Institutional Investors Are Similarweb Ltd.'s (NYSE:SMWB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$61m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Similarweb Ltd.'s (NYSE:SMWB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$61m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Similarweb's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Insider ownership in Similarweb is 25%
- 顯著的高機構持股意味着Similarweb的股價對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 共有5位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,持股比例爲53%
- Similarweb的內部持股爲25%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Similarweb Ltd. (NYSE:SMWB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 35% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了Similarweb Ltd.(紐交所:SMWB),了解企業的股權結構非常重要。持有最大份額的是機構,持股比例爲35%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該團體將獲得最大利益(或者在下跌時承受最大的損失)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.0b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 164%.
上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到10億美元后受益最多。 上週的收益進一步提升了股東的一年回報,目前爲164%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Similarweb.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Similarweb的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Similarweb?
機構持股對Similarweb意味着什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that Similarweb does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Similarweb's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到Similarweb確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因機構有時也會進行錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Similarweb的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的故事。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Similarweb. The company's largest shareholder is Joshua Alliance, with ownership of 16%. The second and third largest shareholders are Viola Group and Prosus Ventures N.V., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 14%. Furthermore, CEO Or Offer is the owner of 4.8% of the company's shares.
我們注意到對Similarweb沒有顯著投資的對沖基金。該公司的最大股東是Joshua Alliance,持股16%。第二和第三大股東分別是Viola Group和Prosus Ventures N.V.,均持有14%的股份。此外,首席執行官Or Offer持有公司4.8%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了讓我們的研究更加有趣,我們發現前5大股東控制了公司超過一半的股份,這意味着這一群體在公司的決策中具有相當大的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的機構持有情況可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師在跟蹤這隻股票,因此也值得看看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Similarweb
Similarweb的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Similarweb Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.0b, and insiders have US$265m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有Similarweb Ltd.相當比例的股份。該公司的市值僅爲10億美元,內部人士名下持有價值26500萬美元的股份。這相當顯著。大多數人會說這顯示了與股東之間良好的對齊,尤其是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這一群體未必能主導決策,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真實影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 27%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
擁有27%的股份,股權投資公司在塑造企業策略方面可以發揮作用,重點放在價值創造上。對於某些投資者而言,這可能是一個鼓勵,因爲股權投資公司有時能夠推動策略,使市場認識到公司的價值。另一方面,那些持有者可能在公司上市後會退出投資。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Similarweb that you should be aware of before investing here.
我發現了解到底誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現Similarweb有1個警告信號,你在這裏投資之前應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。