Resideo Technologies (NYSE:REZI) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Resideo Technologies (NYSE:REZI) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Resideo Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:REZI) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
禾倫·巴菲特曾 famously 說過,『波動性遠非與風險同義。』所以,當你考慮某個股票的風險時,考慮債務可能是顯而易見的,因爲過多的債務可能會讓公司陷入困境。與許多其他公司一樣,Resideo Technologies, Inc.(紐交所:REZI)也利用債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否讓公司變得風險重重。
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務帶來風險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還時,才會成爲真正的問題,不論是通過籌集資金還是用自己的現金流。在最糟糕的情況下,如果公司無法償還其債權人,就可能破產。雖然這並不常見,但我們經常會看到負債公司因貸方強迫它們在低價籌集資金而永久稀釋股東權益。話雖如此,最常見的情況是,一家公司合理地管理其債務,並將其作爲自己優勢。考慮到一家公司使用多少債務時,第一件要做的事就是查看其現金和債務的整體狀況。
How Much Debt Does Resideo Technologies Carry?
Resideo Technologies 擁有多少債務?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at September 2024 Resideo Technologies had debt of US$2.00b, up from US$1.41b in one year. On the flip side, it has US$544.0m in cash leading to net debt of about US$1.45b.
以下圖片可以點擊以獲取更多細節,顯示到2024年9月,Resideo Technologies 擁有債務20億美元,比一年之前的14.1億美元有所增加。另一方面,它擁有54400萬美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲14.5億美元。
A Look At Resideo Technologies' Liabilities
關注Resideo Technologies的負債
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Resideo Technologies had liabilities of US$1.67b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.11b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$544.0m and US$1.10b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$3.13b.
從最新的資產負債表來看,Resideo Technologies有負債16.7億美元將在一年內到期,31.1億美元的負債將在其後到期。另一方面,它有54400萬美元的現金和價值11億美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債超過了其現金和(近期)應收賬款的總和31.3億美元。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$3.60b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
這相較於其36億美元的市值來說是一山的槓桿。這表明,如果公司需要迅速增強其資產負債表,股東將遭受嚴重稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。
With a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.1, Resideo Technologies uses debt artfully but responsibly. And the alluring interest cover (EBIT of 8.3 times interest expense) certainly does not do anything to dispel this impression. Sadly, Resideo Technologies's EBIT actually dropped 5.7% in the last year. If that earnings trend continues then its debt load will grow heavy like the heart of a polar bear watching its sole cub. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Resideo Technologies can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Resideo Technologies的負債與 EBITDA 比率爲2.1,巧妙但負責任地使用債務。迷人的利息覆蓋率(EBIT是利息支出的8.3倍)無疑沒有消除這種印象。可悲的是,Resideo Technologies的EBIT在過去一年實際上下降了5.7%。如果這個收益趨勢持續下去,它的債務負擔將像北極熊看着它唯一的幼崽那樣沉重。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上了解關於債務的更多信息。但最終,未來業務的盈利能力將決定Resideo Technologies是否能隨着時間的推移強化其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這個關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Resideo Technologies recorded free cash flow of 37% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,一家公司只能用冷硬現金,而非會計利潤來償還債務。因此,我們總是檢查EBIT中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。查看最近三年,Resideo Technologies的自由現金流佔EBIT的37%,這比我們預期的要弱。當涉及到償還債務時,這並不理想。
Our View
我們的觀點
At the end of the day, we're far from enamoured with Resideo Technologies's ability to handle its total liabilities or to grow its EBIT. But the silver lining is its relatively strong interest cover. Once we consider all the factors above, together, it seems to us that Resideo Technologies's debt is making it a bit risky. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but we'd generally feel more comfortable with less leverage. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Resideo Technologies is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
在一天結束時,我們對Resideo Technologies處理其總負債的能力或提升其EBIT的能力並不太滿意。 但值得注意的是,它的利息覆蓋率相對較強。 一旦考慮到上述所有因素,我們認爲Resideo Technologies的債務使其有些風險。這並不一定是壞事,但我們通常會覺得如果槓桿率較低會更舒適。 當分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的領域。但歸根結底,每家公司都可能存在資產負債表以外的風險。 請注意,Resideo Technologies在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警告信號,您應該了解...
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
最終,通常更好的是關注沒有淨負債的公司。你可以訪問我們特別列出這些公司的名單(所有公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。