share_log

BCE Stock or Rogers Stock: Are Either a Smart Buy for Canadians?

BCE Stock or Rogers Stock: Are Either a Smart Buy for Canadians?

BCE股票或羅傑斯股票:對加拿大人來說,哪個更值得買入?
The Motley Fool ·  12/18 04:45

BCE (TSX:BCE) and Rogers Communications (TSX:RCI.B) are two titans of Canada's telecom industry. Both offering intriguing opportunities for investors, depending on their priorities. Deciding which is the better buy requires a deep dive into recent earnings, dividend reliability, debt burdens, and the broader market landscape. Each company presents a unique value proposition, but also its share of risks.

BCE(TSX:BCE)和羅傑斯通信(TSX:RCI.B)是加拿大電信行業的兩大巨頭。兩者都爲投資者提供了有趣的機會,這取決於他們的優先事項。決定哪個更值得買入需要深入分析近期的收益、分紅派息可靠性、債務負擔以及更廣泛的市場環境。每家公司都提供獨特的價值主張,但也都面臨各自的風險。

Recent earnings

近期收益

BCE stock recently reported net income of $604 million for the third quarter of 2024, a remarkable 52.1% jump from the same period last year. Despite this, revenue fell by 1.8% year-over-year to $5.97 billion, reflecting challenges in maintaining growth amid a competitive market. While BCE stock's cost-cutting initiatives have helped shore up profitability, the drop in revenue signals that the company faces hurdles in driving consistent top-line expansion. This duality of improving earnings but weakening revenue presents a mixed outlook for potential investors.

BCE股票最近報告2024年第三季度的淨利潤爲60400萬,較去年同期大幅增長52.1%。儘管如此,營業收入同比下降1.8%至59.7億,反映出在競爭激烈的市場環境中維持增長的挑戰。雖然BCE股票的成本削減措施幫助提升了盈利能力,但營業收入的下降表明公司在推動持續的營收擴展方面面臨困難。收益提升與營業收入減弱的雙重特點爲潛在投資者呈現了混合的前景。

Rogers, meanwhile, added 101,000 postpaid wireless subscribers in its latest quarter but fell short of analysts' expectations of 129,040. Even so, the company reported adjusted earnings per share of $1.42, beating estimates of $1.35. Its media segment was a standout, with revenue climbing 11% due to strong demand for sports-related content. This diversification into media has proven to be a smart strategic move. Yet, Rogers' relatively modest revenue increase of 0.7% year-over-year indicates some of the same challenges facing the sector as a whole.

與此同時,羅傑斯在最近一季度新增了101,000名後付費無線訂閱用戶數,但未能達到分析師129,040的預期。儘管如此,該公司報告的調整後每股收益爲1.42美元,超過了1.35美元的預期。其媒體部門表現突出,營業收入因對體育相關內容的強勁需求而增長11%。該公司向媒體的多樣化擴展證明是一個明智的策略。然而,羅傑斯相對溫和的營業收入同比增長0.7%表明,該板塊整體面臨的一些相同挑戰。

Fundamentals

基本面

Dividends are a major factor for investors in these established companies. BCE stock boasts an eye-popping yield of 10.8%, which is undoubtedly attractive for income-focused investors. However, the sustainability of such a high payout is questionable, given that its payout ratio currently sits at an alarming 4,400%. This suggests BCE is paying out far more than it earns, raising concerns about how long this trend can continue. On the other hand, Rogers offers a more modest dividend yield of 4.1%, but with a much healthier payout ratio of 70.7%. This leaves room for reinvestment and long-term dividend stability, a factor that may appeal more to conservative investors.

分紅派息是這些成熟公司投資者的重要因素。BCE的股票收益率高達10.8%,這對注重收入的投資者無疑具有吸引力。然而,考慮到其派息比率目前高達驚人的4,400%,這種高額派息的可持續性令人質疑。這表明BCE支付的金額遠遠超過其收益,這引發了人們對這種趨勢能夠持續多久的擔憂。另一方面,羅傑斯提供的分紅派息收益率較爲溫和,爲4.1%,但它的派息比率健康得多,爲70.7%。這爲再投資和長期分紅派息穩定性留下了空間,這一因素可能更吸引保守型投資者。

Debt levels are another critical consideration, especially in a capital-intensive industry like telecom. BCE stock's total debt of $40.1 billion results in a debt-to-equity ratio of 222.9%, which is significant but not uncommon in this sector. The company's operating cash flow of $7.5 billion provides some reassurance that it can manage this debt load. Yet the margin for error remains thin.

債務水平是另一個關鍵考慮因素,尤其是在像電信這樣的資本密集型行業。BCE股票總債務爲401億,債務與股本比率爲222.9%,這雖然重要,但在該行業並不罕見。公司的運營現金流爲75億,這在一定程度上提供了能夠管理這筆債務的保證。然而,犯錯的餘地仍然很小。

Rogers, by comparison, carries even more debt at $45.9 billion. And with a notably higher debt-to-equity ratio of 407.6%. This elevated leverage is largely tied to its ambitious acquisitions, including its recent deal to purchase BCE stock's 37.5% stake in Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment (MLSE) for $4.7 billion.

相比之下,羅傑斯的債務更高,達到了459億。而且其債務與股本比率顯著高達407.6%。這種高槓杆主要與其雄心勃勃的收購有關,包括其最近以47億收購BCE股票在楓葉體育娛樂(MLSE)中37.5%的股份的交易。

Looking ahead

展望未來

The competitive landscape is another factor to consider. Both companies are under pressure from newer players. Future growth prospects vary significantly between the two companies. BCE stock is doubling down on its core telecom operations while divesting from non-core assets like its MLSE stake. This strategy could help the company reduce debt and stabilize its financials, but it may also limit its ability to capture growth opportunities outside of telecom.

競爭格局是另一個需要考慮的因素。這兩家公司都受到新興競爭者的壓力。未來的增長前景在兩家公司之間差異很大。BCE股票正加倍專注於其核心電信業務,同時剝離非核心資產,如其在MLSE的股份。此策略可能幫助公司減少債務,並穩定其財務狀況,但也可能限制其在電信之外捕捉增長機會的能力。

Rogers, by contrast, is leaning into its media and sports divisions as key growth drivers. The company's increased stake in MLSE gives it greater control over lucrative assets like the Toronto Raptors and Maple Leafs, but the associated costs could weigh on its balance sheet.

相比之下,羅傑斯正將其媒體和體育部門作爲主要的增長驅動力。公司在MLSE的增加股份讓其對多倫多猛龍隊和楓葉隊等盈利資產有了更大的控制權,但相關的成本可能會影響其資產負債表。

Both companies are fundamentally solid but face significant headwinds in a changing market. BCE stock offers the allure of high dividends but at the cost of elevated risk. Rogers provides a more balanced profile, with stable dividends and diversified growth prospects, though its ambitious expansion strategy could lead to growing pains. The decision ultimately comes down to your investment goals. Income-focused investors may lean toward BCE, while those looking for growth and stability might find Rogers a more compelling choice.

兩家公司在基本面上都很穩健,但在一個變化的市場中面臨着巨大的逆風。BCE股票提供了高分紅的吸引力,但伴隨着較高的風險。羅傑斯則提供了更平衡的特徵,擁有穩定的分紅和多元化的增長前景,儘管其雄心勃勃的擴張策略可能會導致成長的陣痛。最終的決定取決於你的投資目標。以收入爲導向的投資者可能會傾向於BCE,而那些尋求增長和穩定的投資者則可能發現羅傑斯是一個更具吸引力的選擇。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論