share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That Genpact (NYSE:G) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That Genpact (NYSE:G) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

這四項指標表明簡伯特(紐交所:G)在合理使用債務。
Simply Wall St ·  12/17 19:47

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Genpact Limited (NYSE:G) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫·巴菲特曾說:『波動性遠非與風險同義詞。』 因此,當你考慮任何特定股票的風險時,考慮債務可能是顯而易見的,因爲過多的債務可以使公司陷入困境。 我們可以看到簡伯特有限公司(紐交所:G)確實在其業務中使用了債務。 但真正的問題是這些債務是否使公司變得風險較大。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務帶來風險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

當企業無法輕鬆履行債務和其他負債時,這些責任就變得有風險,無論是通過自由現金流還是通過以吸引人的價格籌集資金。 資本主義的一個重要組成部分是『創造性破壞』的過程,其中失敗的企業被他們的銀行毫不留情地清算。 然而,較爲常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,它必須以低價格籌集新的股權資本,從而永久性地稀釋股東的權益。 當然,許多公司使用債務來資助增長,而沒有任何負面後果。 當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先同時考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Genpact's Debt?

簡伯特的債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Genpact had US$1.63b of debt, an increase on US$1.31b, over one year. However, it also had US$1.03b in cash, and so its net debt is US$599.4m.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示截至2024年9月,簡伯特的債務爲16.3億美元,比13.1億美元增加。 然而,它也有10.3億美元現金,因此其淨債務爲59940萬美元。

big
NYSE:G Debt to Equity History December 17th 2024
紐交所:G 債務與股本歷史 2024年12月17日

How Strong Is Genpact's Balance Sheet?

簡伯特的資產負債表有多強?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Genpact had liabilities of US$1.29b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.64b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.03b in cash and US$1.21b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$688.8m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

我們從最新的資產負債表中看到,簡伯特的短期負債爲126億美元,長期負債爲16.4億美元。對此,它有10.3億美元的現金和12.1億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出6880萬美元。

Of course, Genpact has a market capitalization of US$7.88b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

當然,簡伯特的市值爲78.8億美元,因此這些負債可能是可控的。但負債的確足夠,未來我們會建議股東繼續關注資產負債表。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們通過查看公司的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的比例來衡量公司相對於其收益能力的債務負擔,以及計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)覆蓋利息支出的能力(利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們在考慮收益時同時考慮了折舊與攤銷費用及不考慮這些費用的情況。

Genpact has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.78. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 13.7 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. The good news is that Genpact has increased its EBIT by 3.6% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Genpact's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

簡伯特的淨債務與EBITDA的比率僅爲0.78。而其EBIT能覆蓋利息費用多達13.7倍。因此,你可以說它的債務對它的威脅就像大象對老鼠的威脅一樣。好消息是,簡伯特在過去12個月內將其EBIT提高了3.6%,這應該能緩解對債務償還的擔憂。分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是關注的重點。但未來盈利,尤其是,決定了簡伯特今後維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你專注於未來,可以查看這份免費的報告,展示分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Genpact recorded free cash flow worth 76% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,一家公司只能用現金償還債務,而不是會計利潤。因此,合理的步驟是查看那部分EBIT與實際自由現金流的比率。在最近的三年中,簡伯特的自由現金流佔其EBIT的76%,這在正常範圍內,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅收。這筆現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Genpact's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Genpact's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Genpact is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...

高興的是,簡伯特令人印象深刻的利息保障倍數意味着它在債務方面處於有利地位。而且好消息並不僅止於此,因爲它將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流的能力進一步支持了這一印象!從更廣泛的角度來看,我們認爲簡伯特對債務的使用似乎相當合理,我們對此並不擔心。畢竟,合理的槓桿可以提高股本回報。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的領域。然而,投資風險並不全在資產負債表中,遠非如此。請注意,簡伯特在我們的投資分析中顯示出2個警告信號,其中1個令我們感到不太舒服...

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

無論最終結果如何,有時候更容易關注那些根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費獲取一份淨債務爲零的成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論