share_log

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LXRX) After 24% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LXRX) After 24% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

投資於萊斯康製藥公司的股權投資公司經歷了痛苦的一週(納斯達克:LXRX),在24%的下跌之後,機構也遭受了損失。
Simply Wall St ·  12/20 02:15

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Lexicon Pharmaceuticals' significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 2 shareholders own 62% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals is 33%
  • 萊斯康製藥的股權投資公司顯著持股表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 前兩大股東持有公司62%的股份
  • 萊斯康製藥的機構持股比例爲33%。

Every investor in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:LXRX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 48% stake, private equity firms possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每個萊斯康製藥公司(納斯達克:LXRX)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。股權投資公司擁有48%的股份,是公司最大股東。換句話說,該集團在對公司的投資中,面臨最大的收益(或損失)。

While institutions, who own 33% shares weren't spared from last week's US$77m market cap drop, private equity firms as a group suffered the maximum losses

雖然擁有33%股份的機構在上週7700萬美元的市值下跌中未能倖免,但股權投資公司作爲一個整體遭受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解萊斯康製藥的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:LXRX Ownership Breakdown December 19th 2024
納斯達克GS:LXRX 所有權分佈 2024年12月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lexicon Pharmaceuticals?

機構持有情況告訴我們萊斯康製藥什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lexicon Pharmaceuticals' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

萊斯康製藥已經在股東名冊上有機構股份。確實,他們在公司的股份相當可觀。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持謹慎。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看萊斯康製藥的歷史營業收入是值得的。當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:LXRX Earnings and Revenue Growth December 19th 2024
納斯達克GS:LXRX 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月19日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. Our data shows that Artal Group S.A. is the largest shareholder with 48% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 3.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

對沖基金在萊斯康製藥的持股不多。我們的數據表明,Artal集團是最大股東,擁有48%的流通股票。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有14%和3.0%的流通股票。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩大股東在公司中擁有大多數股權,這意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals

萊斯康製藥的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$3.1m worth of the US$265m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有萊斯康製藥公司的部分股份。作爲個人,內部人士集體擁有310萬美金的股份,而該公司的市值爲26500萬美金。看到內部人士進行一些投資是好事,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司17%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 48%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

以48%的股權,股權投資公司有能力在專注於價值創造的同時,參與塑造企業策略。有些人可能對此喜歡,因爲股權投資有時是持不同政見者,能夠讓管理層負責。但在其他情況下,股權投資則是選擇退出,已經將公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lexicon Pharmaceuticals better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Lexicon Pharmaceuticals is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is concerning...

考慮到持有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解萊斯康製藥,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,萊斯康製藥在我們的投資分析中顯示出4個警告信號,其中1個是令人擔憂的...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論