The Three-year Underlying Earnings Growth at Ball (NYSE:BALL) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time
The Three-year Underlying Earnings Growth at Ball (NYSE:BALL) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time
For many investors, the main point of stock picking is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But the risk of stock picking is that you will likely buy under-performing companies. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Ball Corporation (NYSE:BALL) shareholders, since the share price is down 38% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 22%. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 17% in the last 90 days.
對許多投資者來說,選股的主要目的是產生高於整體市場的回報。但選股的風險在於你可能會購買表現不佳的公司。不幸的是,對於長期的巴爾公司(紐交所:BALL)股東來說,這種情況確實存在,因爲在過去三年中,股價下跌了38%,遠低於市場約22%的收益。股東們最近的經歷更加糟糕,股價在過去90天中下跌了17%。
With the stock having lost 4.5% in the past week, it's worth taking a look at business performance and seeing if there's any red flags.
在過去一週股票下跌了4.5%的情況下,值得關注一下業務表現,看看是否存在任何警示信號。
While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.
儘管有效市場假說仍然被一些人教授,但已經證明市場是一種反應過度的動態系統,投資者並不總是理性。通過比較每股收益(EPS)和股價變化,我們可以感受到投資者對公司的態度在一段時間內是如何變化的。
During the unfortunate three years of share price decline, Ball actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 0.7% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.
在這三年不幸的股價下跌期間,巴爾公司的每股收益(EPS)實際上每年改善了0.7%。鑑於股價反應,人們可能會懷疑EPS在此期間並不是判斷業務表現的好指標(可能是由於一次性的損失或收益)。另一種可能是,過去的增長預期可能是不切實際的。
It looks to us like the market was probably too optimistic around growth three years ago. Looking to other metrics might better explain the share price change.
在我們看來,市場在三年前可能對增長過於樂觀。查看其他指標可能更能解釋股價變化。
With a rather small yield of just 1.4% we doubt that the stock's share price is based on its dividend. The company has kept revenue pretty healthy over the last three years, so we doubt that explains the falling share price. We're not entirely sure why the share price is dropped, but it does seem likely investors have become less optimistic about the business.
由於收益率僅爲1.4%,我們懷疑股票的股價是基於其分紅派息。 公司在過去三年保持了相對健康的營業收入,因此我們懷疑這並不能解釋股價下跌的原因。 我們不完全確定股價下跌的原因,但投資者似乎對這項業務變得不那麼樂觀。
The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下面的圖表顯示了收益和營收隨時間的變化情況(通過單擊圖像揭示確切的值)。
We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Even so, future earnings will be far more important to whether current shareholders make money. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on Ball
我們認爲,在過去一年中內部聯繫人進行了 significant 購買這是積極的。 即便如此,未來的盈利對當前股東是否賺錢將更爲重要。 這份展示分析師預測的免費報告應能幫助您對Ball形成看法。
What About Dividends?
關於分紅派息的問題
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, Ball's TSR for the last 3 years was -36%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
在考慮任何特定股票時,考慮總股東回報和股價回報是重要的。 股價回報僅反映股價變化,而總股東回報包括分紅的價值(假設分紅被再投資)和任何折價融資或分拆的收益。 可以公平地說,總股東回報爲支付分紅的股票提供了更全面的圖景。 事實上,Ball在過去3年的總股東回報爲-36%,這超過了之前提到的股價回報。 這在很大程度上是由於其分紅派息的結果!
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
While the broader market gained around 24% in the last year, Ball shareholders lost 1.2% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. However, the loss over the last year isn't as bad as the 1.9% per annum loss investors have suffered over the last half decade. We would want clear information suggesting the company will grow, before taking the view that the share price will stabilize. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks, for example - Ball has 3 warning signs (and 2 which are potentially serious) we think you should know about.
雖然在過去一年中整體市場上漲了約24%,但Ball的股東卻損失了1.2%(即使包括分紅派息在內)。即使是好股票的股價有時也會下跌,但在過於關注之前,我們希望看到業務的基本指標有改善。然而,過去一年的損失並沒有過去五年投資者每年1.9%的損失那麼嚴重。在我們認爲股價將穩定之前,我們希望看到明確的信息表明公司將會增長。雖然考慮市場條件對股價的不同影響非常值得,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,風險 - Ball有3個警告信號(其中2個可能是嚴重的)我們認爲你應該了解。
There are plenty of other companies that have insiders buying up shares. You probably do not want to miss this free list of undervalued small cap companies that insiders are buying.
還有很多其他公司內部人士正在買入股票。你可能不想錯過這份內部人士正在購買的被低估的小盤公司的免費名單。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在美國交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。