CEO薪酬,一個理智的人可能會得出結論,這是一個值得關注的股票。儘管如此,請注意,甲骨文在我們的投資分析中顯示出一個警告信號,你需要了解...
There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings.
總是有可能通過購買未能增長收益且沒有內部人士購買股份的股票而獲得良好回報。但對於那些認爲這些指標重要的人,我們鼓勵你關注那些具有這些特徵的公司。你可以訪問一份定製的公司列表,這些公司已經展示出由重要內部持股支持的增長。
Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.
請注意,本文討論的內部交易是指在相關管轄區內可報告的交易。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。