Institutional Investors May Overlook Grab Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:GRAB) Recent US$926m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Institutional Investors May Overlook Grab Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:GRAB) Recent US$926m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Grab Holdings' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 高度的機構持有意味着Grab Holdings的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 共有12位投資者持有公司51%的大多數股份。
- 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據幫助提供對股票機會的良好理解。
A look at the shareholders of Grab Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:GRAB) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
觀察Grab Holdings Limited(納斯達克:GRAB)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有公司最多股份的群體,精確來說約爲42%,是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最多收益(如果出現下跌則損失最多)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$926m last week. However, the 52% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
機構投資者在公司市值上週下降92600萬美元后遭受了最高的損失。然而,52%的年回報率可能有助於緩解他們的整體損失。不過,他們仍然應該注意未來可能出現的進一步損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Grab Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討Grab Holdings的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Grab Holdings?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Grab Holdings的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Grab Holdings. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Grab Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Grab Holdings中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好還是要小心依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並非罕見。因此,查看Grab Holdings過去的收益軌跡是值得的(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Grab Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Uber Technologies, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. With 10.0% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, SB Investment Advisers (UK) Limited and Toyota Motor Corporation are the second and third largest shareholders.
Grab Holdings並不被對沖基金持有。根據我們的數據,最大股東是優步科技公司,持有13%的流通股。Sb Investment Advisers (UK) Limited和豐田汽車公司分別持有10.0%和5.5%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東註冊,我們可以看到前12大股東控制了51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of Grab Holdings
Grab Holdings的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Grab Holdings Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$605m. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告內部人士確實持有Grab Holdings Limited的股票。內部人士持有價值60500萬美元的相當可觀的股份。大多數人會說這表明股東與董事會之間的利益高度一致。不過,值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在賣出股票。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Grab Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆以23%的持有比例,主要由個人投資者組成,對Grab Holdings有一定的影響力。這種持有比例雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 10.0%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
在擁有10.0%的股權的情況下,股權投資公司有能力在關注價值創造的前提下,參與塑造企業策略。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲股權投資有時是會對管理層進行問責的積極分子。但有時,股權投資也會選擇退出,尤其是在公司上市後。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 22% of Grab Holdings stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
目前公共公司持有Grab Holdings 22%的股票。很難確定,但這表明他們有交織的商業利益。這可能是一種戰略性股份,因此值得關注這一領域的股權變動。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Grab Holdings that you should be aware of before investing here.
我發現了解具體擁有一家公司的人是誰非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現Grab Holdings有一個你在投資前應該注意的警告信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。