Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:BWMN) Recent 13% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:BWMN) Recent 13% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Bowman Consulting Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders own 19% of Bowman Consulting Group
- 機構在Bowman Consulting Group的重大持股意味着他們對公司股票價格有顯著影響。
- 共有7名投資者擁有該公司的控股權,持有51%的股份
- 內部人士擁有Bowman Consulting Group 19%的股份。
Every investor in Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ:BWMN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 58% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.(納斯達克:BWMN)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東團體。機構持有58%的股份,是公司最大股份的擁有者。換句話說,該團體在對公司投資中獲利或虧損的可能性最大。
And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 13% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 31% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Bowman Consulting Group which might hurt individual investors.
在公司股價上週下跌13%後,機構投資者經歷了最高的損失。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的損失,這使得股東過去一年的損失增加到了31%。這些被稱爲「聰明錢」的機構對股票價格的變動具有很大的影響力。因此,如果下跌持續,機構投資者可能會被迫出售博曼諮詢集團的股票,這可能會傷害到個人投資者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Bowman Consulting Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解博曼諮詢集團的每一種所有者類型,從下圖開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bowman Consulting Group?
機構持有告訴我們關於博曼諮詢集團什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Bowman Consulting Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bowman Consulting Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
博曼諮詢集團已經在股東名冊上有機構參與。實際上,他們在公司中擁有很可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在它們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭迅速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以查看博曼諮詢集團的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,總有更多的故事。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Bowman Consulting Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is FMR LLC with 16% of shares outstanding. With 13% and 8.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Gary Bowman and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Gary Bowman, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司,因此他們可以共同掌握重要的權力。 我們注意到對Bowman Consulting Group的對沖基金投資並不明顯。 查看我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是FMR LLC,持有16%的流通股。 加里·鮑曼和貝萊德公司分別持有13%和8.6%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。 第二大股東加里·鮑曼恰好也是首席執行官。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步檢查發現,公司的七大股東持有超過一半的股份,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上與小股東的利益保持平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司機構的所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的看法也同樣重要,以了解市場的動態。很多分析師關注這隻股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Bowman Consulting Group
Bowman Consulting Group的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然對內幕人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內幕人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時候高層管理者自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.. Insiders have a US$82m stake in this US$428m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.中保持了大量股份。內部人士持有這家售價爲4億2800萬美元的業務中8200萬美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股票。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有該公司23%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種股份的規模可能不足以左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Bowman Consulting Group you should know about.
我發現查看誰具體擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。考慮風險,比如說。每家公司都有風險,我們發現了一個關於博曼諮詢集團的警告信號,你應該知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。