In the Wake of D.R. Horton, Inc.'s (NYSE:DHI) Latest US$3.3b Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions
In the Wake of D.R. Horton, Inc.'s (NYSE:DHI) Latest US$3.3b Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in D.R. Horton implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在霍頓房屋的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響。
- 業務的50%由前17位股東持有。
- 內部人士最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of D.R. Horton, Inc. (NYSE:DHI) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看霍頓房屋公司(紐交所:DHI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最有權勢。 持有公司最多股份的集團,約佔83%,是機構。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 6.6% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 1.5% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in D.R. Horton's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了6.6%。最近的虧損,加上股東一年內虧損的1.5%,可能讓這一群體的投資者感到不滿。機構通常被稱爲「市場推動者」,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有顯著的權力。因此,如果霍頓房屋的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會覺得有必要賣出該股票,這對個人投資者來說可能並不是理想的選擇。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of D.R. Horton, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們更深入地探討霍頓房屋每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About D.R. Horton?
機構投資的持股情況對霍頓房屋有何影響?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in D.R. Horton. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of D.R. Horton, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所見,機構投資者在霍頓房屋中佔有相當的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,依靠機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證還是要小心。他們有時也會出現錯誤。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時出售某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並非罕見。因此,查看霍頓房屋過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,記住還要考慮其他因素。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in D.R. Horton. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此他們可以共同發揮重要的影響力。對沖基金在霍頓房屋的股份不多。先鋒集團目前是最大股東,擁有11%的流通股份。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有大約9.6%的流通股份,第三大股東持有6.5%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細地看一下我們的股權數據,前17大股東的合計持股達到50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有絕對控股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of D.R. Horton
霍頓房屋的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in D.R. Horton, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$492m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以報告,內幕人士確實持有霍頓房屋公司的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共同持有價值49200萬美元的股份(以當前價格計算)。看到這種投資水平真是令人欣慰。您可以在這裏查看這些內幕人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in D.R. Horton. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有霍頓房屋公司15%的股份。雖然這種規模的持股可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand D.R. Horton better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解霍頓房屋,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄。您也可以通過訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營業收入和收益的免費圖表來查看。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。