Trustmark Corporation's (NASDAQ:TRMK) Institutional Investors Lost 4.9% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Trustmark Corporation's (NASDAQ:TRMK) Institutional Investors Lost 4.9% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Trustmark implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在Trustmark的 substantial holdings 表明他們對公司股票價格有重要影響。
- 共有7名投資者擁有該公司的控股權,持有51%的股份
- 內部人士最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Trustmark Corporation (NASDAQ:TRMK) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 78% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看Trustmark Corporation (納斯達克:TRMK) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有公司最多股票的群體,大約78%,也就是機構。如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大利益(或者在下滑時損失最大)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.9% last week. However, the 33% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
投資虧損是所有股東都不願意經歷的,尤其是上週其持有價值下跌了4.9%的機構投資者。然而,33%的年回報率可能在一定程度上緩解了他們的整體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失持謹慎態度。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Trustmark, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Trustmark的每種所有者類型,首先是下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trustmark?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Trustmark什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Trustmark does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Trustmark's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到Trustmark確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師查看了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的觀點,股票價格可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Trustmark的歷史盈利記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Trustmark is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 6.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體施加重大影響力。Trustmark並不被對沖基金持有。貝萊德目前是公司的最大股東,持有15%的流通股份。先鋒集團和多維基金顧問分別持有11%和6.7%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步檢查發現,公司的七大股東持有超過一半的股份,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上與小股東的利益保持平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究一家公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增值,同時研究分析師的建議也是一個很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。 目前有相當數量的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Trustmark
Trustmark的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Trustmark Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$35m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以報告內部人士確實擁有Trustmark公司的股票。 這是一個大公司,因此看到這種程度的對齊是件好事。內部人士擁有價值3500萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士有這種程度的投資是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否最近進行了買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在這家公司中擁有20%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這種股權規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Trustmark better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Trustmark that you should be aware of before investing here.
始終考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體是值得的。但要更好地理解Trustmark,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們發現了3個Trustmark的警告信號,在您投資之前應該了解這些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。