We Think Hershey (NYSE:HSY) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
We Think Hershey (NYSE:HSY) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that The Hershey Company (NYSE:HSY) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
傳奇基金經理李路(查理·芒格支持)曾說過:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性資本損失。」 所以,聰明的錢知道,債務——通常與破產有關——是評估公司風險時一個非常重要的因素。我們注意到,好時公司(紐交所:HSY)的資產負債表上確實有債務。那麼,股東是否應該擔心它的債務使用?
When Is Debt A Problem?
何時債務成爲問題?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還時才會成爲真正的問題,要麼通過融資要麼通過自身的自由現金流。最終,如果公司無法履行其法律義務還債,股東可能會一無所獲。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們確實經常看到負債累累的公司由於貸方迫使他們以低價融資而永久稀釋股東權益。不過,通過替代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資於增長的企業的一個極好的工具。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要查看其現金和債務的組合。
How Much Debt Does Hershey Carry?
好時公司負債有多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, Hershey had US$5.22b of debt, up from US$4.84b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$615.0m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$4.60b.
如您所見,在2024年9月底,好時公司的債務達到52.2億美金,高於一年前的48.4億美金。點擊圖片獲取更多詳情。不過,它有61500萬的現金抵消這部分債務,導致淨債務約爲46億美金。
How Strong Is Hershey's Balance Sheet?
好時的資產負債表有多強?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Hershey had liabilities of US$4.20b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$4.22b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$615.0m in cash and US$1.14b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$6.66b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
根據最近報告的資產負債表,好時有42億美元的負債在12個月內到期,以及42.2億美元的負債在12個月後到期。相抵的是,它有61500萬美元的現金和11.4億美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出66.6億美元。
Given Hershey has a humongous market capitalization of US$35.9b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
考慮到好時擁有359億美元的巨額市值,很難相信這些負債會構成多大的威脅。話雖如此,顯然我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以防其情況惡化。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們通過查看公司的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比例來衡量公司相對於其收益能力的債務負擔,以及計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋利息支出的能力(利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們在考慮收益時同時考慮了折舊與攤銷費用及不考慮這些費用的情況。
We'd say that Hershey's moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 1.6), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its commanding EBIT of 15.3 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. But the other side of the story is that Hershey saw its EBIT decline by 3.4% over the last year. That sort of decline, if sustained, will obviously make debt harder to handle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Hershey can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
我們認爲好時適度的淨債務與EBITDA比率(爲1.6)表明在債務方面的謹慎。而其EBIT是利息支出的15.3倍,意味着債務負擔如孔雀羽毛般輕。但事情的另一面是好時在過去一年中EBIT下降了3.4%。如果這種下降持續下去,顯然會使債務更難處理。當分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個明確的起點。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定好時是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想了解專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份有關分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Hershey recorded free cash flow worth 69% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,雖然稅務機關可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸方只接受冷硬現金。因此,檢查這些EBIT有多少是由自由現金流支持的非常重要。在最近三年中,好時記錄的自由現金流佔其EBIT的69%,這一比例大約是正常的,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅。這些自由現金流使公司在適當時能夠很好地償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Hershey's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its EBIT growth rate. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that Hershey can handle its debt fairly comfortably. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example - Hershey has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
令人欣慰的是,好時的出色利息覆蓋比率意味着它在債務方面佔據優勢。 但從更嚴肅的角度來看,我們對它的EBIT增長率有些擔憂。 看看所有上述因素,我們認爲好時可以相對輕鬆地應對其債務。 從積極的方面來看,這種槓桿可以提升股東回報,但潛在的 downside 是更高的損失風險,因此監控資產負債表是值得的。 毋庸置疑,我們對債務的了解大多來自資產負債表。 但最終,每個公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。 例如 - 好時有 1 個我們認爲您應該注意的警示信號。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
最終,通常更好的是關注沒有淨負債的公司。你可以訪問我們特別列出這些公司的名單(所有公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。