Institutional Investors in Bandwidth Inc. (NASDAQ:BAND) See US$59m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Institutional Investors in Bandwidth Inc. (NASDAQ:BAND) See US$59m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Bandwidth implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構在Bandwidth的重大持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重要影響
- 51%的業務由前15大股東持有
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
Every investor in Bandwidth Inc. (NASDAQ:BAND) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 70% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位在Bandwidth Inc.(納斯達克:BAND)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。擁有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔70%,就是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現下跌,他們將損失最多)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 11% last week. Still, the 39% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
投資虧損是所有股東都不喜歡的事情,特別是那些上週看到其持有的價值下降了11%的機構投資者。不過,39%的年增幅可能幫助減輕了他們的整體損失。然而,他們應該注意未來可能出現的進一步損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Bandwidth, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Bandwidth的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bandwidth?
機構持股告訴我們有關bandwidth的情況
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Bandwidth already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Bandwidth, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Bandwidth已經在其股東名冊上有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中持有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像所有人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時出售股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看Bandwidth過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(如下所示)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Bandwidth. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.2% of common stock, and Henry Kaestner holds about 5.0% of the company stock. In addition, we found that David Morken, the CEO has 0.6% of the shares allocated to their name.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同擁有顯著的權力。對Bandwidth而言,對沖基金並沒有持有很多股份。我們的數據表明,貝萊德公司是最大股東,持有11%的流通股份。先鋒集團公司是第二大股東,擁有6.2%的普通股,而亨利·凱斯特納持有約5.0%的公司股票。此外,我們發現首席執行官大衛·摩爾肯持有0.6%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到51%的股份由前15大股東控制,這意味着沒有任何單一股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是合理的,但研究分析師意見也很有意義,以了解趨勢如何。相當多的分析師覆蓋了這隻股票,因此你可以很輕鬆地查看預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Bandwidth
bandwidth的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Bandwidth Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$43m worth of stock in the US$527m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會很感興趣地了解,內部人士在Bandwidth Inc.中擁有股票。在他們自己的名下,內部人士在這家價值52700萬美元的公司中擁有價值4300萬美元的股票。有些人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性。但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在賣出股票。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中擁有18%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這個群體不一定能做出決定,但他們肯定能對公司運行產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.0%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司4.0%的股份。單憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下這些私人公司的所有者。有時,內部人士或其他相關方通過一個單獨的私人公司對公共公司的股份有興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Bandwidth better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Bandwidth .
了解一家公司的股東結構總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地理解Bandwidth,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意到我們發現的Bandwidth的一個警示信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。