The Total Return for Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) Investors Has Risen Faster Than Earnings Growth Over the Last Three Years
The Total Return for Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) Investors Has Risen Faster Than Earnings Growth Over the Last Three Years
Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) shareholders might be concerned after seeing the share price drop 13% in the last quarter. But that shouldn't obscure the pleasing returns achieved by shareholders over the last three years. In the last three years the share price is up, 47%: better than the market.
洛克希德馬丁公司(紐交所:LMT)的股東在看到股票價格在上個季度下跌了13%後,可能會感到擔憂。但這不應該掩蓋股東在過去三年中獲得的令人滿意的回報。在過去三年中,股票價格上漲了47%,好於市場表現。
While this past week has detracted from the company's three-year return, let's look at the recent trends of the underlying business and see if the gains have been in alignment.
儘管上週的表現影響了公司的三年回報,但我們來看看基礎業務的近期趨勢,看看收益是否與之保持一致。
There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.
不可否認的是,市場有時是有效的,但價格並不總是反映基本的業務表現。通過比較每股收益(EPS)和股價變化,我們可以了解投資者對公司的態度是如何隨時間變化的。
During three years of share price growth, Lockheed Martin achieved compound earnings per share growth of 8.9% per year. This EPS growth is lower than the 14% average annual increase in the share price. So it's fair to assume the market has a higher opinion of the business than it did three years ago. It's not unusual to see the market 're-rate' a stock, after a few years of growth.
在三年的股票價格增長期間,洛克希德馬丁實現了每股收益複合增長率爲每年8.9%。這個每股收益的增長低於股票價格14%的年度平均增幅。因此,可以合理地假設市場對該業務的看法比三年前更高。經過幾年的增長後,市場對一隻股票進行「重新評級」是很正常的。
The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下圖顯示了EPS隨時間變化的情況(點擊圖像以顯示確切值)。
Dive deeper into Lockheed Martin's key metrics by checking this interactive graph of Lockheed Martin's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
深入了解洛克希德馬丁的關鍵指標,查看這一互動圖表,了解洛克希德馬丁的收益、營業收入和現金流。
What About Dividends?
關於分紅派息的問題
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Lockheed Martin the TSR over the last 3 years was 59%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.
除了衡量股價收益,投資者還應該考慮總股東回報(TSR)。而股價收益僅反映股價的變化,TSR則包括分紅派息的價值(假設它們被再投資)以及任何折扣融資或分拆的益處。可以說,TSR更全面地反映了股票所產生的回報。我們注意到,洛克希德馬丁過去3年的TSR爲59%,這優於上述提到的股價收益。公司支付的分紅派息因此提升了總股東回報。
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
Lockheed Martin provided a TSR of 14% over the last twelve months. But that return falls short of the market. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it's actually better than the average return of 8% over half a decade This suggests the company might be improving over time. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Lockheed Martin better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Lockheed Martin , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
洛克希德馬丁在過去12個月提供了14%的TSR。但這一回報低於市場水平。好的一面是,這仍然是一個增長,而實際上比過去五年的平均回報8%要好。這表明公司可能在逐步改善。長期跟蹤股價表現總是有趣的。但要更好地理解洛克希德馬丁,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險永遠是一個存在的問題。我們發現了洛克希德馬丁存在1個警告信號,理解這些應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。
Of course Lockheed Martin may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.
當然,洛克希德馬丁可能不是最好的買入股票。所以你可能想看看這份免費的增長股集合。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在美國交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。