With 1.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) 4.9% Stock Price Decline
With 1.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) 4.9% Stock Price Decline
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Independent Bank's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 由於機構在股票中的大額持倉,美國獨立銀行的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 前11大股東持有公司50%的股份。
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
A look at the shareholders of Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 82% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看美國獨立銀行CORP(納斯達克:INDB)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有最大份額的是機構,擁有82%的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體能夠獲得最多的收益(或者在下跌時損失最多)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 4.9% in value last week. However, the 1.3% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧損,尤其是那些上週看到其持有股份價值下降4.9%的機構投資者。然而,1.3%的年回報可能幫助減輕了他們的痛苦。然而,他們應該意識到未來可能會有進一步的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Independent Bank.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於美國獨立銀行的不同股東群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於美國獨立銀行?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
We can see that Independent Bank does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Independent Bank's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到美國獨立銀行確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一大部分。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有同一只股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。如果在一家沒有成長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到美國獨立銀行的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住往往還有更多的故事。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Independent Bank. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強有力地影響董事會決策。我們注意到對美國獨立銀行的對沖基金沒有重大投資。該公司的最大股東是貝萊德公司,持有15%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有12%和5.4%的流通股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地看我們的所有權數字,前11大股東的綜合持股比例爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構的持股是一種很好的方式,可以評估和篩選股票的預期表現。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,您可以很容易地查找預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank
美國獨立銀行的內部人持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能具有主觀性,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終需要對董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或CEO的情況下。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Independent Bank Corp. in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$23m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士自名下持有美國獨立銀行CORP不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有2300萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在該公司擁有17%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體並不一定能決定大局,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
許多人發現深入分析公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問這一詳細的歷史營業收入、營業收入和現金流的圖表。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。