Here's What To Make Of Electronic Arts' (NASDAQ:EA) Decelerating Rates Of Return
Here's What To Make Of Electronic Arts' (NASDAQ:EA) Decelerating Rates Of Return
What are the early trends we should look for to identify a stock that could multiply in value over the long term? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. In light of that, when we looked at Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled.
我們應該關注哪些早期趨勢,以識別那些長期內可能增值的股票?一種常見的方法是尋找資本回報率(ROCE)不斷增加的公司,同時伴隨資本投入的增長。如果你看到這種情況,通常意味着這是一傢具有良好商業模式和充足盈利再投資機會的公司。因此,當我們查看電子藝電(納斯達克:EA)及其ROCE趨勢時,並不是特別激動。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本回報率(ROCE):它是什麼?
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Electronic Arts:
對於那些不清楚ROCE是什麼的人來說,它衡量的是公司從其投入資本中可以產生的稅前利潤。分析師使用以下公式來計算電子藝電的ROCE:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)
0.15 = US$1.5b ÷ (US$13b - US$2.8b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.15 = 15億 ÷ (130億 - 28億) (基於截至2024年9月的過去12個月數據)。
Therefore, Electronic Arts has an ROCE of 15%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 10% generated by the Entertainment industry.
因此,電子藝電的ROCE爲15%。單獨來看,這是一項標準的回報,但比娛樂行業產生的10%要好得多。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Electronic Arts compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Electronic Arts .
上面您可以看到電子藝術公司當前的資本回報率與其過去的資本回報率的比較,但從過去您只能了解到有限的信息。如果您有興趣,可以在我們爲電子藝術公司提供的免費分析師報告中查看分析師的預測。
How Are Returns Trending?
回報率的趨勢如何?
There hasn't been much to report for Electronic Arts' returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at Electronic Arts in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger.
電子藝術公司的回報和所用資本的情況沒有太多值得彙報的,因爲這兩個指標在過去五年裏一直保持穩定。當我們觀察一個成熟且穩定且沒有再投資其收益的業務時,這種情況並不罕見,因爲它可能已經過了商業週期的那個階段。因此,除非我們看到電子藝術公司的資本回報率和額外投資方面發生實質性變化,否則我們不會對它成爲一個多倍收益的公司抱有期待。
In Conclusion...
結論...
In a nutshell, Electronic Arts has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. And investors may be recognizing these trends since the stock has only returned a total of 40% to shareholders over the last five years. Therefore, if you're looking for a multi-bagger, we'd propose looking at other options.
簡而言之,電子藝術公司在過去五年裏以相同的資本獲得相同的回報。投資者可能已經意識到這些趨勢,因爲在過去五年中,股票僅給股東帶來了40%的總回報。因此,如果您在尋找多倍收益的投資,我們建議您看看其他的選擇。
If you're still interested in Electronic Arts it's worth checking out our FREE intrinsic value approximation for EA to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects.
如果您仍然對電子藝術公司感興趣,查看我們免費的電子藝術內在價值估算是值得的,以了解其在其他方面是否以吸引人的價格交易。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想尋找具有良好收益的穩健公司,可以查看這份擁有良好資產負債表和令人印象深刻的股本回報率的免費公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。