share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Royal Gold, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RGLD) Recent US$863m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Royal Gold, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RGLD) Recent US$863m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

機構投資者可能會忽視皇家黃金公司(納斯達克:RGLD)最近的86300萬美元市值下跌,因爲長期收益仍然積極。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/22 22:38

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Royal Gold's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構持股比例顯著較高意味着皇家黃金的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感
  • 52%的業務由最大的7位股東持有
  • 內部人士最近出售了股票。

If you want to know who really controls Royal Gold, Inc. (NASDAQ:RGLD), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制皇家黃金公司(納斯達克:RGLD),那麼您需要查看其股東登記的構成。持有最大份額的群體是擁有87%股份的機構。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 8.9% in value last week. However, the 11% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧損,特別是那些上週看到其持股價值下降8.9%的機構投資者。然而,給股東的11%年度回報可能會緩解這種打擊。不過,我們可以假設,他們會對未來的弱點保持警惕。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Royal Gold, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究皇家黃金每種類型的股東,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:RGLD Ownership Breakdown December 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:RGLD 所有權分解 2024年12月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Royal Gold?

機構持股對我們了解皇家黃金有什麼啓示?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

Royal Gold already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Royal Gold, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

皇家黃金的股東名冊上已經有了機構。事實上,他們在公司中持有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構也會像其他人一樣做出糟糕的投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時出售股票,看到股價大幅下跌是很常見的。因此,檢查皇家黃金過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:RGLD Earnings and Revenue Growth December 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:RGLD 2024年12月22日的盈利和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Royal Gold. Our data shows that Capital Research and Management Company is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 10.0% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體擁有顯著的權力。對沖基金在皇家黃金中沒有很多股份。我們的數據顯示,資本研究與管理公司是最大股東,持有13%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約10%和10.0%的股票。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步檢查發現,公司的七大股東持有超過一半的股份,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上與小股東的利益保持平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Royal Gold

皇家黃金的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Royal Gold, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$28m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士持有皇家黃金公司不到1%的股份。由於公司規模較大,我們不希望內部人士持有大量股票。總體來看,他們持有價值2800萬美元的股票。看到至少一些內部人士的持股總是好的,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在出售股份。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Royal Gold. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆持有13%的股份,主要由個體投資者組成,對皇家黃金有一定的影響力。雖然這一群體不一定能夠掌控大局,但他們確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Royal Gold better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但是要更好地理解皇家黃金,我們需要考慮其他許多因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡深入了解一個公司過去的表現。您可以在這個詳細的圖表中找到歷史營業收入和盈利。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論