Institutional Investors May Overlook Datadog, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:DDOG) Recent US$3.3b Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Institutional Investors May Overlook Datadog, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:DDOG) Recent US$3.3b Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Datadog's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 48% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 考慮到機構在股票中所佔的大量股份,Datadog的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
- 前25大股東持有該公司48%的股份。
- 內部人士最近一直在賣出。
If you want to know who really controls Datadog, Inc. (NASDAQ:DDOG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制了Datadog, Inc.(納斯達克:DDOG),那麼您需要查看其股權登記的構成。 持有公司最多股份的群體,大約75%,就是機構。 換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多的收益(或承受最多的損失)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 6.3% in value last week. However, the 20% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧損,特別是機構投資者,他們上週看到持股價值下降了6.3%。然而,20%的年度回報可能幫助減輕了他們的總體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Datadog, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解Datadog的每種所有者類型,從下方的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Datadog?
機構持股情況能告訴我們關於Datadog的什麼信息
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Datadog. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Datadog's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Datadog中擁有相當的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已查看了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們可能也是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於"擁擠交易"的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Datadog的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是還有更多。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Datadog. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.1% and 2.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Olivier Pomel, the CEO has 2.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有公司的超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體擁有顯著的權力。我們注意到對Datadog的對沖基金沒有進行重大投資。先鋒集團目前是公司的最大股東,持有8.9%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有6.1%和2.8%的流通股。此外,我們發現CEO奧利維耶·波梅爾( Olivier Pomel)名下擁有2.5%的股份。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Datadog
Datadog的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Datadog, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$3.9b worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.
股東可能會對內部人士持有Datadog, Inc.的股份感興趣。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員集體持有價值39億美金的股份(按當前價格計算)。我們有時對他們是否在買入或賣出感興趣。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Datadog. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆投資者通常持有Datadog 18%的股份。雖然這群人並不一定能左右決策,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Datadog has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我發現了解誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正深入了解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮風險 - Datadog有2個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。